• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度尼西亚转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者化疗中添加贝伐珠单抗的经济学评价。

Economic Evaluation of Adding Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Patients in Indonesia.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine Public Health and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):1921-1926. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.6.1921.

DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.6.1921
PMID:34181352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8418847/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Since 2016, bevacizumab has been widely used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Indonesia. Nevertheless, the high cost of bevacizumab has raised the question of whether the therapy is considered cost-effective and should be included in the national health insurance system. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the treatment of mCRC patients.

METHODS

A Markov model was applied using the perspective of the Indonesian healthcare system to assess cost-effectiveness. The health outcomes were expressed in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) using the validated EuroQoL-5D-5L instrument. Data for medical costs were collected from hospital billings in four hospitals located in three different cities in Indonesia. Meanwhile, data for utility were obtained from interviewing 90 patients who came to the hospital. We compared those mCRC patients who received chemotherapy alone either with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, versus patients who received the addition of bevacizumab.

RESULTS

With the perspective of societal, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of adding bevacizumab was USD 49,312 per QALY gained using secondary data and USD 28,446 per QALY using real world data.

CONCLUSION

Using either a healthcare or societal perspective, the addition of bevacizumab for mCRC treatment was considered not cost-effective.

摘要

目的

自 2016 年以来,贝伐珠单抗已被广泛用于治疗印度尼西亚转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)。然而,贝伐珠单抗的高昂价格引发了一个问题,即该疗法是否具有成本效益,是否应纳入国家健康保险体系。本研究旨在评估贝伐珠单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗治疗 mCRC 患者的成本效益。

方法

采用 Markov 模型,从印度尼西亚医疗保健系统的角度评估成本效益。使用经过验证的 EuroQoL-5D-5L 工具,健康结果以质量调整生命年(QALY)表示。医疗费用数据来自印度尼西亚四个城市的四家医院的住院费用。同时,使用效用数据通过访谈 90 名来医院的患者获得。我们将接受单独化疗(FOLFOX 或 FOLFIRI)的 mCRC 患者与接受贝伐珠单抗联合治疗的患者进行比较。

结果

从社会角度来看,使用二级数据,添加贝伐珠单抗的增量成本效益比(ICER)为每获得一个 QALY 增加 49312 美元,使用真实世界数据则为每获得一个 QALY 增加 28446 美元。

结论

无论从医疗保健还是社会角度来看,贝伐珠单抗治疗 mCRC 的附加治疗均不具有成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c7f/8418847/271ebb4cee9e/APJCP-22-1921-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c7f/8418847/26d68b482011/APJCP-22-1921-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c7f/8418847/271ebb4cee9e/APJCP-22-1921-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c7f/8418847/26d68b482011/APJCP-22-1921-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c7f/8418847/271ebb4cee9e/APJCP-22-1921-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic Evaluation of Adding Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Patients in Indonesia.印度尼西亚转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者化疗中添加贝伐珠单抗的经济学评价。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):1921-1926. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.6.1921.
2
Cetuximab as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a model-based economic evaluation in Indonesia setting.西妥昔单抗作为转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)一线治疗药物:在印度尼西亚的基于模型的经济学评价。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Aug 8;23(1):731. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11253-y.
3
Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRI + cetuximab vs FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in Germany: data from the FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) study.FOLFIRI + 西妥昔单抗与 FOLFIRI + 贝伐珠单抗一线治疗德国野生型转移性结直肠癌的成本效果分析:FIRE-3(AIO KRK-0306)研究数据。
J Med Econ. 2020 May;23(5):448-455. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1709848. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line FOLFIRI Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.一线 FOLFIRI 联合西妥昔单抗或贝伐珠单抗治疗 RAS 野生型左半转移性结直肠癌的成本效果分析。
Cancer Control. 2020 Jan-Dec;27(1):1073274820902271. doi: 10.1177/1073274820902271.
5
Cost-effectiveness of Capecitabine + Irinotecan Versus Leucovorin + Fluorouracil + Irinotecan in the Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in China.卡培他滨+伊立替康对比亚叶酸+氟尿嘧啶+伊立替康二线治疗中国转移性结直肠癌的成本效果分析。
Clin Ther. 2020 Nov;42(11):2148-2158.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.帕尼单抗联合mFOLFOX6与贝伐单抗联合mFOLFOX6用于一线治疗野生型RAS转移性结直肠癌患者的成本效益分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Nov;50(16):2791-801. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.016. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
7
A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.在美国,帕尼单抗与贝伐单抗用于野生型RAS转移性结直肠癌患者一线治疗的试验内成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2018 Nov;21(11):1075-1083. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1510409. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
8
Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.贝伐珠单抗联合卡培他滨维持治疗转移性结直肠癌的成本效果分析
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):236-242. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5070.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.在西班牙背景下,帕尼单抗联合mFOLFOX6与贝伐单抗联合mFOLFOX6用于野生型RAS转移性结直肠癌患者一线治疗的PEAK试验的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2017 Jun;20(6):574-584. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1285780. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
10
First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.转移性结直肠癌一线及二线贝伐单抗联合化疗:一项基于美国的成本效益分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 1;33(10):1112-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.4904. Epub 2015 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Drug Targeting, Drug Delivery, and Nanotechnology Applications: Therapeutic Significance in Cancer Treatment.药物靶向、药物递送及纳米技术应用的进展:在癌症治疗中的治疗意义
Pharmaceutics. 2025 Jan 16;17(1):121. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17010121.
2
Health economic evaluations for Indonesia: a systematic review assessing evidence quality and adherence to the Indonesian Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Guideline.印度尼西亚的卫生经济评估:一项评估证据质量和对印度尼西亚卫生技术评估(HTA)指南遵循情况的系统评价
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Mar 31;13:100184. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100184. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Bevacizumab in Combination With Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200.贝伐珠单抗联合奥沙利铂、氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸(FOLFOX4)治疗既往治疗的转移性结直肠癌:东部合作肿瘤学组研究 E3200 的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul 20;41(21):3670-3675. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02761.
2
Metastatic patterns and survival outcomes in patients with stage IV colon cancer: A population-based analysis.IV 期结肠癌患者的转移模式和生存结果:一项基于人群的分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jan;9(1):361-373. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2673. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
How Least Developed to Lower-Middle Income Countries Use Health Technology Assessment: A Scoping Review.
最不发达国家和中下等收入国家如何使用卫生技术评估:范围综述。
Pathog Glob Health. 2023 Mar;117(2):104-119. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2022.2106108. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
4
Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Different Doses of Irinotecan Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Long-Term and Prospective Cohort Study.不同剂量伊立替康联合贝伐单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的有效性及成本效用分析:一项长期前瞻性队列研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 14;12:756078. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.756078. eCollection 2022.
5
Cost Effectiveness of Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Advanced and Metastatic Cervical Cancer in India-A Model-Based Economic Analysis.贝伐珠单抗联合化疗治疗印度晚期和转移性宫颈癌的成本效果分析:基于模型的经济学评价。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Mar;8:e2100355. doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00355.
Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
贝伐珠单抗联合卡培他滨维持治疗转移性结直肠癌的成本效果分析
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):236-242. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5070.
4
Impact of primary tumour location on efficacy of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.原发肿瘤部位对转移性结直肠癌贝伐珠单抗联合化疗疗效的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Dec;119(12):1451-1455. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0304-6. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of XELOX versus XELOX plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer in a public hospital school.XELOX 与 XELOX 联合贝伐珠单抗治疗公立医院转移性结直肠癌的成本效果分析。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Oct 17;17(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3679-5.
6
Bevacizumab Combined with Chemotherapy Improves Survival for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from Meta Analysis.贝伐单抗联合化疗可提高转移性结直肠癌患者的生存率:荟萃分析证据
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 31;11(8):e0161912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161912. eCollection 2016.
7
Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone in previously untreated advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与单纯化疗相比,贝伐单抗联合化疗用于既往未治疗的晚期或转移性结直肠癌的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2734-y.
8
Economic Evaluation of Bevacizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme.贝伐珠单抗治疗新诊断多形性胶质母细胞瘤的经济学评价。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 10;33(20):2296-302. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7245. Epub 2015 May 26.
9
Bevacizumab plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (AVEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.贝伐珠单抗联合卡培他滨对比卡培他滨单药治疗未经治疗的转移性结直肠癌老年患者(AVEX):一项开放标签、随机、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1077-1085. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70154-2. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
10
Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis from seven randomized controlled trials.贝伐单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌的疗效与安全性:来自七项随机对照试验的汇总分析
Oncologist. 2013;18(9):1004-12. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0107. Epub 2013 Jul 23.