Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(5):351-358. doi: 10.1159/000516989. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
Chronic loneliness has been linked to many adverse outcomes, including mental health problems. Psychological treatment of loneliness can be effective, but the evidence base is limited.
To investigate the efficacy of 2 internet-based interventions based on cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) and interpersonal psychotherapy (IIPT) relative to a wait-list control group and each other.
A total of 170 participants were recruited and randomized to either 9 weeks of ICBT (n = 68), IIPT (n = 68), or a wait-list condition (n = 34). The primary outcome was loneliness, measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale before, during, and after treatment. Secondary measures of psychiatric disorders and quality of life were administered before and after treatment. Follow-up was conducted 4 months after the treatment had ended. Primary outcome data were analyzed using growth curve modeling. Secondary outcomes were analyzed using robust regression models. The trial was preregistered (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03807154).
The ICBT condition had a significantly greater impact on loneliness compared to the wait-list and IIPT conditions. Effect sizes were moderate to large (Cohen d = 0.71) compared to the wait-list and moderate (d = 0.53) compared to IIPT. The IIPT condition did not differ significantly from the wait-list. Both active treatments led to significant increases in quality of life. Only the ICBT group had significantly lower symptoms of depression and generalized anxiety compared to the wait-list group. Treatment gains were maintained but not improved at follow-up.
ICBT can be an efficacious option for alleviating loneliness. The IIPT intervention was not as effective.
慢性孤独与许多不良后果有关,包括心理健康问题。孤独的心理治疗可能是有效的,但证据基础有限。
研究两种基于认知行为疗法(ICBT)和人际心理治疗(IIPT)的互联网干预措施相对于等待名单对照组和彼此的疗效。
共招募了 170 名参与者,并随机分为 9 周的 ICBT(n=68)、IIPT(n=68)或等待名单组(n=34)。主要结局是孤独感,使用 UCLA 孤独量表在治疗前、治疗中和治疗后进行测量。治疗前后还进行了精神障碍和生活质量的次要测量。治疗结束后 4 个月进行随访。使用增长曲线模型分析主要结局数据。使用稳健回归模型分析次要结局。该试验已预先注册(ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT03807154)。
与等待名单和 IIPT 条件相比,ICBT 条件对孤独感的影响显著更大。与等待名单相比,效果大小为中到大(Cohen d=0.71),与 IIPT 相比,效果大小为中(d=0.53)。IPT 条件与等待名单没有显著差异。两种积极的治疗方法都显著提高了生活质量。只有 ICBT 组与等待名单组相比,抑郁和广泛性焦虑症状显著降低。在随访时,治疗效果得到维持但没有进一步改善。
ICBT 可以是缓解孤独的有效选择。IPT 干预措施效果不佳。