Suppr超能文献

减少和打破大学生久坐行为的可行性:试点试验与过程评估

Feasibility of Reducing and Breaking Up University Students' Sedentary Behaviour: Pilot Trial and Process Evaluation.

作者信息

Castro Oscar, Vergeer Ineke, Bennie Jason, Biddle Stuart J H

机构信息

Physically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ-PALs), Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia.

Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 10;12:661994. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661994. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Accumulating high levels of sedentary behaviour has been linked to poor health outcomes. This study examined the feasibility and preliminary, short-term effects of a theory-based intervention aimed at reducing total and prolonged sedentary behaviour in University students. A quasi-experimental (pre-post) pilot study. Methods: Nine ambulatory undergraduate students (Mean age = 22 ± 2.32) participated in a one-on-one session, including an educational component around the health effects of sedentary behaviour and three distinct activities (feedback, "pros and cons" exercise, and suggested behaviour change strategies). In addition, automated daily text messages targeting sedentary behaviour were sent for 6 days (four messages per day at fixed intervals). The Behaviour Change Wheel framework guided the intervention design process. Outcomes were assessed over 6 days in pre- and post-intervention periods and included accelerometer-based (activPAL) and self-reported (Nightly-Week-U) total sedentary time, as well as accelerometer-based number of steps and prolonged sedentary time. Students completed a process evaluation interview upon completing the trial. From pre- to post-intervention, there was a significant reduction in accelerometer-based total and prolonged sedentary time during weekend days. In addition, there was a significant increase in accelerometer-based standing time and stepping during weekend days. There were no statistically significant changes in accelerometer-based sedentary time, standing time or number of steps during weekdays. Process evaluation results indicated that the intervention and its assessment is feasible. Reductions in sedentary time were likely to be mediated by positive changes in the student's reflective and automatic motivation. Findings from this small, short-term intervention suggest that a single one-on-one session, together with automated text messages, may help University students reduce sedentary behaviour and enhance movement during weekend days. Additional strategies to maximise the intervention effects are discussed (e.g., establishing a collaboration with University staff, introducing sit-to-stand desks, and/or facilitating social support). A randomised control trial assessing sedentary behaviour over a longer period is needed to adequately study the intervention's effectiveness.

摘要

久坐行为水平不断累积已被证明与不良健康后果相关。本研究探讨了一种基于理论的干预措施的可行性及其初步的短期效果,该干预旨在减少大学生的总久坐时间和长时间久坐行为。一项准实验性(干预前后)试点研究。方法:九名非卧床本科生(平均年龄=22±2.32岁)参加了一对一辅导课程,包括围绕久坐行为对健康影响的教育内容以及三项不同活动(反馈、“利弊”练习和建议的行为改变策略)。此外,针对久坐行为的自动化每日短信发送6天(每天固定时间发送四条短信)。行为改变轮框架指导了干预设计过程。在干预前后的6天内对结果进行评估,包括基于加速度计(activPAL)和自我报告(Nightly-Week-U)的总久坐时间,以及基于加速度计的步数和长时间久坐时间。学生在完成试验后进行了过程评估访谈。从干预前到干预后,周末基于加速度计的总久坐时间和长时间久坐时间显著减少。此外,周末基于加速度计的站立时间和步数显著增加。工作日期间,基于加速度计的久坐时间、站立时间或步数没有统计学上的显著变化。过程评估结果表明,该干预及其评估是可行的。久坐时间的减少可能是由学生反思性和自动性动机的积极变化介导的。这项小型短期干预的结果表明,单次一对一辅导课程与自动化短信相结合,可能有助于大学生减少周末的久坐行为并增加运动量。文中讨论了最大化干预效果的其他策略(例如,与大学工作人员建立合作关系、引入坐站两用办公桌和/或促进社会支持)。需要进行一项随机对照试验,在更长时间内评估久坐行为,以充分研究该干预措施的有效性。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of Reducing and Breaking Up University Students' Sedentary Behaviour: Pilot Trial and Process Evaluation.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 10;12:661994. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661994. eCollection 2021.
2
8
Introducing sit-stand desks increases classroom standing time among university students.
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Nov 9;8:232-237. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.10.019. eCollection 2017 Dec.

本文引用的文献

3
University students' knowledge, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and barriers related to reducing sedentary behavior: a qualitative study.
J Am Coll Health. 2022 May-Jun;70(4):1146-1153. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1786098. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
5
How Sedentary Are University Students? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Prev Sci. 2020 Apr;21(3):332-343. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01093-8.
7
Stand Up, Students! Decisional Cues Reduce Sedentary Behavior in University Students.
Front Public Health. 2019 Aug 20;7:230. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00230. eCollection 2019.
9
Should I sit or stand: likelihood of adherence to messages about reducing sitting time.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 3;19(1):871. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7189-z.
10
Problematic Use of Mobile Phones in Australia…Is It Getting Worse?
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 12;10:105. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00105. eCollection 2019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验