Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, Texas.
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2021 Summer;30(2):93-95.
The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the difference in response time, accuracy of radiographic interpretation, and frequency of changes in clinical management necessary after inaccurate reads when comparing orthopaedic and radiology providers. Data including provider response time, accuracy of radiographic interpretation and the frequency of changes in clinical management necessary after imaging reads was collected over a continuous two-month period at a Level I Trauma center. A total of 188 orthopedic injuries involving imaging were included. Orthopedic providers responded 203.2 minutes sooner than radiology providers. Accuracy of radiographic interpretation of the orthopaedic and radiology providers was 100% and 91%, respectively. Frequency of changes in clinical management after inaccurate interpretation of imaging by the orthopaedic and radiology provider was 0% and 7.6%, respectively. Based on our study, orthopaedic providers are significantly faster, more accurate, and make fewer mistakes affecting patient care while interpreting images of orthopaedic injuries than our radiology colleagues. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(2):093-096, 2021).
本研究旨在比较骨科医生和放射科医生在不准确读片后反应时间、放射解读准确性和临床管理所需变更频率的差异。在一级创伤中心连续两个月内收集了包括提供者反应时间、放射解读准确性和影像学读片后临床管理所需变更频率在内的数据。共纳入 188 例涉及影像学的骨科损伤。骨科医生的反应时间比放射科医生早 203.2 分钟。骨科和放射科医生的放射解读准确性分别为 100%和 91%。骨科和放射科医生不准确解读影像学后,临床管理变更的频率分别为 0%和 7.6%。根据我们的研究,在解读骨科损伤的影像学时,骨科医生比放射科同事反应更快、更准确,且对患者护理的影响更小,犯的错误也更少。(《外科骨科进展杂志》30(2):093-096, 2021)。