Heeyoung Lim, BSN, RN, College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung A. Kang, MSN, RN, AGACNP-BC, AGCNS-BC, School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York City, New York.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2021;48(4):325-331. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000776.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of combined pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFMEs) and a novel electrical stimulation (ES) device versus PFMEs alone on lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary incontinence-related quality of life, and pelvic floor muscle contractions (PFMCs).
Nonrandomized comparison cohort study.
The sample comprised 54 community-dwelling middle-aged women with stress urinary incontinence recruited from churches and cultural centers in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea. Comparisons of demographic and pertinent clinical characteristics revealed no significant differences between the experimental and comparison groups.
Participants allocated to the combined intervention group (n = 27) performed self-exercises of the pelvic floor muscles 3 times a day under weekly telephone coaching, and they used the ES device twice daily for 8 weeks. Participants in the comparison group (n = 27) received the PFMEs alone without telephone coaching. The 3 main outcomes including lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary incontinence-related quality of life, and PFMCs were measured using the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptom instrument (BFLUTS), King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and a perineometer, respectively. Study outcomes were measured at baseline and at the end of the 8-week period.
Participants in the experimental group achieved significantly greater reductions in lower urinary tract symptoms (t = -4.07, P < .001) and improvement in urinary incontinence-related quality of life (P = .006), peak PFMC pressure (P = .004), mean pelvic muscle contraction (PMC) pressure (P < .001), and duration of PFMCs (P < .001) when compared to participants undergoing PFMEs alone.
Combined ES and pelvic floor exercise was more effective in reducing severity of lower urinary tract symptoms, enhancing health-related quality of life, and increasing PMC pressure in middle-aged women with stress urinary incontinence than PFMEs alone.
本研究旨在评估联合盆底肌运动(PFMEs)和新型电刺激(ES)设备与单独进行 PFMEs 相比,对下尿路症状、与尿失禁相关的生活质量以及盆底肌收缩(PFMCs)的影响。
非随机比较队列研究。
该样本由 54 名居住在韩国京畿道的社区中年女性压力性尿失禁患者组成,从教堂和文化中心招募。实验组和对照组的人口统计学和相关临床特征比较无显著差异。
分配到联合干预组(n = 27)的参与者每天 3 次在每周电话指导下进行盆底肌肉自我锻炼,并使用 ES 设备每天 2 次进行 8 周。比较组(n = 27)仅接受 PFMEs,无电话指导。使用布里斯托女性下尿路症状量表(BFLUTS)、King's 健康问卷(KHQ)和会阴计分别测量下尿路症状、与尿失禁相关的生活质量和 PFMCs 这 3 个主要结局。研究结果在基线和 8 周结束时进行测量。
与单独进行 PFMEs 的患者相比,实验组在降低下尿路症状严重程度(t = -4.07,P <.001)和改善与尿失禁相关的生活质量(P =.006)、峰值 PFMC 压力(P =.004)、平均 PMC 压力(P <.001)和 PFMC 持续时间(P <.001)方面取得了显著更大的改善。
与单独进行 PFMEs 相比,联合 ES 和盆底肌锻炼在降低中年女性压力性尿失禁患者的下尿路症状严重程度、提高生活质量以及增加 PMC 压力方面更为有效。