• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少工作中的久坐:SMArT Work(Stand More At Work)干预措施的过程评估。

Reducing sitting at work: process evaluation of the SMArT Work (Stand More At Work) intervention.

机构信息

Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield,, QLD, 4300, Australia.

Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 May 13;21(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04300-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-04300-7
PMID:32404181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7218819/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Office-based workers accumulate high amounts of sitting time. Stand More At Work (SMArT Work) aimed to reduce occupational sitting time and a cluster randomised controlled trial demonstrated it was successful in achieving this aim. The purpose of this paper is to present the process evaluation of the SMArT Work intervention.

METHODS

Questionnaire data were collected from intervention participants at 6 months (n = 58) and 12 months (n = 55). Questionnaires sought feedback on the different components of the intervention (education, height-adjustable desk, Darma cushion, behaviour feedback, progress chats (coaching) with research team, action planning/goal setting diary) and experiences of evaluation measures. Control participants (n = 37) were asked via questionnaire at 12-month follow-up about the impact of the study on their behaviour and any lifestyle changes made during the study. Participants from both arms were invited to focus groups to gain a deeper understanding of their experiences on completion of 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Focus group and questionnaire data showed a positive attitude towards the height-adjustable workstation with a high proportion of participants using it every day (62%). Most participants (92%) felt the education seminar increased their awareness of the health consequences of too much sitting and motivated them to change their behaviour. Receiving feedback on their sitting time and support from the research team also encouraged behaviour change. The Darma cushion and action planning/goal setting diary were seen to be less helpful for behaviour change. Benefits experienced included fewer aches and pains, improved cognitive functioning, increased productivity, more energy and positive feelings about general health.

CONCLUSIONS

Key elements of the programme identified as facilitating behaviour change were the educational seminar, the height-adjustable workstation, behavioural feedback and regular contact with research staff through regular progress chats.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN: ISRCTN10967042. Registered on 2 February 2015.

摘要

背景

办公室工作人员久坐时间过长。“工作中多站”(SMArT Work)项目旨在减少职业性久坐时间,一项集群随机对照试验证实其成功达到了这一目标。本文旨在介绍“工作中多站”干预的过程评估。

方法

在干预的 6 个月(n=58)和 12 个月(n=55)时,从干预参与者处收集问卷调查数据。问卷旨在获取关于干预不同组成部分(教育、可调节高度的桌子、达玛坐垫、行为反馈、与研究团队的进展对话(指导)、行动计划/目标设定日记)和评估措施的经验反馈。在 12 个月的随访中,通过问卷调查询问对照组(n=37)参与者研究对其行为的影响,以及在研究期间是否发生了生活方式的改变。在完成 12 个月随访后,邀请两组参与者参加焦点小组,以深入了解他们的体验。

结果

焦点小组和问卷调查数据显示,参与者对可调节工作站的态度积极,其中大部分人(62%)每天都在使用它。大多数参与者(92%)认为教育研讨会提高了他们对久坐过多带来的健康后果的认识,并促使他们改变行为。收到坐姿时间反馈和研究团队的支持也鼓励了行为改变。达玛坐垫和行动计划/目标设定日记对行为改变的帮助较小。参与者体验到的益处包括疼痛减少、认知功能改善、生产力提高、更多的精力和对整体健康的积极感受。

结论

促进行为改变的项目关键要素包括教育研讨会、可调节工作站、行为反馈以及通过定期进展对话与研究人员的定期联系。

试验注册

ISRCTN: ISRCTN80430241。2015 年 2 月 2 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b0/7218819/4b973a31f068/13063_2020_4300_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b0/7218819/4b973a31f068/13063_2020_4300_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b0/7218819/4b973a31f068/13063_2020_4300_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reducing sitting at work: process evaluation of the SMArT Work (Stand More At Work) intervention.减少工作中的久坐:SMArT Work(Stand More At Work)干预措施的过程评估。
Trials. 2020 May 13;21(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04300-7.
2
Stand More AT Work (SMArT Work): using the behaviour change wheel to develop an intervention to reduce sitting time in the workplace.工作时多站站(SMArT Work):使用行为改变轮开发干预措施以减少工作场所中的久坐时间。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 6;18(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5187-1.
3
A multicomponent intervention to reduce daily sitting time in office workers: the SMART Work & Life three-arm cluster RCT.一项针对减少上班族每日久坐时间的多成分干预措施:SMART 工作与生活三臂群组 RCT。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Sep;11(6):1-229. doi: 10.3310/DNYC2141.
4
Providing NHS staff with height-adjustable workstations and behaviour change strategies to reduce workplace sitting time: protocol for the Stand More AT (SMArT) Work cluster randomised controlled trial.为英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)工作人员提供可调节高度的工作站及行为改变策略以减少工作场所久坐时间:“多站立于工作中”(SMArT)工作群组随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 9;15:1219. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2532-5.
5
Participant and workplace champion experiences of an intervention designed to reduce sitting time in desk-based workers: SMART work & life.旨在减少伏案工作者久坐时间的一项干预措施(SMART工作与生活)的参与者及工作场所倡导者的体验
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Nov 30;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01539-6.
6
A three arm cluster randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life intervention for reducing daily sitting time in office workers: study protocol.一项三臂群组随机对照试验,旨在测试 SMART 工作与生活干预在减少上班族日常久坐时间方面的有效性和成本效益:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Sep 14;18(1):1120. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6017-1.
7
What strategies do desk-based workers choose to reduce sitting time and how well do they work? Findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial.久坐办公族选择了哪些策略来减少久坐时间,这些策略效果如何?一项整群随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Oct 12;15(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0731-z.
8
Effectiveness of the Stand More AT (SMArT) Work intervention: cluster randomised controlled trial.站立更多 AT(SMArT)工作干预的有效性: 集群随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2018 Oct 10;363:k3870. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3870.
9
Reducing occupational sitting: Workers' perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention.减少工作中的久坐时间:工人对参与多成分干预措施的看法。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 May 30;14(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y.
10
The Dynamic Work study: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial of an occupational health intervention aimed at reducing sitting time in office workers.动态工作研究:一项针对减少办公人员久坐时间的职业健康干预措施的群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 13;19(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6467-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The Physical Activity at Work (PAW) Program in Thai Office Workers: Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Study.泰国上班族工作场所身体活动(PAW)项目:混合方法过程评估研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 2;9:e57604. doi: 10.2196/57604.
2
Are there compensatory behaviors in response to a sit-stand desk intervention?是否存在针对坐站两用办公桌干预措施的代偿行为?
J Occup Health. 2024 Jan 4;66(1). doi: 10.1093/joccuh/uiae067.
3
Implementation and engagement of the SMART Work & Life sitting reduction intervention: an exploratory analysis on intervention effectiveness.

本文引用的文献

1
Controversies in the Science of Sedentary Behaviour and Health: Insights, Perspectives and Future directions from the 2018 Queensland Sedentary Behaviour Think Tank.久坐行为与健康科学中的争议:2018 年昆士兰久坐行为智库的见解、观点和未来方向。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 27;16(23):4762. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234762.
2
Sedentary Behavior and Health: Update from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee.久坐行为与健康:2018 年身体活动指南咨询委员会的最新更新。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jun;51(6):1227-1241. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001935.
3
Effectiveness of the Stand More AT (SMArT) Work intervention: cluster randomised controlled trial.
实施和参与 SMART 工作与生活坐姿减少干预:干预效果的探索性分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Dec 19;20(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01548-5.
4
Participant and workplace champion experiences of an intervention designed to reduce sitting time in desk-based workers: SMART work & life.旨在减少伏案工作者久坐时间的一项干预措施(SMART工作与生活)的参与者及工作场所倡导者的体验
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Nov 30;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01539-6.
5
Providing office workers with height-adjustable workstation to reduce and interrupt workplace sitting time: protocol for the Stand Up for Healthy Aging (SUFHA) cluster randomized controlled trial.为办公室工作人员提供可调节高度的工作站以减少和打断工作场所久坐时间:站立促进健康老龄化(SUFHA)整群随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2023 Jun 6;24(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07407-9.
6
Feasibility and Acceptability of an Internet of Things-Enabled Sedentary Behavior Intervention: Mixed Methods Study.物联网支持的久坐行为干预的可行性和可接受性:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 27;25:e43502. doi: 10.2196/43502.
7
The Frail-LESS (LEss Sitting and Sarcopenia in Frail older adults) intervention to improve sarcopenia and maintain independent living via reductions in prolonged sitting: a randomised controlled feasibility trial protocol.“体弱老人少坐少肌少症”(Frail-LESS)干预措施:通过减少久坐来改善肌少症并维持独立生活——一项随机对照可行性试验方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Jan 7;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01225-7.
8
The structured health intervention for truckers (SHIFT) cluster randomised controlled trial: a mixed methods process evaluation.结构化健康干预措施在卡车司机(SHIFT)中的群组随机对照试验:混合方法的过程评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Jul 7;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01316-x.
9
Feasibility of Reducing and Breaking Up University Students' Sedentary Behaviour: Pilot Trial and Process Evaluation.减少和打破大学生久坐行为的可行性:试点试验与过程评估
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 10;12:661994. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661994. eCollection 2021.
站立更多 AT(SMArT)工作干预的有效性: 集群随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2018 Oct 10;363:k3870. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3870.
4
"Could you sit down please?" A qualitative analysis of employees' experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings.“请坐好吗?”对员工在通常坐姿的工作场所会议中站立体验的定性分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0198483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198483. eCollection 2018.
5
Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis.久坐行为与全因、心血管疾病和癌症死亡率以及 2 型糖尿病发病风险的关系:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;33(9):811-829. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
6
Stand by Me: Qualitative Insights into the Ease of Use of Adjustable Workstations.《伴我同行:对可调式工作站易用性的定性洞察》
AIMS Public Health. 2016 Aug 30;3(3):644-662. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.3.644. eCollection 2016.
7
Stand More AT Work (SMArT Work): using the behaviour change wheel to develop an intervention to reduce sitting time in the workplace.工作时多站站(SMArT Work):使用行为改变轮开发干预措施以减少工作场所中的久坐时间。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 6;18(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5187-1.
8
Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women.体育活动是否能减弱甚至消除久坐时间与死亡率之间的有害关联?一项针对超过 100 万男性和女性数据的综合荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1302-10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30370-1. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
9
Too much sitting and all-cause mortality: is there a causal link?久坐与全因死亡率:是否存在因果关系?
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 26;16:635. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3307-3.
10
Providing NHS staff with height-adjustable workstations and behaviour change strategies to reduce workplace sitting time: protocol for the Stand More AT (SMArT) Work cluster randomised controlled trial.为英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)工作人员提供可调节高度的工作站及行为改变策略以减少工作场所久坐时间:“多站立于工作中”(SMArT)工作群组随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 9;15:1219. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2532-5.