Multiple Sclerosis Center, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Roma, Italy
Multiple Sclerosis Center, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Presidio di Montichiari, Brescia, Italy.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;91(3):271-277. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322348. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
This study aimed to define the minimal evidence of disease activity (MEDA) during treatment that can be tolerated without exposing patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis at risk of long-term disability.
We retrospectively collected data of patients followed up to 10 years after starting interferon beta or glatiramer acetate. Survival analyses explored the association between the long-term risk of reaching an Expanded Disability Status Scale≥6.0 and early clinical and MRI activity assessed after the first and second year of treatment. Early disease activity was classified by the so-called 'MAGNIMS score' (: no relapses and <3 new T2 lesions; : no relapses and ≥3 new T2 lesions or 1 relapse and 0-2 new T2 lesions; : 1 relapse and ≥3 new T2 lesions or ≥2 relapses) and the absence or presence of contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs).
At follow-up, 148/1036 (14.3%) patients reached the outcome: 61/685 (8.9%) with score (reference category), 57/241 (23.7%) with score (HR=1.94, p=0.002) and 30/110 (27.3%) with score (HR=2.47, p<0.001) after the first year of treatment. In the score subgroup, the risk was further reduced in the absence (49/607, 8.1%) than in the presence of CELs (12/78, 15.4%; HR=2.11, p=0.01). No evident disease activity and score in the absence of CELs shared the same risk (p=0.54). Similar findings were obtained even after the second year of treatment.
Early marginal MRI activity of one to two new T2 lesions, in the absence of both relapses and CELs, is associated with a minor risk of future disability, thus representing a simple and valuable definition for MEDA.
本研究旨在确定治疗过程中可以耐受的最小疾病活动(MEDA)证据,以免使复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者面临长期残疾的风险。
我们回顾性收集了接受干扰素β或醋酸格拉替雷治疗后随访 10 年的患者数据。生存分析探讨了首次和第二年治疗后早期临床和 MRI 活动评估与长期达到扩展残疾状态量表≥6.0 风险之间的关联。早期疾病活动通过所谓的“MAGNIMS 评分”进行分类(无复发且<3 个新 T2 病变;无复发且≥3 个新 T2 病变或 1 次复发且 0-2 个新 T2 病变;1 次复发且≥3 个新 T2 病变或≥2 次复发)和有无对比增强病变(CELs)。
随访时,148/1036 例(14.3%)患者达到了结局:61/685 例(8.9%)患者评分(参考类别),57/241 例(23.7%)患者评分(HR=1.94,p=0.002),30/110 例(27.3%)患者评分(HR=2.47,p<0.001)。在评分亚组中,CELs 缺失(49/607,8.1%)比 CELs 存在(12/78,15.4%;HR=2.11,p=0.01)的风险更低。在缺乏 CELs 的情况下,无明显疾病活动和评分具有相同的风险(p=0.54)。即使在第二年的治疗后也得到了类似的发现。
无复发和 CELs 情况下,1 至 2 个新 T2 病变的早期边缘 MRI 活动与未来残疾的风险较小相关,因此代表了 MEDA 的简单而有价值的定义。