• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validation of a Claims-based Algorithm to Identify Pregestational Diabetes Among Pregnant Women in the United States.基于索赔的算法在美国孕妇中识别孕前糖尿病的验证。
Epidemiology. 2021 Nov 1;32(6):855-859. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001397.
2
Validation of algorithms to identify adverse perinatal outcomes in the Medicaid Analytic Extract database.验证算法以识别 Medicaid 分析提取数据库中的不良围产期结局。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Apr;29(4):419-426. doi: 10.1002/pds.4967. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
3
Validity of Alternative Claims-based Algorithms for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes in Pregnancy.基于替代索赔的算法在1型、2型糖尿病及妊娠期糖尿病中的有效性
Can J Diabetes. 2023 Dec;47(8):643-648.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2023.07.003. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
4
Pregestational Diabetes Exposure In Utero: Validation of a Definition for Use in Administrative Data.胎儿期糖尿病暴露:用于行政数据的定义验证。
Can J Diabetes. 2022 Jun;46(4):388-391.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
5
Validation of algorithms to ascertain clinical conditions and medical procedures used during pregnancy.验证用于确定妊娠期间临床情况和医疗程序的算法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Nov;20(11):1168-76. doi: 10.1002/pds.2217. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
6
Development and validation of algorithms to identify newly diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes in pediatric population using electronic medical records and claims data.利用电子病历和理赔数据开发和验证用于识别儿科人群中新诊断的 1 型和 2 型糖尿病的算法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Feb;28(2):234-243. doi: 10.1002/pds.4728. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
A cohort study of trends in the prevalence of pregestational diabetes in pregnancy recorded in UK general practice between 1995 and 2012.一项关于1995年至2012年间英国全科医疗中记录的妊娠前糖尿病患病率趋势的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 25;6(1):e009494. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009494.
9
Development and validation of claims-based algorithms to identify pregnancy based on data from a university hospital in Japan.基于日本某大学医院数据的基于索赔的妊娠识别算法的开发和验证。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Sep;38(9):1651-1654. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2101817. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
10
Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.患有糖尿病的女性妊娠中的特定出生缺陷:1997-2011 年全国出生缺陷预防研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;222(2):176.e1-176.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.028. Epub 2019 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambulatory care utilization in the first 24 months' postpartum by rurality and pregnancy-related conditions: A prospective cohort study from Maine.按农村地区和妊娠相关情况划分的产后头24个月的门诊护理利用情况:缅因州的一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12912. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12912.
2
Perinatal Outcomes Associated With Metformin Use During Pregnancy in Women With Pregestational Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.妊娠合并孕前 2 型糖尿病患者孕期使用二甲双胍与围产结局的关系。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Sep 1;47(9):1688-1695. doi: 10.2337/dc23-2056.
3
Does reversible postpartum contraception reduce the risk of pregnancy condition recurrence? A longitudinal claims-based study from Maine.产后可逆避孕是否降低妊娠病症复发风险?来自缅因州的一项基于纵向索赔的研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2024 Aug;96:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.06.001. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
4
Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Other Second-Line Antidiabetics in Early Pregnancy.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂及其他二线抗糖尿病药物在孕早期的安全性
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Feb 1;184(2):144-152. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.6663.
5
Acute health care utilization in the first 24 months postpartum by rurality and pregnancy complications: A prospective cohort study.农村和妊娠并发症对产后 24 个月内急性医疗保健利用的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14247. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14247. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
6
Achieving comparability in glycemic control between antidiabetic treatment strategies in pregnancy when using real world data.在使用真实世界数据时,实现妊娠期间不同降糖治疗策略的血糖控制可比性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Dec;32(12):1350-1359. doi: 10.1002/pds.5665. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
7
Mental Health Within 24 Months After Delivery Among Women with Common Pregnancy Conditions.分娩后 24 个月内常见妊娠合并症妇女的心理健康。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Jul;32(7):787-800. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0367. Epub 2023 May 15.
8
Fertility rates in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Wisconsin Medicaid.威斯康星州医疗补助计划中智力和发育障碍女性的生育率。
Disabil Health J. 2022 Jul;15(3):101321. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2022.101321. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
9
The use of glucose-lowering medications for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus during pregnancy in the United States.美国妊娠期 2 型糖尿病患者使用降糖药物治疗的情况。
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2022 Mar;5(2):e00319. doi: 10.1002/edm2.319. Epub 2021 Dec 24.

基于索赔的算法在美国孕妇中识别孕前糖尿病的验证。

Validation of a Claims-based Algorithm to Identify Pregestational Diabetes Among Pregnant Women in the United States.

机构信息

From the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston.

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2021 Nov 1;32(6):855-859. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001397.

DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001397
PMID:34183529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8478806/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying pregestational diabetes in pregnant women using administrative claims databases is important for studies of the safety of antidiabetic treatment in pregnancy, but limited data are available on the validity of case-identifying algorithms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of an administrative claims-based algorithm to identify pregestational diabetes.

METHODS

Using a cohort of pregnant women nested within the Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) database, we developed an algorithm to identify pregestational type 1 and type 2 diabetes, distinct from gestational diabetes. Within a single large healthcare system in the Boston area, we identified women who delivered an infant between 2000 and 2010 and were covered by Medicaid, and linked their electronic health records to their Medicaid claims within MAX. Medical records were reviewed by two physicians blinded to the algorithm classification to confirm or rule out pregestational diabetes, with disagreements resolved by discussion. We calculated positive predictive values with 95% confidence intervals using the medical record as the reference standard.

RESULTS

We identified 49 pregnancies classified by the claims-based algorithm as pregestational diabetes that were linked to the electronic health records and had records available for review. The PPV for any pregestational diabetes was 92% [95% confidence interval (CI) 82%, 97%], type 2 diabetes 87% (68%, 95%), and type 1 diabetes 57% (37%, 75%).

CONCLUSIONS

The claims-based algorithm for pregestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes performed well; however, the PPV was low for type 1 diabetes.

摘要

背景

利用行政索赔数据库识别孕妇的孕前糖尿病对于研究妊娠期间抗糖尿病治疗的安全性非常重要,但关于病例识别算法的有效性的数据有限。本研究的目的是评估基于行政索赔的算法识别孕前糖尿病的有效性。

方法

我们使用嵌套在 Medicaid Analytic Extract(MAX)数据库中的孕妇队列,开发了一种算法来识别与妊娠期糖尿病不同的孕前 1 型和 2 型糖尿病。在波士顿地区的单一大型医疗保健系统中,我们确定了在 2000 年至 2010 年间分娩并由 Medicaid 覆盖的妇女,并将其电子健康记录与其 MAX 中的 Medicaid 索赔联系起来。两名医生对病历进行了审查,他们对算法分类是盲的,以确认或排除孕前糖尿病,有分歧的通过讨论解决。我们使用病历作为参考标准,计算了阳性预测值及其 95%置信区间。

结果

我们确定了 49 例由索赔算法分类为孕前糖尿病的妊娠,这些妊娠与电子健康记录相关联,并且有记录可供审查。任何孕前糖尿病的阳性预测值为 92%(95%置信区间 82%,97%),2 型糖尿病为 87%(68%,95%),1 型糖尿病为 57%(37%,75%)。

结论

用于识别孕前糖尿病和 2 型糖尿病的基于索赔的算法表现良好;然而,1 型糖尿病的阳性预测值较低。