Suppr超能文献

接触性皮炎由葡萄糖传感器引起-15 名成年患者经医疗器械贴片试验系列测试。

Contact dermatitis caused by glucose sensors-15 adult patients tested with a medical device patch test series.

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Department of Dermatology, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2020 Oct;83(4):301-309. doi: 10.1111/cod.13649. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several cases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to the glucose sensor FreeStyle Libre have been reported. Isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) and N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMAA) are known culprit allergens.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate patients with suspected ACD to FreeStyle Libre in a standardized manner, present causative allergens, and assess patient-reported implications.

METHODS

A total of 15 patients with suspected ACD to FreeStyle Libre were patch tested with the Swedish baseline series and a new medical device series. IBOA and DMAA were tested at 0.1% and 0.3% in petrolatum (pet.). Readings were performed on day (D) 3 and D7. Background data, details on skin reactions, and associated implications were assessed using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were sensitized to IBOA and four to DMAA. Two positive reactions to IBOA and one to DMAA were seen only at 0.3% concentration on D7. Median duration of sensor use before dermatitis onset was 6 months. Half the number of the patients took precautions in everyday life due to sensor-related skin reactions. Six patients discontinued sensor usage.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with suspected ACD to glucose sensors should be evaluated with a relevant patch test series containing IBOA and DMAA. Adding the 0.3% pet. concentration is recommended. The reading on D7 is necessary.

摘要

背景

已有几例对 FreeStyle Libre 葡萄糖传感器的过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)的报道。异冰片丙烯酸酯(IBOA)和 N,N-二甲基丙烯酰胺(DMAA)是已知的致敏过敏原。

目的

以标准化的方式评估疑似对 FreeStyle Libre 发生 ACD 的患者,介绍致病过敏原,并评估患者报告的影响。

方法

对 15 名疑似对 FreeStyle Libre 发生 ACD 的患者进行了斑贴试验,使用了瑞典基础系列和新的医疗器械系列。IBOA 和 DMAA 在凡士林(pet.)中以 0.1%和 0.3%的浓度进行测试。在第 3 天(D)和第 7 天(D7)进行读数。使用问卷评估背景数据、皮肤反应的详细信息和相关影响。

结果

13 名患者对 IBOA 敏感,4 名患者对 DMAA 敏感。仅在 D7 时,有 2 例对 IBOA 的阳性反应和 1 例对 DMAA 的阳性反应出现在 0.3%的浓度下。发生皮炎前传感器使用的中位时间为 6 个月。有一半的患者因与传感器相关的皮肤反应而在日常生活中采取了预防措施。有 6 名患者停止使用传感器。

结论

疑似对葡萄糖传感器发生 ACD 的患者应使用含有 IBOA 和 DMAA 的相关斑贴试验系列进行评估。建议增加 0.3%的 pet.浓度。需要在 D7 进行读数。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验