• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of a pharmacist-led educational intervention on clinical outcomes: a randomised controlled study in patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia.药师主导的教育干预对临床结局的影响:一项在高血压、2 型糖尿病和高胆固醇血症患者中进行的随机对照研究。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e197-e202. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-002787. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
2
Pharmacists as clinical care partners: How a pharmacist-led intervention is associated with improved medication adherence in older adults with common chronic conditions.药剂师作为临床护理伙伴:一项由药剂师主导的干预措施如何与改善常见慢性病老年患者的药物依从性相关联。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Apr;30(4):345-351. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.4.345.
3
Pharmacist intervention program to enhance hypertension control: a randomised controlled trial.药师干预方案对高血压控制的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011 Feb;33(1):132-40. doi: 10.1007/s11096-010-9474-x. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
4
Impact of hospital pharmacist-delivered individualised pharmaceutical service intervention on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with hypertension: a randomised controlled trial.医院药师提供个体化药学服务干预对高血压患者临床和患者报告结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Nov;30(6):316-321. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002512. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
5
Impact of pharmacist-led medication management in care transitions.药师主导的药物管理在护理转接中的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2684-3.
6
The Medicines Advice Service Evaluation (MASE): a randomised controlled trial of a pharmacist-led telephone based intervention designed to improve medication adherence.药品咨询服务评估(MASE):一项随机对照试验,该试验针对一种由药剂师主导的基于电话的干预措施,旨在提高药物依从性。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Oct;25(10):759-69. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004670. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medication Reviews Conducted by Pharmacists on Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Factors in Ambulatory Care.系统评价和荟萃分析:药师在门诊护理中对心血管疾病风险因素进行药物评估。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 19;8(22):e013627. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013627. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
8
Impact of pharmacist-involved collaborative care on the clinical, humanistic and cost outcomes of high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes (IMPACT): a randomized controlled trial.药师参与的协作式照护对2型糖尿病高危患者临床、人文及成本结局的影响(IMPACT):一项随机对照试验
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017 Aug;42(4):475-482. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12536. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
9
Description of pharmacist interventions during physician-pharmacist co-management of hypertension.高血压医生-药师联合管理期间药师干预措施的描述
Pharm World Sci. 2008 Jan;30(1):128-35. doi: 10.1007/s11096-007-9155-6. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
10
Management of pharmacotherapy-related problems in acute coronary syndrome: Role of clinical pharmacist in cardiac rehabilitation unit.急性冠状动脉综合征中药物治疗相关问题的管理:心脏康复病房临床药师的作用。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 Jul;125(1):44-53. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13210. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice Guidelines for the Value Evaluation of Clinical Pharmacy Services (version 2).《临床药学服务价值评估实践指南(第2版)》
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 14;12:1472355. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1472355. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of pharmacist-led telemedicine medication management for hypertension established patients during COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot study.新冠疫情期间,高血压患者的药剂师主导的远程医疗药物管理评估:一项试点研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 16;10:1091484. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1091484. eCollection 2022.
3
Effectiveness of Community Pharmacy Diabetes and Hypertension Care Program: An Unexplored Opportunity for Community Pharmacists in Pakistan.社区药房糖尿病与高血压护理项目的成效:巴基斯坦社区药剂师未被发掘的机遇
Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 17;13:710617. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.710617. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Current evidence on the impact of medication optimization or pharmacological interventions on frailty or aspects of frailty: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.目前关于药物优化或药物干预对虚弱或虚弱方面影响的证据:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jan;77(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02951-8. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
2
Impact of pharmacist interventions on medication errors in hospitalized pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.药师干预对住院儿科患者用药错误的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Aug;42(4):979-994. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01034-z. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
3
Impact of the pharmacist-led intervention on the control of medical cardiovascular risk factors for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in general practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.药剂师主导的干预措施对全科医疗中心血管疾病一级预防的医学心血管危险因素控制的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jan;86(1):29-38. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14164. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
4
The impact of an emergency medicine clinical pharmacist on nursing satisfaction.临床药师对急诊护理满意度的影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Dec;41(6):1618-1624. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00927-y. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
5
Clinical pharmacist intervention reduces mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a propensity score matched analysis.临床药师干预可降低急性心肌梗死患者的死亡率:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Sep;26(5):248-252. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001344. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
6
2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk.2019年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会血脂异常管理指南:通过血脂修饰降低心血管风险
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):111-188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455.
7
Medication adherence interventions and outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews.药物依从性干预措施与结果:系统评价综述
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Jul;26(4):187-192. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001725. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
Effects of non-dispensing pharmacists integrated in general practice on medication-related hospitalisations.非配药药师整合到一般实践中对与药物相关的住院治疗的影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;85(10):2321-2331. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14041. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
9
Opportunities for collaboration between pharmacists and clinical pharmacologists to support medicines optimisation in the UK.药剂师和临床药理学家在英国合作支持优化药物治疗的机会。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;85(8):1666-1669. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13966. Epub 2019 May 27.
10
The value of pharmacists in general practice: perspectives of general practitioners-an exploratory interview study.全科医疗中药剂师的价值:全科医生的观点——一项探索性访谈研究
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Apr;41(2):496-503. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00795-6. Epub 2019 Mar 12.

药师主导的教育干预对临床结局的影响:一项在高血压、2 型糖尿病和高胆固醇血症患者中进行的随机对照研究。

Effect of a pharmacist-led educational intervention on clinical outcomes: a randomised controlled study in patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia.

机构信息

Diagnosis and Therapeutic Center, Hypertension and Cardiovascular Prevention Unit, Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, Île-de-France, France

Université de Paris, Faculté de Pharmacie, Paris, Île-de-France, France.

出版信息

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e197-e202. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-002787. Epub 2021 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-002787
PMID:34183458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8640406/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, hospital pharmacists have gained more importance in the clinical support of patients. However, most of the studies evaluating the impact of clinical pharmacy have only studied patients' adherence or satisfaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the direct clinical outcomes of a pharmacist-led educational intervention in patients with chronic disease.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised, controlled, parallel, physician-blinded study in a day hospital and a consultation unit of a French teaching hospital over a 1-year period. Patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes or hypercholesterolaemia who did not reach their therapeutic goals despite drug therapy were eligible. Patients in the intervention group received an intervention from a hospital pharmacist who provided patient education on pathology and drug management. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reaching their therapeutic goals for blood pressure, glycated haemoglobin level or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level at the 3-month follow-up consultation.

RESULTS

From January to December 2015, 89 patients were included and 73 completed the study. In the intervention group, 61.7% (21/34) of the patients reached their therapeutic goals compared with 33.3% (13/39) in the control group (p=0.015). The intervention was significantly more effective in polypharmacy patients (60.0% (12/20) vs 16.7% (4/24); p=0.005), in those aged >60 years (57.9% (11/19) vs 26.1% (6/23); p=0.037) and in patients with a high education level (68.8% (11/16) vs 29.4% (5/17); p=0.024).

CONCLUSION

A single pharmacist-led educational intervention has a clinical impact, doubling the proportion of patients reaching their therapeutic goals at 3 months, especially in polypharmacy patients and those aged >60 years. This study confirms the value of clinical involvement of hospital pharmacists in patient care in a consultation unit and day hospital.

摘要

目的

近年来,医院药师在患者的临床支持中发挥了越来越重要的作用。然而,大多数评估临床药学影响的研究仅研究了患者的依从性或满意度。本研究旨在评估药剂师主导的教育干预对慢性病患者直接临床结局的影响。

方法

我们在法国一所教学医院的日间病房和咨询部门进行了一项为期 1 年的随机、对照、平行、医师盲法研究。纳入了药物治疗后仍未达到治疗目标的高血压、2 型糖尿病或高胆固醇血症患者。干预组患者接受了医院药师的干预,药师为患者提供了病理学和药物管理方面的教育。主要结局是在 3 个月随访时达到血压、糖化血红蛋白水平或低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平治疗目标的患者比例。

结果

2015 年 1 月至 12 月,共纳入 89 例患者,73 例完成了研究。在干预组中,34 例患者中有 61.7%(21/34)达到了治疗目标,而对照组中有 33.3%(13/39)(p=0.015)。该干预在多药治疗患者中(60.0%(12/20)比 16.7%(4/24);p=0.005)、年龄>60 岁的患者(57.9%(11/19)比 26.1%(6/23);p=0.037)和教育程度较高的患者(68.8%(11/16)比 29.4%(5/17);p=0.024)中更为有效。

结论

单次由药剂师主导的教育干预具有临床意义,可将 3 个月时达到治疗目标的患者比例提高一倍,尤其是在多药治疗患者和年龄>60 岁的患者中。本研究证实了医院药师在咨询部门和日间病房参与患者护理的价值。