• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的治疗。

Treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

机构信息

Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Weston Park Cancer Centre, Sheffield, S10 2SJ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jul;74:67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.006
PMID:33741258
Abstract

Low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), defined as FIGO/WHO score 0-6, is highly curable with an overall survival rate, which is approximately 100%. For most low-risk GTN patients, first-line single-agent chemotherapy with either methotrexate or actinomycin-D is recommended with overall complete human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) response rates of 60%-90% in mostly retrospective, non-randomised studies. The few randomised trials that exist are not appropriately powered or designed to define the optimal first-line treatment. Approximately 25%-30% of low-risk patients will develop resistance to initial single-agent chemotherapy with an increase in the FIGO score, a diagnosis of choriocarcinoma, higher pre-treatment hCG and the presence of metastatic disease being associated with an increase in the risk of resistance. The optimal treatment of patients scoring WHO 5 and 6 remains poorly defined given that approximately 70%-80% of these patients develop resistance to first-line single-agent chemotherapy, and there is an urgent need to refine the FIGO/WHO scoring system so that these patients can be identified for more intensive therapy from the outset. Despite this, almost all low-risk patients who experience treatment failure with first-line monotherapy will be cured with either sequential single-agent chemotherapy or multiagent chemotherapy with or without surgery. Given the associated increased short and longer-term toxicities associated with multi-agent chemotherapy, promising strategies to reduce the exposure of women to combination chemotherapy in low-risk disease have been investigated, including the use of carboplatin and immune check-point inhibitors. Further evaluation is required to define optimal patient selection, particularly with the use of immunotherapeutic agents given their significant increased costs and lack of longer-term safety data. Although there is a clear need to revise the FIGO/WHO (2000) scoring system, consistent international use of this is recommended to facilitate the comparison of data along with future focus in the development of international collaborative translational and clinical research, including randomised controlled trials.

摘要

低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)定义为 FIGO/WHO 评分 0-6,整体存活率约为 100%,具有高度可治愈性。对于大多数低危型 GTN 患者,推荐使用甲氨蝶呤或放线菌素-D 进行一线单药化疗,大多数回顾性、非随机研究中,总完全人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)反应率为 60%-90%。目前存在的少数随机试验没有足够的效力或设计来确定最佳的一线治疗方法。大约 25%-30%的低危患者会对初始单药化疗产生耐药性,FIGO 评分升高、绒毛膜癌的诊断、治疗前 hCG 升高以及转移性疾病的存在与耐药风险的增加相关。鉴于大约 70%-80%的这些患者对一线单药化疗产生耐药性,对于 WHO 5 和 6 评分的患者,最佳治疗方法仍未得到明确界定,因此迫切需要改进 FIGO/WHO 评分系统,以便从一开始就能为这些患者提供更强化的治疗。尽管如此,几乎所有在一线单药治疗中失败的低危患者,如果使用序贯单药化疗或联合化疗(有或没有手术)治疗,都将被治愈。鉴于联合化疗相关的短期和长期毒性增加,已经研究了一些有前途的策略来降低女性在低危疾病中接触联合化疗的风险,包括使用卡铂和免疫检查点抑制剂。需要进一步评估来确定最佳患者选择,特别是在使用免疫治疗药物时,因为这些药物的成本显著增加,且缺乏长期安全性数据。虽然确实需要修订 FIGO/WHO(2000)评分系统,但建议一致采用国际标准,以促进数据的比较,并为未来国际协作转化和临床研究(包括随机对照试验)的发展提供重点。

相似文献

1
Treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的治疗。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jul;74:67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
2
Predictors for single-agent resistance in FIGO score 5 or 6 gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.FIGO 评分 5 或 6 型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤单药耐药的预测因素:一项多中心、回顾性、队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1188-1198. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00262-X. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
3
Treatment of nonmetastatic and metastatic low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: factors associated with resistance to single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy.非转移性和转移性低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的治疗:对单药甲氨蝶呤化疗耐药的相关因素。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):572-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.039. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
4
Risk adapted single-agent dactinomycin or carboplatin for second-line treatment of methotrexate resistant low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.风险适应性单药放线菌素或卡铂用于甲氨蝶呤耐药低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的二线治疗
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Dec;143(3):565-570. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
5
Efficacy analysis of single-agent carboplatin AUC4 2-weekly as second-line therapy for methotrexate-resistant (MTX-R) low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).单药卡铂 AUC4 每 2 周方案作为甲氨蝶呤耐药(MTX-R)低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)二线治疗的疗效分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Aug;175:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.072. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
6
Actinomycin D for methotrexate-failed low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.放线菌素D用于甲氨蝶呤治疗失败的低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤。
J Reprod Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;57(7-8):283-7.
7
Low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and methotrexate resistance: predictors of response to treatment with actinomycin D and need for combination chemotherapy.低风险妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤与甲氨蝶呤耐药性:放线菌素D治疗反应及联合化疗需求的预测因素
J Reprod Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;55(7-8):279-84.
8
Can carboplatin or etoposide replace actinomycin-d for second-line treatment of methotrexate resistant low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia?卡铂或依托泊苷能否替代更生霉素用于治疗甲氨蝶呤耐药的低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的二线治疗?
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 May;153(2):277-285. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
9
The outcome of patients with low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia treated with single agent intramuscular methotrexate and oral folinic acid.低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者采用单药肌内注射甲氨蝶呤联合口服亚叶酸治疗的结局。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Oct;49(15):3184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
10
A 30-year experience in using oral methotrexate as initial treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia regardless of risk group.30年使用口服甲氨蝶呤作为妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤初始治疗方法的经验,无论其风险分组如何。
Acta Oncol. 2016;55(2):234-9. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1059486. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2025 update.妊娠滋养细胞疾病的诊断与管理:2025年更新
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Sep;171 Suppl 1:78-86. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70275. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
2
Outcomes in gestational and non-gestational choriocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study with nomograms and web tools.妊娠性和非妊娠性绒毛膜癌的结局:一项使用列线图和网络工具的回顾性队列研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251344386. doi: 10.1177/17455057251344386. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
3
Assessment of risk factors associated with post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a retrospective cohort.
评估与葡萄胎后妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤相关的危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Oct 23;46. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo83. eCollection 2024.
4
Predicting monotherapy resistance risk in patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: integration of the systemic immune-inflammation index and the prognostic nutritional index.预测低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者单药治疗耐药风险:全身免疫炎症指数与预后营养指数的整合
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 1;14:1368543. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1368543. eCollection 2024.
5
Hypermethylated RASAL1's promotive role in chemoresistance and tumorigenesis of choriocarcinoma was regulated by TET2 but not DNMTs.甲基化 RASAL1 通过 TET2 而非 DNMTs 调控绒癌的化疗耐药和致瘤作用。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):977. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12758-w.
6
Case report: Multidrug resistant gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: focus on failure of immunotherapy and success of high-dose chemotherapy.病例报告:多药耐药性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤:聚焦免疫治疗失败与大剂量化疗成功
Front Oncol. 2024 May 13;14:1391408. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1391408. eCollection 2024.
7
Review of current literature on gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的文献综述。
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2023 Nov 27;35(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s43046-023-00195-y.
8
Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia-A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Treated at a Tertiary Care Oncology Center in North India.妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤——印度北部一家三级肿瘤护理中心治疗患者的回顾性分析
South Asian J Cancer. 2023 Mar 2;12(2):153-158. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758356. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
Fertility-Sparing Treatment in Gestational Choriocarcinoma: Evaluating Oncological and Obstetrical Outcomes in Young Patients.妊娠绒癌保留生育功能治疗:评估年轻患者的肿瘤学和产科结局。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Nov 14;29:e942078. doi: 10.12659/MSM.942078.
10
Outcomes of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Management: A Single Centre Review.妊娠滋养细胞疾病管理的结局:单中心回顾。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 8;59(9):1632. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091632.