Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Int J Cancer. 2021 Oct 15;149(8):1576-1584. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33721. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
Pemetrexed is an important component of first line treatment in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. However, a limitation is the contraindication in patients with renal impairment due to hematological toxicity. Currently, it is unknown how to safely dose pemetrexed in these patients. The aim of our study was to elucidate the relationship between pemetrexed exposure and toxicity to support the development of a safe dosing regimen in patients with renal impairment. A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis was performed based on phase II study results in three patients with renal dysfunction, supplemented with data from 106 patients in early clinical studies. Findings were externally validated with data of different pemetrexed dosing regimens. Alternative dosing regimens were evaluated using the developed model. We found that pemetrexed toxicity was driven by the time above a toxicity threshold concentration. The threshold for vitamin-supplemented patients was 0.110 mg/mL (95% CI: 0.092-0.146 mg/mL). It was observed that in patients with renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]: <45 mL/min) the approved dose of 500 mg/m would yield a high probability of severe neutropenia in the range of 51.0% to 92.6%. A pemetrexed dose of 20 mg for patients (eGFR: 20 mL/min) is shown to be neutropenic-equivalent to the approved dose in patients with adequate renal function (eGFR: 90 mL/min), but would result in an approximately 13-fold lower area under the concentration-time curve. The pemetrexed exposure-toxicity relationship is explained by a toxicity threshold and substantially different from previously thought. Without prophylaxis for toxicity, it is unlikely that a therapeutic dose can be safely administered to patients with renal impairment.
培美曲塞是治疗非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者的一线治疗的重要组成部分。然而,由于血液学毒性,其在肾功能损害患者中的应用存在禁忌。目前,尚不清楚如何在这些患者中安全给予培美曲塞剂量。本研究的目的是阐明培美曲塞暴露与毒性之间的关系,以支持为肾功能损害患者制定安全的剂量方案。我们基于肾功能障碍患者的 II 期研究结果以及早期临床研究中 106 例患者的数据,进行了群体药代动力学/药效学分析。研究结果采用不同培美曲塞剂量方案的数据进行了外部验证。使用开发的模型评估了替代剂量方案。我们发现培美曲塞毒性是由毒性阈值浓度以上的时间驱动的。补充维生素的患者的阈值为 0.110mg/ml(95%CI:0.092-0.146mg/ml)。观察到肾功能损害患者(估计肾小球滤过率[eGFR]:<45ml/min),批准的 500mg/m剂量方案会导致严重中性粒细胞减少症的概率很高,范围为 51.0%至 92.6%。对于 eGFR:20ml/min的患者,培美曲塞 20mg 剂量与肾功能良好(eGFR:90ml/min)患者的批准剂量相当,但会导致浓度-时间曲线下面积降低约 13 倍。培美曲塞暴露-毒性关系由毒性阈值解释,与以前的想法有很大不同。没有毒性预防措施,肾功能损害患者不太可能安全给予治疗剂量。