• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道超声检查可准确确定直肠乙状结肠深部子宫内膜异位症的浸润范围。

Transvaginal sonography determines accurately extent of infiltration of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis.

作者信息

Aas-Eng M K, Lieng M, Dauser B, Diep L M, Leonardi M, Condous G, Hudelist G

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Gynecology, Certified Center for Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain, Hospital St John of God, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec;58(6):933-939. doi: 10.1002/uog.23728.

DOI:10.1002/uog.23728
PMID:34182605
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the agreement of measurements of the three diameters of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis (DE) lesions between presurgical evaluation using transvaginal sonography (TVS) and postsurgical specimen measurement (PSM).

METHODS

This was a prospective observational multicenter study including symptomatic women undergoing surgical treatment for DE involving the rectosigmoid, by either discoid or segmental resection, from April 2017 to December 2019. TVS was performed presurgically to evaluate lesion size (craniocaudal-midsagittal length, anteroposterior thickness and transverse diameter), in accordance with the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group consensus statement, and was compared with PSM. The agreement of lesion dimensions between the two methods was assessed by Bland-Altman plots and limits of agreement and additionally by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's correlation coefficient. Systematic and proportional bias was assessed using the paired t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 207 consecutive women were eligible for inclusion. Forty-one women were excluded, leaving 166 women for final analysis. A total of 123 segmental resections and 46 discoid resections were performed (both procedures were performed in three women). The mean difference between TVS and PSM was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.95) mm for lesion length measurements, 1.03 (95% CI, 0.98-1.09) mm for lesion thickness measurements and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89) mm for transverse diameter measurements. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between the two methods for measurements of lesion length. Furthermore, there was good reliability and correlation between TVS and PSM for lesion length measurements, as demonstrated by an ICC of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75-0.87) and Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.62-0.80), moderate-to-good reliability and correlation for lesion thickness measurements, with an ICC of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.67-0.82) and Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.51-0.70), and poor-to-moderate reliability and correlation for transverse diameter measurements, with an ICC of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.39-0.71) and Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.33-0.58).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative TVS determines accurately rectosigmoid DE lesion length. TVS can thereby contribute to optimal planning of surgical treatment options in women with rectosigmoid DE. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

摘要

目的

探讨经阴道超声(TVS)术前评估与术后标本测量(PSM)对直肠乙状结肠深部子宫内膜异位症(DE)病变三个直径测量值的一致性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性观察性多中心研究,纳入了2017年4月至2019年12月期间因直肠乙状结肠DE接受手术治疗的有症状女性,手术方式为盘状或节段性切除。术前根据国际深部子宫内膜异位症分析(IDEA)小组共识声明,采用TVS评估病变大小(头端尾端 - 正中矢状长度、前后厚度和横径),并与PSM进行比较。通过Bland - Altman图和一致性界限评估两种方法之间病变尺寸的一致性,此外还通过组内相关系数(ICC)和Pearson相关系数进行评估。使用配对t检验评估系统偏差和比例偏差。

结果

共有207名连续女性符合纳入标准。41名女性被排除,最终纳入166名女性进行分析。共进行了123例节段性切除和46例盘状切除(3名女性同时接受了这两种手术)。TVS与PSM之间的平均差值为:病变长度测量值为0.90(95%CI,0.85 - 0.95)mm,病变厚度测量值为1.03(95%CI,0.98 - 1.09)mm,横径测量值为0.84(95%CI,0.79 - 0.89)mm。Bland - Altman分析表明,两种方法在病变长度测量方面具有良好的一致性。此外,TVS与PSM在病变长度测量方面具有良好的可靠性和相关性,ICC为0.82(95%CI,0.75 - 0.87),Pearson相关系数为0.72(95%CI,0.62 - 0.80);在病变厚度测量方面具有中度至良好的可靠性和相关性,ICC为0.76(95%CI,0.67 - 0.82),Pearson相关系数为0.61(95%CI,0.51 - 0.70);在横径测量方面具有较差至中度的可靠性和相关性,ICC为0.58(95%CI,0.39 - 0.71),Pearson相关系数为0.46(95%CI,0.33 - 0.58)。

结论

术前TVS能准确测定直肠乙状结肠DE病变长度。因此,TVS有助于为直肠乙状结肠DE女性患者优化手术治疗方案的规划。© 2021作者。《超声医学与妇产科》由John Wiley & Sons Ltd代表国际妇产科超声学会出版。

相似文献

1
Transvaginal sonography determines accurately extent of infiltration of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis.经阴道超声检查可准确确定直肠乙状结肠深部子宫内膜异位症的浸润范围。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec;58(6):933-939. doi: 10.1002/uog.23728.
2
Transvaginal sonography accurately measures lesion-to-anal-verge distance in women with deep endometriosis of the rectosigmoid.经阴道超声检查可准确测量直肠乙状结肠深部子宫内膜异位症患者的病变至肛缘距离。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;56(5):766-772. doi: 10.1002/uog.21995.
3
Lesion-to-anal-verge distance in rectosigmoid endometriosis on transvaginal sonography vs magnetic resonance imaging: prospective study.经阴道超声与磁共振成像诊断直肠-乙状结肠交界子宫内膜异位症病灶-肛提肌距离的前瞻性研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Feb;61(2):243-250. doi: 10.1002/uog.26083.
4
Transvaginal sonography with vs without bowel preparation in diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: prospective study.经阴道超声检查加或不加肠道准备对直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症的诊断价值:前瞻性研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;53(3):402-409. doi: 10.1002/uog.19194. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
5
To determine the optimal ultrasonographic screening method for rectal/rectosigmoid deep endometriosis: Ultrasound "sliding sign," transvaginal ultrasound direct visualization or both?为确定直肠/乙状结肠深部子宫内膜异位症的最佳超声筛查方法:超声“滑动征”、经阴道超声直接可视化还是两者都有?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Nov;97(11):1287-1292. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13425. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
6
Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis in the rectosigmoid: systematic review and meta-analysis.经阴道超声诊断直肠-乙状结肠深部子宫内膜异位症的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;47(3):281-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.15662. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
7
Optimal imaging modality for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.直肠乙状结肠深部子宫内膜异位症检测的最佳影像学方式:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;58(2):190-200. doi: 10.1002/uog.23148. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
8
Does Bowel Preparation Improve the Performance of Rectal Water Contrast Transvaginal Ultrasonography in Diagnosing Rectosigmoid Endometriosis?肠道准备是否能提高经阴道直肠水对比超声检查诊断直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症的效能?
J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Apr;38(4):1017-1025. doi: 10.1002/jum.14790. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
9
Bowel preparation prior to transvaginal ultrasound improves detection of rectosigmoid deep infiltrating endometriosis and is well tolerated: prospective study of women with suspected endometriosis without surgical criteria.经阴道超声检查前肠道准备可提高直肠乙状结肠深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症的检出率,并具有良好的耐受性:无手术标准的疑似子宫内膜异位症女性的前瞻性研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb;57(2):335-341. doi: 10.1002/uog.22058.
10
Intra- and interobserver variability in nodule size of rectosigmoid endometriosis measured by two- and three-dimensional transvaginal sonography.经阴道二维和三维超声测量直肠-乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症结节大小的观察者内和观察者间变异性。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Jun;97(6):734-743. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13343. Epub 2018 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraoperative transvaginal ultrasound: a novel approach to refine surgical strategy in rectosigmoid endometriosis surgery.术中经阴道超声检查:一种优化乙状结肠直肠部子宫内膜异位症手术策略的新方法。
J Ultrasound. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s40477-025-01061-4.
2
Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of transvaginal ultrasound for the detection and measurement of endometriotic lesions of the bowel.经阴道超声检测和测量肠道子宫内膜异位症病变的观察者内和观察者间的可重复性。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Oct;102(10):1306-1315. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14660. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
3
Advances in Imaging for Assessing Pelvic Endometriosis.
评估盆腔子宫内膜异位症的影像学进展
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 26;12(12):2960. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122960.
4
Lesion-to-anal-verge distance in rectosigmoid endometriosis on transvaginal sonography vs magnetic resonance imaging: prospective study.经阴道超声与磁共振成像诊断直肠-乙状结肠交界子宫内膜异位症病灶-肛提肌距离的前瞻性研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Feb;61(2):243-250. doi: 10.1002/uog.26083.