Suppr超能文献

使用自我监测来减少成年人久坐行为的干预措施的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of interventions using self-monitoring to reduce sedentary behavior in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Movement and Sport Sciences Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Aug 13;16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0824-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sedentary behavior occurs largely subconsciously, and thus specific behavior change techniques are needed to increase conscious awareness of sedentary behavior. Chief amongst these behavior change techniques is self-monitoring of sedentary behavior. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the short-term effectiveness of existing interventions using self-monitoring to reduce sedentary behavior in adults.

METHODS

Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library) and grey literature (Google Scholar and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) were searched to identify appropriate intervention studies. Only (cluster-)randomized controlled trials that 1) assessed the short-term effectiveness of an intervention aimed at the reduction of sedentary behavior, 2) used self-monitoring as a behavior change technique, and 3) were conducted in a sample of adults with an average age ≥ 18 years, were eligible for inclusion. Relevant data were extracted, and Hedge's g was used as the measure of effect sizes. Random effects models were performed to conduct the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen intervention studies with a total of 2800 participants met the inclusion criteria. Results of the meta-analyses showed that interventions using self-monitoring significantly reduced total sedentary time (Hedges g = 0,32; 95% CI = 0,14 - 0,50; p = 0,001) and occupational sedentary time (Hedge's g = 0,56; 95% CI = 0,07 - 0,90; p = 0,02) on the short term. Subgroup analyses showed that significant intervention effects were only found if objective self-monitoring tools were used (g = 0,40; 95% CI = 0,19 - 0,60; p < 0,001), and if the intervention only targeted sedentary behavior (g = 0,45; 95% CI = 0,15-0,75; p = 0,004). No significant intervention effects were found on the number of breaks in sedentary behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the small sample sizes, and the large heterogeneity, results of the current meta-analysis suggested that interventions using self-monitoring as a behavior change technique have the potential to reduce sedentary behavior in adults. If future - preferably large-scale studies - can prove that the reductions in sedentary behavior are attributable to self-monitoring and can confirm the sustainability of this behavior change, multi-level interventions including self-monitoring may impact public health by reducing sedentary behavior.

摘要

背景

久坐行为在很大程度上是无意识发生的,因此需要特定的行为改变技术来提高对久坐行为的意识。这些行为改变技术中最重要的是对久坐行为进行自我监测。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估使用自我监测来减少成年人久坐行为的现有干预措施的短期效果。

方法

检索了四个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 The Cochrane Library)和灰色文献(Google Scholar 和国际临床试验注册平台),以确定适当的干预研究。只有(簇)随机对照试验符合以下标准:1)评估旨在减少久坐行为的干预措施的短期效果,2)使用自我监测作为行为改变技术,3)在平均年龄≥18 岁的成年人样本中进行,才有资格纳入。提取相关数据,并使用 Hedge's g 作为效应量的度量。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

共有 19 项干预研究,总计 2800 名参与者符合纳入标准。荟萃分析结果表明,使用自我监测的干预措施可显著减少总久坐时间(Hedges g=0.32;95%置信区间=0.14-0.50;p=0.001)和职业久坐时间(Hedge's g=0.56;95%置信区间=0.07-0.90;p=0.02)。亚组分析表明,如果使用客观的自我监测工具(g=0.40;95%置信区间=0.19-0.60;p<0.001),并且干预仅针对久坐行为(g=0.45;95%置信区间=0.15-0.75;p=0.004),则干预效果显著。在久坐行为中断次数方面,没有发现显著的干预效果。

结论

尽管样本量较小,异质性较大,但本次荟萃分析的结果表明,使用自我监测作为行为改变技术的干预措施有可能减少成年人的久坐行为。如果未来(最好是大规模)研究能够证明减少久坐行为归因于自我监测,并证实这种行为改变的可持续性,那么包括自我监测在内的多层面干预措施可能通过减少久坐行为来影响公共健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b4/6693254/c73c030b7840/12966_2019_824_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验