• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用聚氨酯植入物进行盂唇重建。

Labral reconstruction with polyurethane implant.

作者信息

Tey-Pons Marc, Capurro Bruno, Torres-Eguia Raúl, Marqués-López Fernando, Leon-García Alfonso, Marín-Peña Oliver

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona 08003, Spain.

iMove Traumatología, Clínica Mi Tres Torres, Barcelona 08017, Spain.

出版信息

J Hip Preserv Surg. 2021 Jun 23;8(Suppl 1):i34-i40. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnab030. eCollection 2021 Jun.

DOI:10.1093/jhps/hnab030
PMID:34178369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8221378/
Abstract

Surgical treatment of labral injuries has shifted from debridement to preservation over the past decades. Primary repair and secondary augmentation or reconstruction techniques are aimed at restoring the labral seal and preserving or improving contact mechanics. Currently, the standard of care for non-repairable tears favours the use of auto- or allografts. As an alternative, we present our initial experience using a synthetic, off-the-shelf polyurethane scaffold for augmentation and reconstruction of segmental labral tissue loss or irreparable labral damage. Three patients aged 37-44 (two male, one female) with femoroacetabular impingement without associated dysplasia (Wiberg > 25°) or osteoarthritis (Tönnis <2) were included in this series. Labral reconstruction (one case) and augmentation (two cases) were performed using a synthetic polyurethane scaffold developed for meniscal substitution (Actifit, Orteq Ltd, London, UK) and adapted to the hip. Clinical results were analysed with patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) using non-arthritic hip score (NAHS) and daily live activities hip outcome score (DLA HOS) and magnetic resonance images (MRI) at 2- and 4-year follow-up. Clinically improvement was seen in all PROMs at 4 years. The NAHS scores improved from 57.7 to 82.3 (50.9% improvement) and HOS from 59 to 79.3 (35.3% improvement). Last follow-up MRIs confirmed the presence of the scaffold; however, the scaffold signal was still hyperintense compared to native labrum. There was no shrinkage in any scaffold and no progression to hip osteoarthritis seen. Reconstruction or augmentation of segmental labral defects with a polyurethane scaffold may be an effective procedure. At 4 years after implantation, our small cases series resulted in improved hip joint function, reduced pain and scaffold preservation on follow-up imaging.

摘要

在过去几十年中,髋臼唇损伤的手术治疗已从清创术转向保留术。初次修复以及二次增强或重建技术旨在恢复髋臼唇密封,并保留或改善接触力学。目前,对于不可修复的撕裂伤,标准治疗方法倾向于使用自体移植物或同种异体移植物。作为一种替代方法,我们介绍了使用现成的合成聚氨酯支架来增强和重建节段性髋臼唇组织缺损或不可修复的髋臼唇损伤的初步经验。本系列纳入了3例年龄在37 - 44岁之间的患者(2例男性,1例女性),均患有股骨髋臼撞击症,无相关发育异常(Wiberg角>25°)或骨关节炎(Tönnis分级<2级)。使用一种为半月板置换开发的合成聚氨酯支架(Actifit,Orteq有限公司,英国伦敦)并针对髋关节进行适配,实施了髋臼唇重建(1例)和增强(2例)手术。在2年和4年随访时,使用患者报告结局(PROMs),通过非关节炎髋关节评分(NAHS)和日常生活活动髋关节结局评分(DLA HOS)以及磁共振成像(MRI)对临床结果进行分析。4年时所有PROMs均显示临床改善。NAHS评分从57.7提高到82.3(提高了50.9%),HOS评分从59提高到79.3(提高了35.3%)。最后一次随访的MRI证实了支架的存在;然而,与天然髋臼唇相比,支架信号仍为高信号。任何支架均未出现收缩,也未进展为髋关节骨关节炎。用聚氨酯支架重建或增强节段性髋臼唇缺损可能是一种有效的手术方法。植入后4年,我们的小病例系列显示髋关节功能改善、疼痛减轻且随访成像显示支架得以保留。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/8221378/7f8897b2a480/hnab030f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/8221378/726ccab147bf/hnab030f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/8221378/412ee1720089/hnab030f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/8221378/544ea200f34c/hnab030f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/8221378/e8f3ec2a0035/hnab030f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/8221378/7f8897b2a480/hnab030f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/8221378/726ccab147bf/hnab030f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/8221378/412ee1720089/hnab030f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/8221378/544ea200f34c/hnab030f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/8221378/e8f3ec2a0035/hnab030f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/8221378/7f8897b2a480/hnab030f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Labral reconstruction with polyurethane implant.使用聚氨酯植入物进行盂唇重建。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2021 Jun 23;8(Suppl 1):i34-i40. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnab030. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Arthroscopic labral reconstruction is superior to segmental resection for irreparable labral tears in the hip: a matched-pair controlled study with minimum 2-year follow-up.关节镜下盂唇重建术优于节段切除术治疗髋关节不可修复的盂唇撕裂:一项最少 2 年随访的配对对照研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):122-30. doi: 10.1177/0363546513508256. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
3
Labral Preservation: Outcomes Following Labrum Augmentation Versus Labrum Reconstruction.保留盂唇:盂唇增强与盂唇重建的结果。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Sep;34(9):2604-2611. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.04.021.
4
Circumferential Labral Reconstruction for Irreparable Labral Tears in the Primary Setting: Minimum 2-Year Outcomes With a Nested Matched-Pair Labral Repair Control Group.原发性不可修复性盂唇撕裂的环形盂唇重建:与嵌套配对盂唇修复对照组的至少 2 年结果。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Oct;36(10):2583-2597. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.014. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
5
Clinical and Radiographic Predictors for Unsalvageable Labral Tear at the Time of Initial Hip Arthroscopic Management for Femoroacetabular Impingement.在初次髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症时,预测不可挽救的盂唇撕裂的临床和影像学指标。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(9):2029-2037. doi: 10.1177/0363546519856018. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
6
Improvement in Functional Outcome Scores Despite Persistent Pain With 1 Year of Nonsurgical Management for Acetabular Labral Tears With or Without Femoroacetabular Impingement.尽管存在持续性疼痛,非手术治疗髋臼唇撕裂伴或不伴股骨髋臼撞击 1 年后功能结局评分仍改善。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):536-542. doi: 10.1177/0363546518814484. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
7
Arthroscopic Circumferential Acetabular Labral Reconstruction for Irreparable Labra in the Revision Setting: Patient-Reported Outcome Scores and Rate of Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.关节镜下髋臼唇缘重建术治疗翻修术中不可修复的髋臼唇缘:至少 2 年随访时患者报告的结局评分和达到最小临床重要差异的比例。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jun;49(7):1750-1758. doi: 10.1177/03635465211005742. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
8
Hip Labral Reconstruction With a Polyurethane Scaffold: Restoration of Femoroacetabular Contact Biomechanics.使用聚氨酯支架进行髋臼盂唇重建:股骨髋臼接触生物力学的恢复
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Sep 14;10(9):23259671221118831. doi: 10.1177/23259671221118831. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Selective Debridement With Labral Preservation Using Narrow Indications in the Hip: Minimum 5-Year Outcomes With a Matched-Pair Labral Repair Control Group.采用狭窄适应证在髋关节中进行保留盂唇的选择性清创术:与配对盂唇修复对照组对比的至少5年随访结果
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;46(2):297-304. doi: 10.1177/0363546517739566. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
10
Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Hip Labral Repair Using Looped Versus Pierced Suture Techniques.使用环形与穿刺缝合技术进行关节镜下髋关节盂唇修复后的临床结果
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1683-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546515581469. Epub 2015 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Polyurethane Scaffold vs Fascia Lata Autograft for Hip Labral Reconstruction: Comparison of Femoroacetabular Biomechanics.用于髋关节盂唇重建的聚氨酯支架与阔筋膜自体移植:股骨髋臼生物力学比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Feb 20;11(2):23259671221150632. doi: 10.1177/23259671221150632. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Mechanical and Biological Evaluation of Melt-Electrowritten Polycaprolactone Scaffolds for Acetabular Labrum Restoration.熔融静电纺丝聚己内酯支架修复髋臼唇的机械和生物学评价。
Cells. 2022 Oct 31;11(21):3450. doi: 10.3390/cells11213450.
3
Hip Labral Reconstruction With a Polyurethane Scaffold: Restoration of Femoroacetabular Contact Biomechanics.

本文引用的文献

1
The Efficacy of Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.盂唇重建术的疗效:一项系统评价。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Feb 16;9(2):2325967120977088. doi: 10.1177/2325967120977088. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
Graft Options in Hip Labral Reconstruction.髋关节盂唇重建中的移植物选择
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Feb;14(1):16-26. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09690-4.
3
Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.髋关节镜检查的中远期疗效:一项系统评价。
使用聚氨酯支架进行髋臼盂唇重建:股骨髋臼接触生物力学的恢复
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Sep 14;10(9):23259671221118831. doi: 10.1177/23259671221118831. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Editorial (ESSKA-SHPS supplement).社论(ESSKA-SHPS增刊)。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2021 Jun 23;8(Suppl 1):i2-i3. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnab047. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Arthroscopy. 2021 Mar;37(3):1011-1025. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
4
Functional and magnetic resonance imaging outcome after polyurethane meniscal scaffold implantation following partial meniscectomy.部分半月板切除术后应用聚氨酯半月板支架植入的功能和磁共振成像结果。
Int Orthop. 2021 Apr;45(4):971-975. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04844-y. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
5
Meniscal scaffold for the treatment of partial meniscal defect-clinical and radiological outcomes in a two-year follow-up.用于治疗部分半月板缺损的半月板支架-两年随访的临床和放射学结果。
Int Orthop. 2021 Apr;45(4):977-983. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04811-7. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
6
Acetabular Labral Reconstruction with Iliotibial Band Autograft: Outcome and Survivorship at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.髋臼盂唇重建术采用阔筋膜张肌髂胫束移植物:至少 10 年随访的结果和存活率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Sep 16;102(18):1581-1587. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01499.
7
Polyurethane Meniscal Scaffold for the Treatment of Partial Meniscal Deficiency: 5-Year Follow-up Outcomes: A European Multicentric Study.用于治疗半月板部分缺损的聚氨酯半月板支架:5年随访结果:一项欧洲多中心研究
Am J Sports Med. 2020 May;48(6):1347-1355. doi: 10.1177/0363546520913528. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
8
Best Practice Guidelines for Hip Arthroscopy in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Results of a Delphi Process.髋关节撞击综合征髋关节镜检查的最佳实践指南:德尔菲法的结果。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jan 15;28(2):81-89. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00041.
9
Primary Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Labral Reconstruction: Is There a Difference Between an Autograft and Allograft?伴有盂唇重建的初次髋关节关节镜手术:自体移植与异体移植之间存在差异吗?
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Mar 25;7(3):2325967119833715. doi: 10.1177/2325967119833715. eCollection 2019 Mar.
10
Graft choices for acetabular labral reconstruction.髋臼盂唇重建的移植物选择
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018 Sep 27;5(4):329-338. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hny033. eCollection 2018 Dec.