Cox Hatcher G, Hill J Bradford, Colon Anthony F, Abbasi Pooyan, Giladi Aviram M, Katz Ryan D
The Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
The Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD; MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD.
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Dec;46(12):1064-1070. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
The A2 and A4 pulleys of the flexor tendon system have traditionally been considered critical components of efficient digital flexion. This dogma has recently been challenged. Using fresh human cadaveric hands and a model to measure force and excursion, we sought to clarify the clinical importance of releasing different pulleys.
Combinations of A1, A2, and A4 pulleys were released on the index, middle, ring, and little fingers of fresh, cadaveric hands. The excursion was measured as the distance the tendon was pulled by the motor to achieve palm touchdown. The force applied by the motor was constant (25 N); work was derived from the product of force and excursion (distance). The change in excursion and work needed to achieve palm touchdown before and after pulley release was measured. Excursion varies among digits and specimens at baseline; therefore, the percentage change from the intact state was used to compare groups. We compared A2 versus A1, A4 versus A1, A4 versus A2, A1 + A2 versus A2, and A1 + A4 versus A4.
Isolated A2 or A4 release had the greatest individual impact on the excursion (4.77% ± 1.52% and 3.88% ± 1.93%, respectively). When A1 was released with A2 (9.90% ± 2.52%), the additional impact on the excursion was significant; however, when A1 was released with A4 (2.63% ± 2.81%), the impact was marginal. No clinically or statistically significant change in the work of flexion was detected.
A1 release was clinically significant when added to A2 release but not when added to A4 release. Sacrifice of the A2 and A4 pulleys resulted in a statistically significant, but clinically negligible, difference in flexor tendon excursion. These data suggest that the A1 pulley should be preserved when other proximal pulley components are likely to be compromised. These data also add further support to the concept that the A2 pulley or the A4 pulley can be released as needed for optimal tenorrhaphy.
During flexor tendon repair, the length of contiguous pulley release may have more impact on final tendon excursion than which specific pulleys are released.
屈肌腱系统的A2和A4滑车传统上被认为是实现有效手指屈曲的关键组成部分。这一教条最近受到了挑战。我们使用新鲜的人体尸体手和一个测量力与移动距离的模型,试图阐明松解不同滑车的临床重要性。
在新鲜尸体手的示指、中指、环指和小指上松解A1、A2和A4滑车的不同组合。移动距离通过肌腱被电机拉动以实现手掌触地的距离来测量。电机施加的力恒定为25 N;功由力与移动距离(距离)的乘积得出。测量滑车松解前后实现手掌触地所需的移动距离和功的变化。基线时各手指和标本的移动距离存在差异;因此,使用与完整状态相比的百分比变化来比较各组。我们比较了A2与A1、A4与A1、A4与A2、A1 + A2与A2以及A1 + A4与A4。
单独松解A2或A4对移动距离的个体影响最大(分别为4.77% ± 1.52%和3.88% ± 1.93%)。当A1与A2一起松解时(9.90% ± 2.52%),对移动距离的额外影响显著;然而,当A1与A4一起松解时(2.63% ± 2.81%),影响很小。未检测到屈曲功有临床或统计学上的显著变化。
A1松解与A2松解一起时具有临床意义,但与A4松解一起时则不然。牺牲A2和A4滑车在屈肌腱移动距离上导致了统计学上显著但临床上可忽略不计的差异。这些数据表明,当其他近端滑车组件可能受损时,应保留A1滑车。这些数据也进一步支持了根据需要松解A2滑车或A4滑车以实现最佳肌腱缝合的概念。
在屈肌腱修复过程中,连续松解滑车的长度可能比松解哪些特定滑车对最终肌腱移动距离的影响更大。