• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NCCN 高危和极高危前列腺癌比例与前列腺活检核心数量的变化。

Increasing rates of NCCN high and very high-risk prostate cancer versus number of prostate biopsy cores.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Prostate. 2021 Sep;81(12):874-881. doi: 10.1002/pros.24184. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1002/pros.24184
PMID:34184780
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, an increase in the rates of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) was reported. We tested whether the rates of and low, intermediate, high and very high-risk PCa changed over time. We also tested whether the number of prostate biopsy cores contributed to changes rates over time.

METHODS

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2015), annual rates of low, intermediate, high-risk according to traditional National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and high versus very high-risk PCa according to Johns Hopkins classification were tabulated without and with adjustment for the number of prostate biopsy cores.

RESULTS

In 119,574 eligible prostate cancer patients, the rates of NCCN low, intermediate, and high-risk PCa were, respectively, 29.7%, 47.8%, and 22.5%. Of high-risk patients, 39.6% and 60.4% fulfilled high and very high-risk criteria. Without adjustment for number of prostate biopsy cores, the estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) for low, intermediate, high and very high-risk were respectively -5.5% (32.4%-24.9%, p < .01), +0.5% (47.6%-48.4%, p = .09), +4.1% (8.2%-9.9%, p < .01), and +8.9% (11.8%-16.9%, p < .01), between 2010 and 2015. After adjustment for number of prostate biopsy cores, differences in rates over time disappeared and ranged from 29.8%-29.7% for low risk, 47.9%-47.9% for intermediate risk, 8.9%-9.0% for high-risk, and 13.6%-13.6% for very high-risk PCa (all p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of high and very high-risk PCa are strongly associated with the number of prostate biopsy cores, that in turn may be driven by broader use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

摘要

背景

最近,高危前列腺癌(PCa)的发病率有所上升。我们检测了 PCa 的低危、中危、高危和极高危的发病率是否随时间变化而变化。我们还检测了前列腺活检核心数量是否会影响发病率随时间的变化。

方法

在监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(2010-2015 年)中,根据传统的国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)和约翰霍普金斯分类,对低危、中危、高危和高危与极高危 PCa 的发病率进行了无和有前列腺活检核心数量调整的列表。

结果

在 119574 名合格的前列腺癌患者中,NCCN 低危、中危和高危 PCa 的发病率分别为 29.7%、47.8%和 22.5%。高危患者中,39.6%和 60.4%符合高危和极高危标准。未调整前列腺活检核心数量时,低危、中危、高危和极高危的估计年百分比变化(EAPC)分别为-5.5%(32.4%-24.9%,p<0.01)、+0.5%(47.6%-48.4%,p=0.09)、+4.1%(8.2%-9.9%,p<0.01)和+8.9%(11.8%-16.9%,p<0.01),2010 年至 2015 年期间。调整前列腺活检核心数量后,随时间变化的发病率差异消失,低危风险为 29.8%-29.7%,中危风险为 47.9%-47.9%,高危风险为 8.9%-9.0%,极高危风险为 13.6%-13.6%(均 p>0.05)。

结论

高危和极高危 PCa 的发病率与前列腺活检核心数量密切相关,而前列腺活检核心数量可能受更广泛使用磁共振成像(MRI)的驱动。

相似文献

1
Increasing rates of NCCN high and very high-risk prostate cancer versus number of prostate biopsy cores.NCCN 高危和极高危前列腺癌比例与前列腺活检核心数量的变化。
Prostate. 2021 Sep;81(12):874-881. doi: 10.1002/pros.24184. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
2
Assessment of the optimal number of positive biopsy cores to discriminate between cancer-specific mortality in high-risk versus very high-risk prostate cancer patients.评估最佳的阳性活检核心数量,以区分高危与极高危前列腺癌患者的癌症特异性死亡率。
Prostate. 2021 Oct;81(14):1055-1063. doi: 10.1002/pros.24202. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
3
Performance characteristics of prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy core details to predict oncological outcome in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.前列腺特异性抗原密度的性能特征及活检核心细节对接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的中高危前列腺癌患者肿瘤学结局的预测作用
BMC Urol. 2017 Jun 23;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0238-y.
4
National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?国家综合癌症网络®有利的中危前列腺癌——是否适合主动监测?
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1196-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.049. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
5
Improving the Stratification of Patients With Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.改善中危前列腺癌患者的分层。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021 Apr;19(2):e120-e128. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
6
Does the addition of targeted prostate biopsies to standard systemic biopsies influence treatment management for radiation oncologists?在标准系统活检基础上增加靶向前列腺活检是否会影响放射肿瘤学家的治疗管理?
BJU Int. 2016 Apr;117(4):584-91. doi: 10.1111/bju.13082. Epub 2015 May 4.
7
Identifying intermediate-risk candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer.识别前列腺癌主动监测的中危候选者。
Urol Oncol. 2017 Oct;35(10):605.e1-605.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.06.048. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
8
Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation active surveillance prostate cancer cohort: a characterisation of a prostate cancer active surveillance database.盖伊和圣托马斯国民保健系统基金会前列腺癌主动监测队列:前列腺癌主动监测数据库的特征。
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 19;21(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08255-z.
9
Twenty-year trends in prostate cancer stage and grade migration in a large contemporary german radical prostatectomy cohort.20 年来德国大型当代根治性前列腺切除术队列中前列腺癌分期和分级迁移的趋势。
Prostate. 2021 Sep;81(12):849-856. doi: 10.1002/pros.24181. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
10
Anterior apical cores in the initial prostate biopsy does not increase detection of significant prostate cancer.初次前列腺活检中的前尖部组织芯并不会增加显著前列腺癌的检出率。
Urol J. 2015 Apr 29;12(2):2084-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Neoadjuvant darolutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer: a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial.新辅助达洛鲁胺联合雄激素剥夺疗法治疗高危局部晚期前列腺癌:一项多中心、开放标签、单臂、II期试验
World J Urol. 2025 Jan 3;43(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05412-4.
2
The association of type and number of high-risk criteria with cancer-specific mortality in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者中,高风险标准的类型和数量与癌症特异性死亡率的关联。
Curr Urol. 2024 Jun;18(2):128-132. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000188. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
3
Refining Risk Stratification of High-risk and Locoregional Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials.
优化高危和局部区域前列腺癌的风险分层:随机试验的汇总分析
Eur Urol. 2025 Feb;87(2):217-224. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.038. Epub 2024 May 22.
4
The association of the type and number of D'Amico high-risk criteria with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined prostate cancer.达米科高危标准的类型和数量与病理上非器官局限性前列腺癌发生率的相关性。
Cent European J Urol. 2023;76(2):104-108. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.030. Epub 2023 Apr 30.
5
Putting patients first to redefine prostate cancer classifications.将患者放在首位以重新定义前列腺癌分类。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Nov 8;115(11):1249-1251. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad124.
6
External Tertiary-Care-Hospital Validation of the Epidemiological SEER-Based Nomogram Predicting Downgrading in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy.基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)的列线图对接受根治性前列腺切除术的高危前列腺癌患者降级情况预测的外部三级医疗中心验证
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 3;13(9):1614. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091614.
7
Contemporary seminal vesicle invasion rates in NCCN high-risk prostate cancer patients.当代 NCCN 高危前列腺癌患者的精囊侵犯率。
Prostate. 2022 Jun;82(10):1051-1059. doi: 10.1002/pros.24350. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
8
Influence of Biopsy Gleason Score on the Risk of Lymph Node Invasion in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.活检Gleason评分对接受根治性前列腺切除术的中危前列腺癌患者淋巴结侵犯风险的影响。
Front Surg. 2021 Dec 9;8:759070. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.759070. eCollection 2021.
9
Temporal trends, tumor characteristics and stage-specific survival in penile non-squamous cell carcinoma vs. squamous cell carcinoma.阴茎非鳞状细胞癌与鳞状细胞癌的时间趋势、肿瘤特征和分期特异性生存比较。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Jan;33(1):25-35. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01493-3. Epub 2021 Sep 2.