Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611.
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611.
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Sep;104(9):10090-10099. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20435. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
Social contact affects social development and response to novelty in dairy calves, but the age of introduction to social housing varies on-farm and may have implications for behavioral development and response to social grouping. The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the effects of early social contact during approximately the first 2 wk of life on calf early life behavior and performance and responses following initial social regrouping, followed by subsequent regrouping. At birth, calves were randomly assigned to individual (IH; n = 16 calves) or pair-housing (PH; n = 8 pairs). Calves were mingled between treatments and initially grouped (4 calves/pen) at 13 ± 2 d of age (mean ± standard deviation) and then regrouped (8 calves/pen) at 20 ± 5 d of age. Calf ability to learn to feed independently from the teat bucket in early life, and from the autofeeder following grouping, was monitored. Calf health, feed intake, and weight gain were recorded throughout the first 3 wk of life. Activity and social interactions were continuously recorded from video for the first 24 h following grouping and regrouping (except for allogrooming, hay consumption, and social play, which were observed for 12 h due to nighttime visibility). During the period of exposure to different housing treatments, calf feed intake and weight gain did not differ, but calves housed in pairs tended to scour for fewer days [4.1 vs. 5.6 d; PH vs. IH; standard error (SE) = 0.58]. Previously pair-housed calves spent more time lying socially (within 1 body length of another calf) than previously individually housed calves following both initial grouping (9.8 vs. 5.7 h/d; PH vs. IH; SE = 0.83) and regrouping (11.3 vs. 9.1 h/d; PH vs. IH; SE = 1.1). We saw no effects of previous social contact on duration of brush use (31.5 min/d; SE = 4.2), hay feeding (5.1 min/12 h; SE = 1.6), allogrooming (4.1 min/12 h; SE = 0.16), or social play (0.52 min/12 h; SE = 0.19) following initial grouping or regrouping. However, previously pair-housed calves tended to have greater lying time after regrouping. These results suggest that early life social contact before social grouping in the first weeks of life may not greatly affect activity within the pen or active social interactions following the transition to group housing. However, persistent differences in duration of social lying suggests that early life social contact may influence overall comfort toward other calves following social grouping.
社会接触会影响奶牛犊牛的社会发展和对新奇事物的反应,但在农场中引入社会住房的年龄因情况而异,这可能对行为发展和对社会群体的反应产生影响。本实验的目的是评估在生命的头 2 周内进行早期社会接触对犊牛早期生活行为和性能的影响,以及随后的重新分组后的反应。在出生时,将小牛随机分配到单独饲养(IH;n = 16 头)或成对饲养(PH;n = 8 对)。在 13 ± 2 日龄(均值 ± 标准差)时,将小牛混合处理并最初分组(4 头/栏),然后在 20 ± 5 日龄时重新分组(8 头/栏)。监测了小牛在生命早期从奶嘴桶独立进食以及在分组后从自动喂食器进食的能力。在生命的头 3 周内,记录了小牛的健康状况、采食量和体重增加情况。在分组和重新分组后的头 24 小时内,从视频中连续记录活动和社会互动情况(由于夜间可见度问题,仅观察了 12 小时的相互梳理、干草消耗和社交玩耍)。在接触不同住房处理的期间,小牛的采食量和体重增加没有差异,但成对饲养的小牛腹泻天数较少[4.1 天比 5.6 天;PH 比 IH;标准误差(SE)= 0.58]。与之前单独饲养的小牛相比,之前成对饲养的小牛在初次分组(9.8 小时/天比 5.7 小时/天;PH 比 IH;SE = 0.83)和重新分组(11.3 小时/天比 9.1 小时/天;PH 比 IH;SE = 1.1)后,花更多的时间进行社会性躺卧(与另一头小牛在 1 个体长内)。我们没有发现之前的社会接触对刷子使用持续时间(31.5 分钟/天;SE = 4.2)、干草进食(5.1 分钟/12 小时;SE = 1.6)、相互梳理(4.1 分钟/12 小时;SE = 0.16)或社交玩耍(0.52 分钟/12 小时;SE = 0.19)有任何影响,无论是初次分组还是重新分组后。然而,之前成对饲养的小牛在重新分组后倾向于有更多的躺卧时间。这些结果表明,生命早期在最初几周的社会群体形成前进行社会接触,可能不会极大地影响围栏内的活动或向群体住房过渡后的主动社会互动。然而,持续的社会性躺卧时间差异表明,生命早期的社会接触可能会影响小牛在群体形成后的整体舒适度。