Suppr超能文献

适应挑战性环境:美国 COVID-19 大流行中心的一个种族多样化城市人群中的子宫托护理。

Adapting to Challenging Circumstances: Pessary Care in a Racially Diverse Urban Population Within a U.S. Epicenter of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

From the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health.

Department of Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.

出版信息

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022 Feb 1;28(2):121-125. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001085.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to describe time intervals between pessary maintenance visits in racially diverse women receiving care in a U.S. epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic. We secondarily aimed to determine whether time interval between pessary changes is associated with adverse outcomes and to identify factors associated with adverse pessary outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of women undergoing pessary care after the COVID-19 pandemic began. Time between the most recent visit before the pandemic and first visit after the pandemic began was recorded. Pessary care data were collected from the latter visit, including vaginal bleeding, vaginal discharge, and erosion. Patient-reported symptoms and demographics were also recorded. The relationship between time interval between pessary visits and adverse outcomes as well as between adverse outcomes and demographic data was assessed.

RESULTS

We identified 104 women undergoing pessary care, of which 35.6% were Hispanic and 32.7% were Black and 26.2% ± 10.5% lived in poverty. The median time to in-person visit was 4.5 months (interquartile range, 3.7-5.3 months). Seven women (8.7%) had vaginal bleeding, 15 (14.6%) had vaginal discharge, and 7 (6.8%) had erosions. There was no significant association between time interval between pessary visits and adverse outcomes or between adverse outcomes and patient characteristics (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Longer duration of time between pessary maintenance visits is not associated with increased adverse outcomes in this group of racially diverse women. Extended intervals between pessary visits can be considered to minimize risk and maintain patient safety during challenging circumstances, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述在美国 COVID-19 大流行中心接受治疗的不同种族女性使用子宫托维持治疗期间的就诊间隔时间。我们的次要目的是确定子宫托更换间隔时间是否与不良结局相关,并确定与不良子宫托结局相关的因素。

方法

我们对 COVID-19 大流行开始后接受子宫托治疗的女性进行了回顾性研究。记录大流行前最近一次就诊与大流行后首次就诊之间的时间间隔。从后者就诊中收集子宫托治疗数据,包括阴道出血、阴道分泌物和糜烂。还记录了患者报告的症状和人口统计学数据。评估了就诊间隔时间与不良结局之间的关系,以及不良结局与人口统计学数据之间的关系。

结果

我们共纳入了 104 名接受子宫托治疗的女性,其中 35.6%为西班牙裔,32.7%为非裔,26.2%±10.5%生活贫困。面对面就诊的中位数时间为 4.5 个月(四分位距,3.7-5.3 个月)。7 名女性(8.7%)有阴道出血,15 名女性(14.6%)有阴道分泌物,7 名女性(6.8%)有糜烂。就诊间隔时间与不良结局之间或不良结局与患者特征之间均无显著相关性(均 P>0.05)。

结论

在这群不同种族的女性中,就诊间隔时间较长与不良结局无关。在 COVID-19 大流行等困难时期,延长子宫托随访间隔时间可以降低风险,保障患者安全。

相似文献

1
2
Pessaries and rectovaginal fistulae: consequences of delayed clinical follow-up in the Covid-19 pandemic.
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Sep;32(9):2353-2356. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04926-4. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
3
Adverse events associated with pessary use over one year among women attending a pessary care clinic.
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Aug;34(8):1765-1770. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05462-z. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
The impact on complication rates of delayed routine pessary reviews during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jun;34(6):1219-1225. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05333-z. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
6
Discontinuation rate and adverse events after 1 year of vaginal pessary use in women with pelvic organ prolapse.
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Aug;29(8):1123-1128. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3445-x. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
7
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Severity and Genital Hiatus Size With Long-Term Pessary Use.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;27(2):e360-e362. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000937.
8
Risk Factors for Dislodgment of Vaginal Pessaries in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Cohort Study.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):e247-e251. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000882.
9
Effectiveness of a continuous-use ring-shaped vaginal pessary without support for advanced pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women.
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Nov;29(11):1629-1636. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3586-6. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
10
Timing of Office-Based Pessary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;135(1):100-105. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003580.

引用本文的文献

1
Updates in Pessary Care for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Narrative Review.
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 16;14(8):2737. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082737.

本文引用的文献

1
Representation of Minority Groups in Key Pelvic Floor Disorder Trials.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Oct 1;27(10):602-608. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001002.
3
A guide for urogynecologic patient care utilizing telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: review of existing evidence.
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Jun;31(6):1063-1089. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04314-4. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
4
The Vaginal Microbiome in U.S. Black Women: A Systematic Review.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Mar;29(3):362-375. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7717. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
5
Is it safe and effective to maintain the vaginal pessary without removing it for 2 consecutive years?
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Dec;31(12):2521-2528. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04240-5. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
6
Effect of pessary cleaning and optimal time interval for follow-up: a prospective cohort study.
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Aug;31(8):1567-1574. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04200-8. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
7
Timing of Office-Based Pessary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;135(1):100-105. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003580.
9
Racioethnic diversity in the dynamics of the vaginal microbiome during pregnancy.
Nat Med. 2019 Jun;25(6):1001-1011. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0465-8. Epub 2019 May 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验