Department of Gastroenterology, Viseu Unit, Tondela-Viseu Hospital Centre, Viseu, Portugal.
IBD Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Universita Cattolica, Rome, Italy.
Dig Liver Dis. 2021 Dec;53(12):1571-1579. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.05.038. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
The role of thiopurines in therapeutic algorithms of Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC) is being questioned. This work aimed to investigate current practice and future perspectives of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) physicians regarding the efficacy, safety, and role of precision medicine with thiopurines in IBD.
A 29-questions web-based survey was developed and distributed to IBD physicians worldwide.
We collected the complete answers of 408 physicians from 50 countries. Most participants were experienced physicians in IBD; 26.0% met our definition of "IBD expert". Four physicians reported to not use thiopurines in clinical practice. Most respondents used thiopurines in monotherapy and in combination therapy, both in CD and UC. Respondents tended to consider thiopurines as drugs with a good safety profile, with the agreement of 61.5% of the overall cohort. A minority of physicians (~6%) considered that thiopurines will not be used in the future in IBD patients, while 57.8% believed that these drugs will still be used, in mono and combination therapy.
Despite the many emerging treatments in IBD, according to the beliefs of most physicians surveyed, thiopurines will still be an important part of the treatment algorithm of both CD and UC.
巯嘌呤类药物在克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)治疗方案中的作用正受到质疑。本研究旨在调查炎症性肠病(IBD)医生对 IBD 精准医学中巯嘌呤类药物的疗效、安全性和作用的当前实践和未来展望。
开发了一个包含 29 个问题的基于网络的调查,并分发给全球的 IBD 医生。
我们收集了来自 50 个国家的 408 名医生的完整答案。大多数参与者是 IBD 经验丰富的医生;26.0%符合我们的“IBD 专家”定义。有 4 位医生报告在临床实践中不使用巯嘌呤类药物。大多数受访者在 CD 和 UC 中均使用单药和联合治疗来使用巯嘌呤类药物。受访者倾向于认为巯嘌呤类药物具有良好的安全性,总体队列中有 61.5%的人表示同意。少数医生(约 6%)认为巯嘌呤类药物在未来不会用于 IBD 患者,而 57.8%的医生认为这些药物仍将用于单药和联合治疗。
尽管 IBD 中有许多新兴的治疗方法,但根据大多数接受调查的医生的看法,巯嘌呤类药物仍将是 CD 和 UC 治疗方案的重要组成部分。