Suppr超能文献

导管消融、杂交手术或外科手术:房颤消融的未来在哪里?

Catheter, surgical, or hybrid procedure: what future for atrial fibrillation ablation?

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, GVM Care&Research, Anthea Hospital, Via Camillo Rosalba, 35, /38, Bari, Italy.

Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart & Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jun 26;16(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01565-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The debate on the best treatment strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) has expanded following the introduction of the so-called "hybrid procedure" that combines minimally invasive epicardial ablation with endocardial catheter ablation. However, the advantage of the hybrid approach over conventional epicardial ablation remains to be established.

METHODS

From June 2008 to December 2020, 609 surgical AF ablation procedures through a right minithoracotomy were performed at our institution. From 2008 to 2011, a unipolar radiofrequency (RF) device was used, whereas from 2011 to 2020 a bipolar RF device was used. In addition, between September 2016 and April 2017, 60 patients underwent endocardial completion of epicardial linear ablation. In 30 of these latter patients, surgical isolation of the Bachmann's bundle (BB) was also performed. Starting from 2021, surviving patients at follow-up were asked to undergo electrocardiographic evaluation and left ventricular function assessment and to complete a questionnaire addressing quality of life and predisposing factors for recurrent AF.

RESULTS

The ablation procedure was completed in all patients. Upon discharge, 30 (4.9%) patients showed recurrence of AF, whereas the remaining patients (95.1%) were in sinus rhythm. All patients in whom a hybrid approach was used either with or without BB ablation were discharged in sinus rhythm. After a mean follow-up of 74 months, 122 (20%) patients developed recurrent AF, including 19.9% in whom a unipolar RF device was used, 21% in whom a bipolar RF device was used, 23% who had undergone a hybrid procedure without BB ablation and 3.3% who had undergone a hybrid procedure with BB ablation. On multivariate analysis, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, worsening of European Heart Rhythm Association symptom class, and cognitive impairment or depression during follow-up were found to be significantly associated with AF recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical AF ablation through a right minithoracotomy is safe and may allow the creation of additional linear lesions, particularly in the BB. The placement of adjunctive linear lesions in the setting of a hybrid procedure can be more effective in reducing the risk for AF recurrence than isolated surgical ablation or hybrid ablation without the addition of further linear lesions, with no incremental risk to the patient.

摘要

背景

随着所谓的“杂交手术”的引入,即微创心外膜消融与心内膜导管消融相结合,心房颤动(AF)的最佳治疗策略的争论不断扩大。然而,杂交手术相对于传统的心外膜消融的优势仍有待确定。

方法

自 2008 年 6 月至 2020 年 12 月,我院通过右小开胸术进行了 609 例房颤消融手术。2008 年至 2011 年,使用单极射频(RF)设备,而 2011 年至 2020 年使用双极 RF 设备。此外,2016 年 9 月至 2017 年 4 月,60 例患者接受了心外膜线性消融的心内膜完成。在这些患者中,有 30 例还进行了 Bachmann 束(BB)的外科隔离。自 2021 年起,随访时存活的患者被要求进行心电图评估和左心室功能评估,并填写一份关于生活质量和复发性房颤易患因素的问卷。

结果

所有患者均完成了消融手术。出院时,30 例(4.9%)患者出现 AF 复发,其余患者(95.1%)窦性节律。所有接受杂交手术治疗的患者(无论是否进行 BB 消融)均出院时为窦性节律。平均随访 74 个月后,122 例(20%)患者出现复发性房颤,其中 19.9%使用单极 RF 设备,21%使用双极 RF 设备,23%接受杂交手术但未进行 BB 消融,3.3%接受杂交手术且进行了 BB 消融。多变量分析发现,左心室射血分数降低、欧洲心脏节律协会症状分级恶化以及随访期间认知障碍或抑郁与房颤复发显著相关。

结论

通过右小开胸术进行房颤消融术是安全的,并且可以创建更多的线性病变,特别是在 BB 处。在杂交手术中添加附加的线性病变可能比单独的外科消融或不添加进一步的线性病变的杂交消融更有效地降低房颤复发的风险,并且不会给患者带来额外的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a7/8236186/1e8c52efa8ec/13019_2021_1565_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验