Akgül Sinem, Bonny Andrea E, Manos Brittny E, Jackson Kenneth, Holland-Hall Cynthia
Division of Adolescent Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
The Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Eat Disord. 2022 Nov-Dec;30(6):587-601. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2021.1939920. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
The study aimed to describe the progression of state anxiety in adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN) hospitalized on a high calorie refeeding (HCR) protocol. Participants, 12-21 years, admitted for malnutrition due to AN were placed on a HCR protocol in which calories were advanced by 300 kcal/day. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC) was given to participants within 24 hours of hospitalization and the state anxiety component of the STAIC was administered daily immediately before and after breakfast until discharge. Of 22 patients enrolled, 86% were female, mean age was 14.9 ± 2.0 years, and 95% had AN-restrictive type. The median state and trait anxiety scores at time of admission were 37.0 (28-55) and 35.5 (23-51), respectively. There was no significant difference in median pre-meal state anxiety from hospital day 1 to 6 (34.0(26-55) vs. 38.5(25-55), -value = 0.079) or in median post-meal state anxiety from hospital day 1 to 6 (35.5(29-56) vs. 37(24-56), -value = 0.484). Similarly, we found minimal correlation between change in caloric intake and change in pre-meal S-anxiety (Spearman correlation coefficient = -0.032) or post-meal S-anxiety (Spearman correlation = 0.032). While this was a small sample observing anxiety over one week, we found no evidence that state anxiety increased with advancing calories, providing additional support for the use of more rapid refeeding protocols.
该研究旨在描述因神经性厌食症(AN)住院并接受高热量再喂养(HCR)方案的青少年的状态焦虑进展情况。12至21岁因AN导致营养不良而入院的参与者接受了HCR方案,即每天增加300千卡热量。在住院24小时内对参与者进行儿童状态-特质焦虑量表(STAIC)测试,并在出院前每天早餐前后立即对STAIC的状态焦虑部分进行测试。在纳入的22名患者中,86%为女性,平均年龄为14.9±2.0岁,95%为AN限制型。入院时状态焦虑和特质焦虑得分的中位数分别为37.0(28 - 55)和35.5(23 - 51)。从住院第1天到第6天,餐前状态焦虑中位数无显著差异(34.0(26 - 55) 对 38.5(25 - 55),P值 = 0.079),餐后状态焦虑中位数也无显著差异(35.5(29 - 56) 对 37(24 - 56),P值 = 0.484)。同样,我们发现热量摄入变化与餐前状态焦虑变化(斯皮尔曼相关系数 = -0.032)或餐后状态焦虑变化(斯皮尔曼相关系数 = 0.032)之间的相关性极小。虽然这是一个观察一周焦虑情况的小样本研究,但我们没有发现状态焦虑随热量增加而增加的证据,这为使用更快速的再喂养方案提供了额外支持。