• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The effect of prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve in patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy.腹腔镜子宫切除术后预防性双侧输卵管切除术对卵巢储备功能的影响。
J Ovarian Res. 2021 Jun 29;14(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00825-w.
2
Comparing surgical outcome and ovarian reserve after laparoscopic hysterectomy between two methods of with and without prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy: A randomized controlled trial.比较腹腔镜子宫切除术中两种方法(预防性双侧输卵管切除术与非预防性双侧输卵管切除术)后的手术结局及卵巢储备功能:一项随机对照试验。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2018 Apr-Jun;14(3):543-548. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.193114.
3
[What haemostatic technique should we use for opportunistic salpingectomy during benign laparoscopic hysterectomy?].[在良性腹腔镜子宫切除术中进行机会性输卵管切除术时,我们应该使用哪种止血技术?]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017 Sep;45(9):453-459. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
4
Change in the ovarian environment after hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy: is it the technique or surgery itself?子宫切除加双侧输卵管切除术后卵巢环境的变化:是手术技术还是手术本身导致的?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Sep;204:57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.483. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
5
Comparing the effect of laparoscopic supracervical and total hysterectomy for uterine fibroids on ovarian reserve by assessing serum anti-mullerian hormone levels: a prospective cohort study.通过评估血清抗苗勒管激素水平比较腹腔镜次全子宫切除术和全子宫切除术治疗子宫肌瘤对卵巢储备功能的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 May-Jun;22(4):637-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.01.025. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
6
Short-Term Impact of Laparoscopic Cystectomy on Ovarian Reserve Tests in Bilateral and Unilateral Endometriotic and Nonendometriotic Cysts.腹腔镜囊肿切除术对双侧和单侧子宫内膜异位囊肿及非子宫内膜异位囊肿患者卵巢储备功能检测的短期影响
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):719-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
7
3 to 5 Years Later: Long-term Effects of Prophylactic Bilateral Salpingectomy on Ovarian Function.3至5年后:预防性双侧输卵管切除术对卵巢功能的长期影响。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.833. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
8
Wide excision of soft tissues adjacent to the ovary and fallopian tube does not impair the ovarian reserve in women undergoing prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy: results from a randomized, controlled trial.对于接受预防性双侧输卵管切除术的女性,广泛切除卵巢和输卵管附近的软组织不会损害卵巢储备功能:一项随机对照试验的结果
Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov;104(5):1332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
9
Comparison of the influence of three fibroid treatment options: supracervical hysterectomy, ulipristal acetate and uterine artery embolization on ovarian reserve - an observational study.比较三种子宫肌瘤治疗方案对卵巢储备功能的影响:子宫次全切除术、乌利司他和子宫动脉栓塞术 - 一项观察性研究。
J Ovarian Res. 2018 Jun 1;11(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13048-018-0420-1.
10
Impact of opportunistic salpingectomy on anti-Müllerian hormone in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜子宫切除术中机会性输卵管切除术对抗苗勒管激素的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2017 Jan;124(2):314-320. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14182. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Opportunistic Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve: A Systematic Review.机会性输卵管切除术对卵巢储备功能的影响:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 3;13(11):3296. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113296.
2
The Effect of Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve Using Two Different Electrosurgical Instruments: Ultrasonic Shears Versus Bipolar Electrocautery.使用两种不同电外科器械行输卵管切除术对卵巢储备功能的影响:超声刀与双极电凝器对比
Cureus. 2024 May 1;16(5):e59434. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59434. eCollection 2024 May.
3
A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Opportunistic Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve and Function.一项评估机会性输卵管切除术对卵巢储备和功能影响的研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Feb;73(1):62-68. doi: 10.1007/s13224-022-01709-9. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
4
Ovarian cancer prevention by opportunistic salpingectomy is a new de facto standard in Germany.在德国,通过机会性输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌已成为新的事实上的标准。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug;149(10):6953-6966. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04578-5. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
5
Effect of hysterectomy on ovarian function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫切除术对卵巢功能的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Ovarian Res. 2023 Feb 9;16(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13048-023-01117-1.
6
Possible Association of Hysterectomy Accompanied with Opportunistic Salpingectomy with Early Menopause: A Retrospective Cohort Study.子宫切除术伴随机输卵管切除术与早绝经的可能关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;19(19):11871. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911871.

本文引用的文献

1
Salpingectomy may decrease antral follicle count but not live birth rate for IVF-ET patients aged 35-39 years: a retrospective study.输卵管切除术可能会降低 35-39 岁 IVF-ET 患者的窦卵泡计数,但不会降低活产率:一项回顾性研究。
J Ovarian Res. 2020 Jul 20;13(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00678-9.
2
Ovarian reserve markers in women using various hormonal contraceptives.使用各种激素避孕药的女性的卵巢储备标志物
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020 Feb;25(1):65-71. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1702158. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
3
Association between ovarian reserve and preeclampsia: a cohort study.卵巢储备与子痫前期的关联:一项队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2578-y.
4
Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone.全子宫切除术加选择性输卵管切除术与单纯全子宫切除术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 28;8(8):CD012858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012858.pub2.
5
Ovarian Reserve Markers to Identify Poor Responders in the Context of Poseidon Classification.在波塞冬分类背景下用于识别低反应者的卵巢储备标志物
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 May 8;10:281. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00281. eCollection 2019.
6
Effects of hysterectomy with simultaneous bilateral salpingectomy on the subsequent pelvic mass.子宫切除术同时行双侧输卵管切除术对后续盆腔肿块的影响。
J Ovarian Res. 2019 Mar 27;12(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0504-6.
7
Epithelial ovarian cancer.上皮性卵巢癌。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 23;393(10177):1240-1253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32552-2.
8
High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Basic Sciences, Clinical and Therapeutic Standpoints.高级别浆液性卵巢癌:基础科学、临床和治疗观点。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 22;20(4):952. doi: 10.3390/ijms20040952.
9
Establishment and depletion of the ovarian reserve: physiology and impact of environmental chemicals.卵巢储备的建立和耗竭:生理学及环境化学物质的影响。
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019 May;76(9):1729-1746. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03028-1. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
Risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy as a two-staged alternative for primary prevention of ovarian cancer in women at increased risk: a commentary.降低风险的早期输卵管切除术和延迟卵巢切除术作为高危女性原发性卵巢癌一级预防的两阶段替代方案:一篇评论
BJOG. 2019 Jun;126(7):831-839. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15651. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

腹腔镜子宫切除术后预防性双侧输卵管切除术对卵巢储备功能的影响。

The effect of prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve in patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, 36 San Hao Street, Heping District, Liaoning, 110004, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

J Ovarian Res. 2021 Jun 29;14(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00825-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13048-021-00825-w
PMID:34187523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8243536/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bilateral salpingectomy has been proposed to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer, but it is not clear whether the surgery affects ovarian reserve. This study compares the impact of laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease with or without prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve.

METHODS

Records were reviewed for 373 premenopausal women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy with ovarian reserve for benign uterine diseases. The serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2), and three-dimensional antral follicle count (AFC) were assessed before surgery and 3 and 9 months postoperatively to evaluate ovarian reserve. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy. The incidence of pelvic diseases was monitored until the ninth month after surgery.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two surgery groups in terms of baseline AMH, E2, FSH, LH, and AFC (all P > 0.05). There was no difference in potential bias factors, including patient age, operative time, and blood loss (all P > 0.05). There was also no significant difference between the two groups 3 months after surgery with respect to AMH (P = 0.763), E2 (P = 0.264), FSH (P = 0.478), LH (P = 0.07), and AFC (P = 0.061). Similarly, there were no differences between groups 9 months after surgery for AMH (P = 0.939), E2 (P = 0.137), FSH (P = 0.276), LH (P = 0.07) and AFC (P = 0.066). At 9 months after the operation, no patients had malignant ovarian tumors. The incidences of benign ovarian tumors in the salpingectomy group were 0 and 2.68 % at 3 and 9 months after surgery, respectively, and the corresponding values in the control group were 0 and 5.36 %. The incidences of pelvic inflammatory disease in the salpingectomy group were 10.72 and 8.04 % at 3 and 9 months after surgery, respectively, while corresponding values in the control group were 24.13 and 16.09 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy did not damage the ovarian reserve of reproductive-age women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy. Prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy might be a good method to prevent the development of ovarian cancer. Larger clinical trials with longer follow-up times are needed to further evaluate the risks and benefits.

摘要

背景

双侧输卵管切除术已被提议用于降低卵巢癌的风险,但目前尚不清楚该手术是否会影响卵巢储备功能。本研究比较了腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性疾病时是否行预防性双侧输卵管切除术对卵巢储备的影响。

方法

回顾性分析了 373 例因良性子宫疾病行腹腔镜子宫切除术且保留卵巢储备功能的绝经前妇女的病历资料。在术前及术后 3 个月和 9 个月,评估血清抗苗勒管激素(AMH)、卵泡刺激素(FSH)、黄体生成素(LH)、雌二醇(E2)和三维窦卵泡计数(AFC),以评估卵巢储备功能。根据是否行预防性双侧输卵管切除术,将患者分为两组。术后 9 个月监测盆腔疾病的发生情况。

结果

两组患者在基线 AMH、E2、FSH、LH 和 AFC 方面无显著差异(均 P>0.05)。患者年龄、手术时间和出血量等潜在偏倚因素无差异(均 P>0.05)。术后 3 个月,两组间 AMH(P=0.763)、E2(P=0.264)、FSH(P=0.478)、LH(P=0.07)和 AFC(P=0.061)差异均无统计学意义。术后 9 个月,两组间 AMH(P=0.939)、E2(P=0.137)、FSH(P=0.276)、LH(P=0.07)和 AFC(P=0.066)差异均无统计学意义。术后 9 个月时,无患者发生卵巢恶性肿瘤。输卵管切除术组术后 3 个月和 9 个月的良性卵巢肿瘤发生率分别为 0 和 2.68%,对照组分别为 0 和 5.36%。输卵管切除术组术后 3 个月和 9 个月的盆腔炎发生率分别为 10.72%和 8.04%,对照组分别为 24.13%和 16.09%。

结论

对于行腹腔镜子宫切除术的生育期妇女,预防性双侧输卵管切除术不会损害其卵巢储备功能。预防性双侧输卵管切除术可能是预防卵巢癌发生的一种较好方法。需要更大规模的临床试验和更长时间的随访来进一步评估其风险和获益。