Department of Orthodontics (G56), Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse 100, 66424, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Head Face Med. 2024 Oct 18;20(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00462-w.
Maxillary retrognathia and/or mandibular prognathia are resulting in class III malocclusion. Regarding orthodontic class III malocclusion treatment, the literature reports several treatment approaches. This comparative clinical study investigated two maxillary protraction protocols including bone anchors and Delaire type facemask.
Cephalometric radiographs of n = 31 patients were used for data acquisition. The patients were divided into two groups according to their treatment protocol: bone anchored protraction (n = 12, 8 female, 4 male; mean age 11.00 ± 1.76 years; average application: 13.50 ± 5.87 months) and facemask protraction (n = 19, 11 female, 8 male; mean age 6.74 ± 1.15 years; average application: 9.95 ± 4.17 months). The evaluation included established procedures for measurements of the maxilla, mandibula, incisor inclination and soft tissue. Statistics included Shapiro-Wilk- and T-Tests for the radiographs. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
The cephalometric analysis showed differences among the two groups. SNA angle showed significant improvements during protraction with bone anchors (2.30 ± 1.18°) with increase in the Wits appraisal of 2.01 ± 2.65 mm. SNA angle improved also during protraction with facemask (1.22 ± 2.28°) with increase in the Wits appraisal of 1.85 ± 4.09 mm. Proclination of maxillary incisors was larger in patients with facemask (3.35 ± 6.18°) and ML-SN angle increased more (1.05 ± 1.51°) than in patients with bone anchors. Loosening rate of bone anchors was 14.58%.
Both treatment protocols led to correction of a class III malocclusion. However, this study was obtained immediately after protraction treatment and longitudinal observations after growth spurt will be needed to verify the treatment effects over a longer period. The use of skeletal anchorage for maxillary protraction reduces unwanted side effects and increases skeletal effects needed for class III correction.
上颌后缩和/或下颌前突导致 III 类错牙合。关于正畸 III 类错牙合的治疗,文献报道了几种治疗方法。本临床对比研究调查了两种上颌前牵引方案,包括骨锚和 Delaire 型面弓。
使用 n = 31 名患者的头颅侧位片进行数据采集。根据治疗方案将患者分为两组:骨锚式牵引组(n = 12,8 女,4 男;平均年龄 11.00 ± 1.76 岁;平均应用时间:13.50 ± 5.87 个月)和面罩牵引组(n = 19,11 女,8 男;平均年龄 6.74 ± 1.15 岁;平均应用时间:9.95 ± 4.17 个月)。评估包括对上颌、下颌、切牙倾斜和软组织的测量的既定程序。统计分析包括对 X 光片进行 Shapiro-Wilk 和 T 检验。显著性水平设为 p < 0.05。
头影测量分析显示两组之间存在差异。骨锚式牵引时 SNA 角显著改善(2.30 ± 1.18°),Wits 评估增加 2.01 ± 2.65 mm。面罩牵引时 SNA 角也有改善(1.22 ± 2.28°),Wits 评估增加 1.85 ± 4.09 mm。上颌切牙前突在面罩组更大(3.35 ± 6.18°),ML-SN 角增加更多(1.05 ± 1.51°),而骨锚组则较少。骨锚松动率为 14.58%。
两种治疗方案均能纠正 III 类错牙合。然而,本研究是在牵引治疗后立即获得的,需要在生长突增后进行长期观察,以验证治疗效果的长期效果。上颌骨牵引时使用骨骼锚固可减少不必要的副作用,并增加 III 类矫正所需的骨骼效果。