• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FIGO 评分 5 或 6 型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤单药耐药的预测因素:一项多中心、回顾性、队列研究。

Predictors for single-agent resistance in FIGO score 5 or 6 gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.

机构信息

Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Postgraduate Programme in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Postgraduate Programme in Medical Sciences, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Young Leadership Physicians Programme, National Academy of Medicine, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Postgraduate Programme in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1188-1198. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00262-X. Epub 2021 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00262-X
PMID:34181884
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia who have an International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) risk score of 5 or 6 usually receive non-toxic single-agent chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. Previous studies suggest that only a third of patients have complete remission, with the remaining patients requiring toxic multiagent chemotherapy to attain remission. As stratification factors are unknown, some centres offer multiagent therapy upfront, resulting in overtreatment of many patients. We aimed to identify predictive factors for resistance to single-agent therapy to inform clinicians on which patients presenting with a FIGO score of 5 or 6 are likely to benefit from upfront multiagent chemotherapy.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study of patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia presenting with a FIGO score of 5 or 6, who received treatment at three gestational trophoblastic neoplasia reference centres in the UK, Brazil, and the USA between Jan 1, 1964, and Dec 31, 2018. All patients who had been followed up for at least 12 months after remission were included. Patients were excluded if they had received a non-standard single-agent treatment (eg, etoposide); had been given a previously established first-line multiagent chemotherapy regimen; or had incomplete data for our analyses. Patient data were retrieved from medical records. The primary outcome was the incidence of chemoresistance after first-line or second-line single-agent chemotherapy. Variables associated with chemoresistance to single-agent therapies were identified by logistic regression analysis. In patient subgroups defined by choriocarcinoma histology and metastatic disease status, we did bootstrap modelling to define thresholds of pretreatment human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations and identify groups of patients with a greater than 80% risk (ie, a positive predictive value [PPV] of 0·8) of resistance to single-agent chemotherapy.

FINDINGS

Of 5025 patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, we identified 431 patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia presenting with a FIGO risk score of 5 or 6. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. 141 (40%) of 351 patients developed resistance to single-agent treatments and required multiagent chemotherapy to achieve remission. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression revealed metastatic disease status (multivariable logistic regression analysis, odds ratio [OR] 1·9 [95% CI 1·1-3·2], p=0·018), choriocarcinoma histology (3·7 [1·9-7·4], p=0·0002), and pretreatment human chorionic gonadotropin concentration (2·8 [1·9-4·1], p<0·0001) as significant predictors of resistance to single-agent therapies. In patients with no metastatic disease and without choriocarcinoma, a pretreatment human chorionic gonadotropin concentration of 411 000 IU/L or higher yielded a PPV of 0·8, whereas in patients with either metastases or choriocarcinoma, a pretreatment human chorionic gonadotropin concentration of 149 000 IU/L or higher yielded the same PPV for resistance to single-agent therapy.

INTERPRETATION

Approximately 60% of women with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia presenting with a FIGO risk score of 5 or 6 achieve remission with single-agent therapy; almost all remaining patients have complete remission with subsequent multiagent chemotherapy. Primary multiagent chemotherapy should only be given to patients with metastatic disease and choriocarcinoma, regardless of pretreatment human chorionic gonadotropin concentration, or to those defined by our new predictors.

FUNDING

None.

TRANSLATION

For the Portuguese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

摘要

背景

国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)风险评分 5 或 6 的妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者通常接受非毒性单药化疗作为一线治疗。先前的研究表明,只有三分之一的患者完全缓解,其余患者需要毒性更大的联合化疗才能缓解。由于分层因素未知,一些中心提供了联合化疗,导致许多患者过度治疗。我们旨在确定对单药治疗耐药的预测因素,以便告知临床医生哪些具有 FIGO 评分 5 或 6 的患者可能从初始联合化疗中受益。

方法

我们对英国、巴西和美国的三个妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤参考中心在 1964 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间就诊的 FIGO 评分 5 或 6 的妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者进行了多中心、回顾性、队列研究。所有接受过至少 12 个月缓解后随访的患者均被纳入。如果患者接受了非标准的单药治疗(如依托泊苷)、已接受既定的一线联合化疗方案或我们的分析存在不完整的数据,则将其排除在外。患者数据从病历中检索。主要结局是一线或二线单药化疗后耐药的发生率。通过逻辑回归分析确定与单药治疗耐药相关的变量。在绒毛膜癌组织学和转移性疾病状态定义的患者亚组中,我们进行了自举建模,以确定人绒毛膜促性腺激素浓度的治疗前阈值,并确定具有大于 80%耐药风险(即阳性预测值 [PPV] 为 0.8)的患者组对单药化疗。

发现

在 5025 例低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者中,我们确定了 431 例具有 FIGO 风险评分 5 或 6 的妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者。所有患者的随访时间均至少为 2 年。351 例患者中有 141 例(40%)对单药治疗产生耐药,需要联合化疗才能缓解。单变量和多变量逻辑回归显示转移性疾病状态(多变量逻辑回归分析,优势比 [OR] 1.9 [95%CI 1.1-3.2],p=0.018)、绒毛膜癌组织学(3.7 [1.9-7.4],p=0.0002)和治疗前人绒毛膜促性腺激素浓度(2.8 [1.9-4.1],p<0.0001)是对单药治疗耐药的显著预测因素。在没有转移疾病且没有绒毛膜癌的患者中,治疗前人绒毛膜促性腺激素浓度为 411000 IU/L 或更高时,PPV 为 0.8,而在有转移或绒毛膜癌的患者中,治疗前人绒毛膜促性腺激素浓度为 149000 IU/L 或更高时,对单药治疗耐药的 PPV 也为 0.8。

解释

大约 60% 的 FIGO 风险评分 5 或 6 的妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者通过单药治疗可达到缓解;几乎所有其余患者均通过后续的联合化疗获得完全缓解。原发联合化疗应仅用于具有转移疾病和绒毛膜癌的患者,无论其治疗前人绒毛膜促性腺激素浓度如何,或用于我们新的预测因素定义的患者。

资助

无。

相似文献

1
Predictors for single-agent resistance in FIGO score 5 or 6 gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.FIGO 评分 5 或 6 型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤单药耐药的预测因素:一项多中心、回顾性、队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1188-1198. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00262-X. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
2
Can the FIGO 2000 scoring system for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia be simplified? A new retrospective analysis from a nationwide dataset.FIGO 2000 评分系统能否简化用于妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤?来自全国性数据集的一项新回顾性分析。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1856-1861. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx211.
3
Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia after human chorionic gonadotropin normalization in a retrospective cohort of 7761 patients in France.法国一项回顾性队列研究,纳入 7761 例患者,分析人绒毛膜促性腺激素正常后发生妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):401.e1-401.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
Is chemotherapy always necessary for patients with nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with histopathological diagnosis of choriocarcinoma?对于组织病理学诊断为绒癌的非转移性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者,是否都需要化疗?
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Feb;148(2):239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
5
Evaluation and simplification of risk factors in FIGO 2000 scoring system for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a 19-year retrospective analysis.FIGO 2000 评分系统中妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤危险因素的评估和简化:19 年回顾性分析。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2022 Mar 15;23(3):218-229. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2100895.
6
Mortality rate of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with a FIGO score of ≥13.FIGO 评分≥13 的妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的死亡率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):390.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.083. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
7
Postmolar choriocarcinoma: An independent risk factor for chemotherapy resistance in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.磨牙后绒癌:低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤化疗耐药的独立危险因素。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 May;141(2):276-280. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
8
Treatment of nonmetastatic and metastatic low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: factors associated with resistance to single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy.非转移性和转移性低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的治疗:对单药甲氨蝶呤化疗耐药的相关因素。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):572-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.039. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
9
Treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的治疗。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jul;74:67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
10
GestaTIonal TrophoblAstic NeoplasIa Ultrasound assessMent: TITANIUM study.妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤超声评估:钛研究
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Sep;29(7):1216-1220. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000434. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Pulmonary metastasis risk and overall survival score in choriocarcinoma: a novel nomogram-based risk assessment system.绒毛膜癌的肺转移风险及总生存评分:一种基于列线图的新型风险评估系统
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 31;14(8):4867-4881. doi: 10.21037/tcr-2025-206. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
2
Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2025 update.妊娠滋养细胞疾病的诊断与管理:2025年更新
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Sep;171 Suppl 1:78-86. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70275. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
3
Immunotherapy in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: advances and future directions.
妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的免疫治疗:进展与未来方向
Front Immunol. 2025 Apr 11;16:1544585. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1544585. eCollection 2025.
4
Characterization changes and research waste in randomized controlled trials of global gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatus hernia over the past 20 years.过去20年全球胃食管反流病和食管裂孔疝随机对照试验中的特征变化与研究浪费
Int J Surg. 2025 Mar 1;111(3):2358-2375. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002227.
5
Predicting monotherapy resistance risk in patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: integration of the systemic immune-inflammation index and the prognostic nutritional index.预测低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者单药治疗耐药风险:全身免疫炎症指数与预后营养指数的整合
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 1;14:1368543. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1368543. eCollection 2024.
6
Risk factors for methotrexate resistance in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients (FIGO score 0-4).低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者(FIGO评分0 - 4)中对甲氨蝶呤耐药的危险因素。
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):1353-1362. doi: 10.62347/ZUCG8140. eCollection 2024.
7
Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia-A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Treated at a Tertiary Care Oncology Center in North India.妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤——印度北部一家三级肿瘤护理中心治疗患者的回顾性分析
South Asian J Cancer. 2023 Mar 2;12(2):153-158. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758356. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
Efficacy and Safety of the Surgery-First Approach Compared to the Chemotherapy-First Approach for Treating Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.手术优先与化疗优先治疗低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Cureus. 2023 Sep 21;15(9):e45726. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45726. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
From National to International Collaboration in Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Hurdles and Possibilities.从国家到国际合作在妊娠滋养细胞疾病:障碍和可能性。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2024;89(3):254-258. doi: 10.1159/000534321. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
10
Immunotherapy for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A New Paradigm.妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的免疫治疗:一种新的范式。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2024;89(3):230-238. doi: 10.1159/000533972. Epub 2023 Sep 13.