Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助与手动全膝关节置换术:倾向评分匹配分析。

Robotic Arm-Assisted versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

School of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2023 Jan;36(1):105-114. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731323. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare (1) operative time, (2) in-hospital pain scores, (3) opioid medication use, (4) length of stay (LOS), (5) discharge disposition at 90-day postoperative, (6) range of motion (ROM), (7) number of physical therapy (PT) visits, (8) emergency department (ED) visits, (9) readmissions, (10) reoperations, (11) complications, and (12) 1-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in propensity matched patient cohorts who underwent robotic arm-assisted (RA) versus manual total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Using a prospectively collected institutional database, patients who underwent RA- and manual TKA were the nearest neighbor propensity score matched 3:1 (255 manual TKA:85 RA-TKA), accounting for various preoperative characteristics. Data were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson's Chi-squared, and Fisher's exact tests, when appropriate. Postoperative pain scores, opioid use, ED visits, readmissions, and 1-year PROMs were similar between the cohorts. Manual TKA patients achieved higher maximum flexion ROM (120.3 ± 9.9 versus 117.8 ± 10.2,  = 0.043) with no statistical differences in other ROM parameters. Manual TKA had shorter operative time (105 vs.113 minutes,  < 0.001), and fewer PT visits (median [interquartile range] = 10.0 [8.0-13.0] vs. 11.5 [9.5-15.5] visits,  = 0.014). RA-TKA had shorter LOS (0.48 ± 0.59 vs.1.2 ± 0.59 days,  < 0.001) and higher proportion of home discharges ( < 0.001). RA-TKA and manual TKA had similar postoperative complications and 1-year PROMs. Although RA-TKA patients had longer operative times, they had shorter LOS and higher propensity for home discharge. In an era of value-based care models and the steady shift to outpatient TKA, these trends need to be explored further. Long-term and randomized controlled studies may help determine potential added value of RA-TKA versus manual TKA. This study reflects level of evidence III.

摘要

本研究旨在比较(1)手术时间、(2)住院期间疼痛评分、(3)阿片类药物使用、(4)住院时间(LOS)、(5)术后 90 天的出院去向、(6)活动范围(ROM)、(7)物理治疗(PT)就诊次数、(8)急诊就诊次数、(9)再入院率、(10)再次手术率、(11)并发症发生率、(12)1 年患者报告结局(PROM)在接受机器人辅助(RA)和手动全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者中匹配队列的比较。使用前瞻性收集的机构数据库,RA 和手动 TKA 的患者采用最近邻倾向评分匹配 3:1(255 例手动 TKA:85 例 RA-TKA),考虑到各种术前特征。使用方差分析(ANOVA)、Kruskal-Wallis、Pearson Chi-squared 和 Fisher 精确检验进行数据比较,必要时进行。两组患者术后疼痛评分、阿片类药物使用、急诊就诊次数、再入院率和 1 年 PROM 相似。手动 TKA 患者的最大屈曲 ROM 更高(120.3±9.9 比 117.8±10.2,=0.043),但其他 ROM 参数无统计学差异。手动 TKA 的手术时间更短(105 比 113 分钟,<0.001),PT 就诊次数更少(中位数[四分位距]10.0[8.0-13.0]比 11.5[9.5-15.5]次,=0.014)。RA-TKA 的 LOS 更短(0.48±0.59 比 1.2±0.59 天,<0.001),家庭出院比例更高(<0.001)。RA-TKA 和手动 TKA 的术后并发症和 1 年 PROM 相似。虽然 RA-TKA 患者的手术时间较长,但他们的 LOS 更短,家庭出院的可能性更高。在基于价值的护理模式和向门诊 TKA 稳步转变的时代,需要进一步探讨这些趋势。长期和随机对照研究可能有助于确定 RA-TKA 与手动 TKA 的潜在附加价值。本研究反映了证据等级 III。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验