Becker William C, Li Yu, Caniglia Ellen C, Vickers-Smith Rachel, Feinberg Termeh, Marshall Brandon D L, Edelman E Jennifer
VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
AIDS Care. 2022 Apr;34(4):469-477. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2021.1944597. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
Concomitant with expanded legalization, cannabis is increasingly used to treat chronic pain among persons with HIV (PWH), despite equivocal benefit in research limited by small sample sizes and short duration of follow-up. To address these limitations, among a sample of PWH with pain interference enrolled in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study, we performed a target trial emulation study to compare the impact of four cannabis use strategies on pain interference. Among those receiving long-term opioid therapy (LTOT), we also explored impact of these strategies on ≥ 25% LTOT dose reduction. Among the analytic sample ( = 1284), the majority were men with a mean age of 50. Approximately 31% used cannabis and 12% received LTOT at baseline. Adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, cannabis use in any of 4 longitudinal patterns was not associated with resolved pain interference over 12- to 24-month follow-up. Among 153 participants receiving LTOT at baseline, cannabis use at both baseline and follow-up was negatively associated with LTOT dose reduction compared to no use at both baseline and follow-up. These findings support other observational studies finding no association between cannabis use and improved chronic pain or LTOT reduction among PWH.
随着大麻合法化范围的扩大,尽管在样本量小和随访时间短的研究中其益处尚不明确,但大麻越来越多地被用于治疗艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)的慢性疼痛。为解决这些局限性,在参加退伍军人老龄化队列研究的有疼痛干扰的PWH样本中,我们进行了一项目标试验模拟研究,以比较四种大麻使用策略对疼痛干扰的影响。在接受长期阿片类药物治疗(LTOT)的人群中,我们还探讨了这些策略对LTOT剂量降低≥25%的影响。在分析样本(n = 1284)中,大多数为男性,平均年龄50岁。基线时约31%的人使用大麻,12%的人接受LTOT。在调整人口统计学和临床因素后,在12至24个月的随访中,四种纵向模式中任何一种的大麻使用与疼痛干扰缓解均无关联。在基线时接受LTOT的153名参与者中,与基线和随访时均不使用大麻相比,基线和随访时均使用大麻与LTOT剂量降低呈负相关。这些发现支持了其他观察性研究,即在PWH中,大麻使用与慢性疼痛改善或LTOT降低之间无关联。