• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芬兰多发性硬化症患者的初始治疗策略和临床结局:一项倾向评分匹配研究。

Initial treatment strategy and clinical outcomes in Finnish MS patients: a propensity-matched study.

机构信息

Turku University Hospital Neurocenter, Turku, Finland.

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

J Neurol. 2022 Feb;269(2):913-922. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10673-9. Epub 2021 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00415-021-10673-9
PMID:34170403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8782786/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of initial treatment with infusion therapies and starting therapy with medium efficacy therapy in a propensity-matched cohort of Finnish RRMS patients.

METHODS

A total of 154 RRMS patients initiating natalizumab, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab or rituximab as first DMT (high efficacy DMT, heDMT group) and 1771 patients initially treated with injectable therapies, teriflunomide or dimethylfumarate and escalated based on disease activity (moderate efficacy DMT, meDMT group) were identified from the Finnish MS registry. Nearest neighbor propensity matching (1:1, caliper 0.1) was performed for age, sex, baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), annual relapse rate (ARR) one year prior DMT and time since MS symptom onset. Primary outcome was time to 6-month confirmed EDSS progression and the secondary outcome time to first relapse.

RESULTS

In the propensity-matched group comparisons, the probability of 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) at 5 years after DMT start was 28.4% (95% CI 15.7-39.3) in the heDMT group (n = 66) and 47.0% (95% CI 33.1-58.1) in meDMT group (n = 66), p = 0.013. Probability of relapse at 5 years was 34.6% (95% CI 24.1-43.6) for heDMT (n = 105) and 47.2% (95% CI 36.6-56.1) for meDMT (n = 105), p = 0.019.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiating MS-therapy with heDMT significantly reduced the risk of 5-year disability progression and relapse compared to using meDMT as first DMT choice in propensity-matched groups of Finnish MS-patients.

摘要

背景

在复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)中,采用疾病修正治疗(DMT)的最佳治疗策略仍不确定。

目的

在芬兰 RRMS 患者的倾向匹配队列中,比较输注治疗和中等疗效治疗初始治疗的结果。

方法

从芬兰 MS 登记处确定了 154 例首次接受那他珠单抗、阿仑单抗、奥瑞珠单抗或利妥昔单抗作为一线 DMT(高效能 DMT,heDMT 组)和 1771 例首次接受注射治疗、特立氟胺或二甲基富马酸,并根据疾病活动度升级为中等疗效 DMT(meDMT 组)的 RRMS 患者。采用最近邻倾向匹配(1:1,卡尺 0.1),匹配年龄、性别、基线扩展残疾状况量表(EDSS)、DMT 前一年的年复发率(ARR)和 MS 症状发作后的时间。主要结局是 6 个月时确认的 EDSS 进展时间,次要结局是首次复发时间。

结果

在倾向匹配组比较中,在 DMT 开始后 5 年,heDMT 组(n=66)6 个月时确认残疾进展(CDP)的概率为 28.4%(95%CI 15.7-39.3),meDMT 组(n=66)为 47.0%(95%CI 33.1-58.1),p=0.013。heDMT 组(n=105)5 年时的复发率为 34.6%(95%CI 24.1-43.6),meDMT 组(n=105)为 47.2%(95%CI 36.6-56.1),p=0.019。

结论

在芬兰 MS 患者的倾向匹配组中,与使用 meDMT 作为一线 DMT 选择相比,起始使用 heDMT 治疗可显著降低 5 年残疾进展和复发的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b5/8782786/940d4cf9d931/415_2021_10673_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b5/8782786/41dd8ac5ae98/415_2021_10673_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b5/8782786/045b2b429a32/415_2021_10673_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b5/8782786/940d4cf9d931/415_2021_10673_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b5/8782786/41dd8ac5ae98/415_2021_10673_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b5/8782786/045b2b429a32/415_2021_10673_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b5/8782786/940d4cf9d931/415_2021_10673_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Initial treatment strategy and clinical outcomes in Finnish MS patients: a propensity-matched study.芬兰多发性硬化症患者的初始治疗策略和临床结局:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
J Neurol. 2022 Feb;269(2):913-922. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10673-9. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
2
Age and sex as determinants of treatment decisions in patients with relapsing-remitting MS.年龄和性别作为复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者治疗决策的决定因素。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 May;50:102813. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102813. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
3
Initial high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis: A nationwide cohort study.多发性硬化症的初始高效疾病修正治疗:一项全国性队列研究。
Neurology. 2020 Aug 25;95(8):e1041-e1051. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010135. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
4
Treatment escalation leads to fewer relapses compared with switching to another moderately effective therapy.与转换为另一种中度有效的治疗方法相比,治疗升级可导致更少的复发。
J Neurol. 2019 Feb;266(2):306-315. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-9126-y. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
5
Association of Initial Disease-Modifying Therapy With Later Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.初始疾病修饰治疗与随后继发进展性多发性硬化转化的相关性。
JAMA. 2019 Jan 15;321(2):175-187. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.20588.
6
High-Efficacy Therapies for Treatment-Naïve Individuals with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.治疗初发缓解型多发性硬化症的高效疗法。
CNS Drugs. 2022 Dec;36(12):1285-1299. doi: 10.1007/s40263-022-00965-7. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
7
Discontinuation of disease-modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis to plan a pregnancy: A retrospective registry study.为计划怀孕而停用多发性硬化症的疾病修正治疗:一项回顾性登记研究。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Nov;46:102518. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102518. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
8
Does initial high efficacy therapy in multiple sclerosis surpass escalation treatment strategy? A comparison of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the Czech and Swedish national multiple sclerosis registries.多发性硬化症初始高效治疗是否优于升级治疗策略?捷克和瑞典国家多发性硬化症注册中心的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者比较。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Aug;76:104803. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104803. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
9
Clinical and economic evaluations of natalizumab, rituximab, and ocrelizumab for the management of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Saudi Arabia.在沙特阿拉伯,对那他珠单抗、利妥昔单抗和奥瑞珠单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的临床和经济评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 26;23(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09462-z.
10
Clinical Outcomes of Escalation vs Early Intensive Disease-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者强化治疗与早期强化疾病修正治疗的临床结局。
JAMA Neurol. 2019 May 1;76(5):536-541. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4905.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: recommendations from an expert Delphi consensus.多发性硬化症高效疾病修正疗法的应用:专家德尔菲共识推荐意见
J Neurol. 2025 Aug 10;272(9):565. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13293-9.
2
Real-World Treatment Outcomes in Black, Hispanic, Asian, and White Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Natalizumab.接受那他珠单抗治疗的黑人、西班牙裔、亚裔和白人多发性硬化症患者的真实世界治疗结果
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2025 May 30. doi: 10.1007/s40801-025-00495-w.
3
HERV Dysregulation in a Case of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Multiple Sclerosis Responsive to Rituximab.

本文引用的文献

1
Initial high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis: A nationwide cohort study.多发性硬化症的初始高效疾病修正治疗:一项全国性队列研究。
Neurology. 2020 Aug 25;95(8):e1041-e1051. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010135. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
2
Contribution of Relapse-Independent Progression vs Relapse-Associated Worsening to Overall Confirmed Disability Accumulation in Typical Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in a Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.在两项随机临床试验的汇总分析中,复发无关进展与复发相关恶化对典型复发型多发性硬化症总体确认残疾累积的贡献。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):1132-1140. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1568.
3
1例对利妥昔单抗有反应的肌痛性脑脊髓炎和多发性硬化症患者中的人内源性逆转录病毒失调
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 20;26(10):4885. doi: 10.3390/ijms26104885.
4
Evolving Patterns of Initial RRMS Treatment in Finland (2013-2022): Insights From a Nationwide Multiple Sclerosis Register.芬兰初始复发缓解型多发性硬化症治疗模式的演变(2013 - 2022年):来自全国多发性硬化症登记处的见解
Brain Behav. 2025 Feb;15(2):e70326. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70326.
5
A multi-country cohort database study to assess pregnancy and infant outcomes after potential maternal or paternal exposure to cladribine tablets in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: the CLEAR study methods and status update.一项多国队列数据库研究,旨在评估多发性硬化症治疗中母亲或父亲潜在接触克拉屈滨片后的妊娠和婴儿结局:CLEAR研究方法及现状更新
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2025 Jan 27;18:17562864241310996. doi: 10.1177/17562864241310996. eCollection 2025.
6
Beyond lines of treatment: embracing early high-efficacy disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis management.超越治疗线:采用早期高效疾病修正治疗来管理多发性硬化症
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024 Oct 16;17:17562864241284372. doi: 10.1177/17562864241284372. eCollection 2024.
7
Real-world treatment outcomes and safety of natalizumab in Finnish multiple sclerosis patients.那他珠单抗在芬兰多发性硬化症患者中的真实世界治疗效果及安全性
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2023 Oct 4;9(4):20552173231204466. doi: 10.1177/20552173231204466. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
8
Course of therapy in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis despite first-line treatment.尽管接受了一线治疗,但仍处于复发缓解型多发性硬化活动期患者的治疗过程
Postep Psychiatr Neurol. 2023 Jun;32(2):59-67. doi: 10.5114/ppn.2023.129048. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
9
Efficacy and safety of rituximab in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.利妥昔单抗治疗多发性硬化症的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2023 Dec;123(6):2115-2127. doi: 10.1007/s13760-023-02329-4. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
10
Treatment Courses of Patients Newly Diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis in 2012-2018.2012 - 2018年新诊断多发性硬化症患者的治疗疗程
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 11;12(2):595. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020595.
Determining the effectiveness of early intensive versus escalation approaches for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: The DELIVER-MS study protocol.
确定早期强化与升级治疗方案治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的有效性:DELIVER-MS 研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;95:106009. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106009. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
4
Timing of high-efficacy therapy for multiple sclerosis: a retrospective observational cohort study.多发性硬化症高疗效治疗时机:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Apr;19(4):307-316. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30067-3. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
5
Minimal evidence of disease activity (MEDA) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症复发缓解型中疾病活动度的最低证据 (MEDA)。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;91(3):271-277. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322348. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
6
Early highly effective versus escalation treatment approaches in relapsing multiple sclerosis.复发型多发性硬化症的早期高效与升级治疗方法。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Oct;18(10):973-980. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30151-6. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
7
Multiple sclerosis in Finland 2018-Data from the national register.2018 年芬兰多发性硬化症报告——国家注册中心数据
Acta Neurol Scand. 2019 Nov;140(5):303-311. doi: 10.1111/ane.13145. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
8
Clinical Outcomes of Escalation vs Early Intensive Disease-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者强化治疗与早期强化疾病修正治疗的临床结局。
JAMA Neurol. 2019 May 1;76(5):536-541. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4905.
9
Multiple sclerosis registries in Europe - An updated mapping survey.欧洲的多发性硬化症登记处——一项最新的图谱调查。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.032. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
10
Efficacy and Safety of the Newer Multiple Sclerosis Drugs Approved Since 2010.2010 年以来获批新型多发性硬化症药物的疗效和安全性。
CNS Drugs. 2018 Mar;32(3):269-287. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0488-6.