Royal Danish Academy - Architecture, Design, Conservation, Center for Visibility Design, Denmark.
Royal Danish Academy - Architecture, Design, Conservation, Center for Visibility Design, Denmark.
Appl Ergon. 2021 Nov;97:103499. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103499. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
To make graphical user interfaces look more fashionable, designers often make use of high-stroke-contrast fonts. We are yet to understand how these fonts affect reading. We examined the effect of letter-stroke contrast on three bold fonts, one with extreme contrast between thick and thin strokes, one with no contrast, and one in between. The fonts were designed for this experiment to enable control of font variables. Participants identified the middle letter in a lowercase letter trigram in each trial, briefly presented in the parafovea (at 2° left and right of fixation) and at the foveal fixation point. There was evidence for letter recognition impairment for the font with high stroke contrast compared to the fonts with low and medium stroke contrast, while there was no significant difference in performance between the medium- and low-stroke-contrast fonts. The results suggest that bold fonts with high stroke contrast should not be considered for designs where letter recognition is a priority.
为了使图形用户界面看起来更时尚,设计师通常会使用高笔画对比度的字体。我们还需要了解这些字体如何影响阅读。我们研究了字母笔画对比度对三种粗体字体的影响,一种是粗细笔画对比度极高,一种是没有对比度,一种是介于两者之间。这些字体是为这项实验设计的,以便能够控制字体变量。参与者在每个试验中识别小写字母三连字母中的中间字母,这些字母短暂地呈现在中央凹(注视点左右 2°)和中央凹注视点处。与笔画对比度低和中文字体相比,笔画对比度高的字体在字母识别方面存在障碍,而中文字体和低文字体之间的性能没有显著差异。结果表明,对于字母识别是优先考虑的设计,不应考虑笔画对比度高的粗体字体。