Flynt Sierra, Cho Grace Y, Koscinski Brandon, Accorso Catherine, Knapp Ashley, Gorka Stephanie, Suhr Julie, Austin Megan, Allan Nicholas P
Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0303131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303131. eCollection 2025.
The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on mental health, straining an already overburdened healthcare system and highlighting health inequity issues. To streamline treatment efforts, targeting transdiagnostic risk factors for symptoms of emotional distress through a modular, transdiagnostic approach via telehealth may help to expand access to mental health treatment. Three transdiagnostic risk factors for emotional distress disorders that emerged as important treatment targets during the pandemic are anxiety sensitivity (AS) (i.e., fear of anxious arousal), intolerance of uncertainty (IU) (i.e., distress when confronted with uncertainty), and loneliness. To target AS, IU, and loneliness, we completed a pilot feasibility, acceptability, and utility trial of Coping Crew, our group, telehealth-delivered transdiagnostic treatment protocol. The 17 participants (Mage = 22.00, SD = 4.46; 71% female) rated the intervention and study protocol as feasible to deliver and acceptable and useful to address intervention targets. Evidence was mixed regarding feasibility, acceptability, and usefulness of the mobile app: 94% of the participants (n = 16) completed at least one daily survey 80% of the time, but only 35% of the participants (n = 6) completed at least 80% of the mobile app surveys over the course of the intervention. Most participants rated use of the app as acceptable and relevant to psychological improvements made due to the intervention. Exploratory analyses suggest potential reductions in transdiagnostic risk factors at post-intervention, which were maintained at 1- and 3-month follow-up. Detailed effect size estimates are provided. However, these should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size and exploratory nature of the study.
新冠疫情对心理健康产生了重大影响,使本就不堪重负的医疗系统更加紧张,并凸显了健康不平等问题。为了简化治疗工作,通过远程医疗采用模块化、跨诊断方法针对情绪困扰症状的跨诊断风险因素,可能有助于扩大心理健康治疗的可及性。在疫情期间成为重要治疗靶点的情绪困扰障碍的三个跨诊断风险因素是焦虑敏感性(AS)(即对焦虑唤醒的恐惧)、不确定性不耐受(IU)(即面对不确定性时的困扰)和孤独感。为了针对AS、IU和孤独感,我们完成了一项关于“应对小组”的试点可行性、可接受性和效用试验,这是我们团队通过远程医疗提供的跨诊断治疗方案。17名参与者(年龄中位数=22.00,标准差=4.46;71%为女性)对干预措施和研究方案的评价是,实施可行,对实现干预目标可接受且有用。关于移动应用程序的可行性、可接受性和有用性,证据不一:94%的参与者(n=16)在80%的时间里至少完成了一次每日调查,但在干预过程中,只有35%的参与者(n=6)完成了至少80%的移动应用程序调查。大多数参与者认为使用该应用程序是可接受的,并且与因干预而产生的心理改善相关。探索性分析表明,干预后跨诊断风险因素可能有所降低,并在1个月和3个月的随访中得以维持。提供了详细的效应量估计值。然而,由于样本量小且研究具有探索性,这些结果应谨慎解读。