Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty is Safe in the Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting.

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has become more popular in the United States. With the significant trend towards performing TKA in outpatient and ambulatory surgery center (ASC) settings, this study was implemented to determine the safety and efficacy of RA-TKA in an ASC.

METHOD

A retrospective review identified 172 outpatient TKAs (86 RA-TKAs and 86 TKAs) performed between January 2020 and January 2021. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon at the same free-standing ASC. Patients were followed for at least 90 days after surgery; complications, reoperations, readmissions, operative time, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

In both groups, all patients were successfully discharged home from the ASC on the day of surgery. No differences were noted in overall complications, reoperations, hospital admissions, or delays in discharge. RA-TKA had slightly longer operative times (79 vs 75 min [p = 0.017]) and total length of stay at the ASC (468 vs 412 min [p < 0.0001]) than conventional TKA. No significant differences were noted in outcome scores at 2-, 6-, or 12-week follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that RA-TKA can be successfully implemented in an ASC, with similar outcomes compared with TKA using conventional instrumentation. Initial surgical times were increased secondary to the learning curve of implementing RA-TKA. Long-term follow-up is necessary to determine implant longevity and long-term outcomes.

METHOD

A retrospective review identified 172 outpatient TKAs (86 RA-TKAs and 86 TKAs) performed between January 2020 and January 2021. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon at the same free-standing ASC. Patients were followed for at least 90 days after surgery; complications, reoperations, readmissions, operative time, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

In both groups, all patients were successfully discharged home from the ASC on the day of surgery. No differences were noted in overall complications, reoperations, hospital admissions, or delays in discharge. RA-TKA had slightly longer operative times (79 vs 75 min [p = 0.017]) and total length of stay at the ASC (468 vs 412 min [p < 0.0001]) than conventional TKA. No significant differences were noted in outcome scores at 2-, 6-, or 12-week follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that RA-TKA can be successfully implemented in an ASC, with similar outcomes compared with TKA using conventional instrumentation. Initial surgical times were increased secondary to the learning curve of implementing RA-TKA. Long-term follow-up is necessary to determine implant longevity and long-term outcomes.