Outcomes of mohs microgrpahic resection for cutaneous malignancy involving the scrotum.

INTRODUCTION

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and extramammary Paget's Disease (EMPD) of the scrotum are exceedingly rare. Given their propensity for local invasion and treatment with wide local excision, they can be highly morbid conditions. Outcomes of Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) for scrotal cutaneous malignancy is not well described in current literature. We hypothesized that MMS for scrotal cutaneous malignancy would provide equivalent or improved oncologic outcomes while limiting the morbidity associated with wide excision.

MATERIALS/METHODS: This is a retrospective review and analysis of a prospectively maintained database spanning entries from 2005 to 2019. Collected data included general patient characteristics and surgical characteristics reported on a per lesion basis. MMS was performed by our institution's department of dermatology using their standard technique.

RESULTS

Overall, a total of 26 consecutive patients with 28 lesions (SCC or EMPD) were analyzed. Out of our cohort of 15 patients with 16 scrotal SCC lesions, 10 (66%) patients were current or former smokers, 4 (26%) were immunosuppressed, and 2 (13%) had HPV infections. The median preoperative and postoperative size of SCC lesions were 5.7cm [2] and 20.2cm [2] respectively. There was one (6%) oncologic recurrence of SCC of the scrotum and one (6%) local wound complication. Our cohort also included 11 patients with 12 scrotal EMPD lesions. One patient (9%) had an underlying associated malignancy (prostate cancer). The preoperative and postoperative area of lesions were 50.6cm [2] and 96.4cm [2] respectively. One (9%) EMPD lesion had a positive final margin at resection requiring reoperation. After achieving negative surgical margins, no patients in this cohort had an oncologic recurrence. 3 (26%) scrotal EMPD cases had local wound postoperative complications, only one required reoperation.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first case series focused on MMS for both SCC and EMPD with scrotal involvement. Our data suggests that MMS for scrotal cutaneous malignancy may improve oncologic outcomes and may decreases local post-operative reconstructive issues when compared to reported outcomes of treatment with wide local excision. When able, scrotal cutaneous malignancy patients should be referred to urologists at centers with MMS capabilities as it likely will improve their outcomes. The urologist should maintain active involvement with these patients to coordinate this complex and advanced pattern of care.