[Comparison of clinical outcomes between arthroscopic modified Mason-Allen repair and suture-bridge repair for medium-size rotator cuff tears].

OBJECTIVE

To observe and compare the clinical outcomes between arthroscopic modified Mason-Allen repair and suture-bridge repair for medium-size rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

From January 2017 to January 2018, 22 patients with medium-size rotator cuff tears underwent arthroscopic modified Mason-Allen repair. There were 9 males and 13 females with an average age of (57.14±10.26) years. From February 2018 to January 2019, 20 patients with medium-size rotator cuff tears underwent arthroscopic suture-bridge repair. There were 6 males and 14 females with an average age of (57.75±7.57) years. The preoperative and postoperative clinical function was assessed by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant score system. The healing status of repaired rotator cuff was assessed using MRI.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up, and the duration ranged from 24 to 33 months, with a mean of (26.38±2.29) months. In modified Mason-Allen group, AS###ES score and Constant score increased from (45.22±7.58) and (58.72±9.26) preoperatively to (96.89±3.49) and (93.18± 3.20) postoperatively. In suture-bridge group, ASES score and Constant score increased from(47.33±7.50) and (60.05±11.76) scores to (97.58±3.43) and (93.85±3.15). There were no significant differences in ASES score and Constant score between the two groups before and after operation. There were no significant differences in rotator cuff healing between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Both arthroscopic modified Mason-Allen and suture-bridge repair for treatment of medium-size rotator cuff tears could obtain good clinical outcomes, and there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two techniques.