Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Sep;56(6):1030-1043. doi: 10.1111/apt.17128. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
Thiopurines remain recommended as maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Despite their widespread use, long-term effectiveness data are sparse and safety is an increasingly debated topic which thwarts proper delineation in the current IBD treatment algorithm.
To document effectiveness and safety of thiopurine monotherapy in patients with IBD, using the population-based IBD South-Limburg (IBDSL) cohort METHODS: All patients starting thiopurine monotherapy as maintenance between 1991 and 2014 were included. Therapy was defined as effective if there was no escalation to biologicals, no course of corticosteroids, no surgery and no hospitalisation for active disease during treatment. Long-term effectiveness was assessed by adjusting for differences in follow-up using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Mid- to long-term safety regarding cancer incidence and clinically relevant liver disease was documented.
In total, 1016 patients (643 Crohn's disease [CD]; 373 ulcerative colitis [UC]) received thiopurine monotherapy at a median of 15.2 (Q1-Q3 4.2-48.5) months after diagnosis. During follow-up, effectiveness rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 64%, 45%, 32%, respectively, in CD and and 66%, 41%, 36%, respectively in UC. No statistically significant differences in effectiveness were observed after stratification for era of initiation (pre-biological vs biological, CD: p = 0.56; UC: p = 0.43). Sixteen non-melanoma skin cancers (incidence rate [IR] 3.33/1000 PY), five lymphomas (IR 1.04/1000 PY) and one urinary tract cancer (IR 0.21/1000 PY) were recorded. Two cases of portal hypertension were identified.
In real-world practice, thiopurine monotherapy remains effective, safe and durable for patients with CD or UC, including in the era of biologics.
硫嘌呤类药物仍被推荐作为炎症性肠病(IBD)患者的维持治疗药物。尽管它们被广泛使用,但长期有效性数据仍然缺乏,安全性是一个日益受到争议的话题,这使得当前的 IBD 治疗算法无法正确界定。
使用基于人群的 IBD 南林堡(IBDSL)队列,记录硫嘌呤单药治疗 IBD 患者的有效性和安全性。
纳入 1991 年至 2014 年间开始硫嘌呤单药维持治疗的所有患者。如果在治疗期间没有升级为生物制剂、没有使用皮质类固醇、没有手术或因疾病活动而住院,则定义为治疗有效。通过使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析调整随访差异来评估长期有效性。记录癌症发病率和临床相关肝病的中至长期安全性。
共有 1016 名患者(643 例克罗恩病[CD];373 例溃疡性结肠炎[UC])在诊断后中位数为 15.2(四分位距 4.2-48.5)个月开始接受硫嘌呤单药治疗。在随访期间,CD 的 1 年、5 年和 10 年有效性率分别为 64%、45%、32%,UC 分别为 66%、41%、36%。在起始时代(生物前与生物,CD:p=0.56;UC:p=0.43)分层后,有效性没有统计学上的显著差异。记录了 16 例非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(发病率[IR]3.33/1000 人年)、5 例淋巴瘤(IR 1.04/1000 人年)和 1 例尿路癌(IR 0.21/1000 人年)。发现 2 例门脉高压。
在真实世界实践中,硫嘌呤单药治疗仍然对 CD 或 UC 患者有效、安全且持久,包括在生物制剂时代。