Suppr超能文献

体育干预对儿童和青少年认知和学业成绩的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of physical education interventions on cognition and academic performance outcomes in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Navarrabiomed, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain

Escuela de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, el Deporte y la Salud, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2021 Nov;55(21):1224-1232. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104112. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of interventions aimed at optimising the quantity and quality of physical education (PE) on cognition and academic performance in children and adolescents.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Studies from electronic databases from inception to 3 January 2021 were identified.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Experimental studies that assessed the effect of quantity-based (ie, increasing the amount of curriculum time allocated to PE) or quality-based (ie, increasing students' participation in physical activity during PE) PE interventions, or both, on changes in cognition and/or academic performance in youth (aged 5-18 years) were included.

RESULTS

19 trials comprising 8676 youth (46.5% girls) were included. Individual quality-based PE interventions increased cognition performance (Hedges' g=0.38, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.60; =83.70%), mainly in primary education settings (g=0.48, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.89; =90.43%). Academic performance, principally mathematics-related skills, was also increased by quality-based PE interventions (g=0.15, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.24; =41.75%). Among these interventions, teaching strategies favoured similar results, but without heterogeneity in the results (g=0.12, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.18; =0%). In contrast, quantity-based PE interventions had a very small and non-significant effect on academic performance (g=0.09, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.24; Q=11.65; =48.48%). Finally, there were no differences between the three PE interventions (ie, quantity, quality, and combined PE interventions) in regard to academic performance.

CONCLUSION

Improving the quality of PE classes may improve students' cognition and academic performance in children and adolescents. Importantly, allocating more time for PE does not seem to compromise this performance.

摘要

目的

确定旨在优化体育课数量和质量的干预措施对儿童和青少年认知和学业成绩的影响。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

资料来源

从电子数据库中检索从成立到 2021 年 1 月 3 日的研究。

纳入研究的选择标准

评估基于数量的(即增加分配给体育课的课程时间量)或基于质量的(即增加学生在体育课期间的身体活动参与度)体育课干预措施,或两者结合对年轻人(5-18 岁)认知和/或学业成绩变化的影响的实验研究。

结果

纳入了 19 项试验,共涉及 8676 名青少年(46.5%为女孩)。单独的基于质量的体育课干预措施提高了认知表现(Hedges' g=0.38,95%CI 0.15 至 0.60; =83.70%),主要是在小学教育环境中(g=0.48,95%CI 0.07 至 0.89; =90.43%)。基于质量的体育课干预措施还提高了学业成绩,主要是与数学相关的技能(g=0.15,95%CI 0.06 至 0.24; =41.75%)。在这些干预措施中,教学策略也取得了类似的结果,但结果没有异质性(g=0.12,95%CI 0.05 至 0.18; =0%)。相比之下,基于数量的体育课干预措施对学业成绩的影响非常小且无统计学意义(g=0.09,95%CI -0.05 至 0.24; Q=11.65; =48.48%)。最后,三种体育课干预措施(即数量、质量和综合体育课干预措施)在学业成绩方面没有差异。

结论

提高体育课的质量可能会提高儿童和青少年的认知和学业成绩。重要的是,为体育课分配更多时间似乎不会影响这一表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验