Gatica-Ortega María-Elena, Mowitz Martin, Pastor-Nieto María-Antonia, Navarro-Triviño Francisco J, Fernández-Redondo Virginia, Hernández-Cano Natalia, Borrego Leopoldo, Gómez-de-la-Fuente Enrique, Torralba Miguel, Svedman Cecilia, Giménez-Arnau Ana
Dermatology Department, University Hospital Complex of Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Contact Dermatitis. 2021 Nov;85(5):554-562. doi: 10.1111/cod.13924. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
Allergic contact dermatitis from glucose sensors may interfere with their ongoing application.
To evaluate a series of Spanish patients with contact dermatitis to glucose sensors regarding former sources of contact allergens, patch test results, and outcomes from the ongoing use of the device.
A series of patients with contact dermatitis from glucose sensors was investigated in eight dermatology departments across Spain (epidemiological features, brands, latency time to develop dermatitis, the ability to continue using the devices as well as the patch test results).
Thirty patients were evaluated (mean age 20.9 years). A total of 66.7% were children and 66.7% female. Ninety per cent used Freestyle Libre (FSL). Eight of 26 (30.8%) reacted to isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) and two of 20 (10.0%) to N,N dimethylacrylamide (DMAA). The mean latency time to develop dermatitis was 9 months. Sixteen of 29 (55.2%) patients continued using the same sensor causing the reaction. Thirteen of 29 (44.8%) patients were unable to continue using the sensor because of severe reactions. Of these, five were positive to IBOA, one to IBOA and DMAA, one to DMAA, one to colophony, and one to isopropyl alcohol wipes. In one patient, the outcome was unknown.
The frequency of sensitisation to IBOA and DMAA, was lower than in other European series, but similar to a previously published Spanish article. Legislation requiring manufacturers to provide information regarding the composition of medical devices and cooperate with the investigations into contact dermatitis is urgently needed.
葡萄糖传感器引起的过敏性接触性皮炎可能会干扰其持续应用。
评估一系列对葡萄糖传感器发生接触性皮炎的西班牙患者的既往接触过敏原来源、斑贴试验结果以及该设备持续使用的结局。
在西班牙的八个皮肤科科室对一系列因葡萄糖传感器发生接触性皮炎的患者进行了调查(包括流行病学特征、品牌、发生皮炎的潜伏时间、继续使用该设备的能力以及斑贴试验结果)。
共评估了30例患者(平均年龄20.9岁)。其中66.7%为儿童,66.7%为女性。90%使用的是Freestyle Libre(FSL)。26例中有8例(30.8%)对丙烯酸异冰片酯(IBOA)有反应,20例中有2例(10.0%)对N,N -二甲基丙烯酰胺(DMAA)有反应。发生皮炎的平均潜伏时间为9个月。29例患者中有16例(55.2%)继续使用引发反应的同一传感器。29例患者中有13例(44.8%)因严重反应而无法继续使用该传感器。其中,5例对IBOA呈阳性,1例对IBOA和DMAA呈阳性,1例对DMAA呈阳性,1例对松香呈阳性,1例对异丙醇擦拭巾呈阳性。1例患者的结局未知。
对IBOA和DMAA的致敏频率低于其他欧洲系列,但与之前发表的一篇西班牙文章相似。迫切需要立法要求制造商提供有关医疗器械成分的信息,并配合对接触性皮炎的调查。