• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞用于双侧全膝关节置换术后疼痛缓解的比较:一项非随机对照试验。

Comparison of adductor canal block with femoral nerve block for post-operative pain relief after bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A non-randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Krishna Vamshi, Govil Nishith, Tripathi Mukesh, Jain Gaurav, Goyal Tarun, Aggarwal Shantanu

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2021 May;65(Suppl 2):S80-S85. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1317_20. Epub 2021 May 10.

DOI:10.4103/ija.IJA_1317_20
PMID:34188260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8191188/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pain perception and pain threshold vary from one individual to another and also differ in the right and left limbs leading to an inter-cerebral pain variability bias and inter-patient pain variability bias. To date, data comparing adductor canal block (ACB) with femoral nerve block (FNB) in the same patient who underwent bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain limited.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, non-randomised, controlled study. Patients scheduled for bilateral TKA with central neuraxial anaesthesia received every 12-hourly intermittent boluses of 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% in two different peripheral nerve blocks (ACB and FNB) in either of the lower limbs postoperatively. The primary outcome was to assess postoperative VAS score, and the secondary outcomes were muscle strength of the quadriceps muscle and degree of flexion at the knee joint.

RESULTS

Among the 80 patients assessed for eligibility, 72 patients were enroled, and 69 were included in the final analysis. VAS scores after the two blocks during rest at 30 minutes, 6 hours, 12 hours and 48 hours post-operatively had no significant difference. VAS scores during rest at 24 hours and on doing exercise at 24 hours and 48 hours showed a significant difference. Quadriceps muscle strength and degree of flexion of knee at 24 hours and 48 hours post-operatively did show a significant difference in favour of the ACB over FNB.

CONCLUSION

ACB provides equivalent analgesia in comparison with FNB at rest and during passive exercise up to 48 hours post-operatively. ACB significantly preserved motor power of quadriceps muscles when compared with FNB with no added complications.

摘要

背景与目的

疼痛感知和疼痛阈值因人而异,且左右肢体也存在差异,从而导致脑间疼痛变异性偏差和患者间疼痛变异性偏差。迄今为止,在接受双侧全膝关节置换术(TKA)的同一患者中比较内收肌管阻滞(ACB)与股神经阻滞(FNB)的资料仍然有限。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、非随机对照研究。计划接受双侧TKA并采用椎管内麻醉的患者,术后在双下肢的两种不同外周神经阻滞(ACB和FNB)中,每12小时接受一次15 mL 0.5%罗哌卡因的间歇性推注。主要结局是评估术后视觉模拟评分(VAS),次要结局是股四头肌肌力和膝关节屈曲程度。

结果

在80例评估 eligibility的患者中,72例入组,69例纳入最终分析。术后30分钟、6小时、12小时和48小时静息时两种阻滞的VAS评分无显著差异。术后24小时静息时以及24小时和48小时运动时的VAS评分有显著差异。术后24小时和48小时股四头肌肌力和膝关节屈曲程度在ACB组优于FNB组,差异有统计学意义。

结论

ACB与FNB相比,在术后48小时内静息和被动运动时提供同等的镇痛效果。与FNB相比,ACB显著保留了股四头肌的运动能力,且无额外并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76ac/8191188/e488f47a3c67/IJA-65-80-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76ac/8191188/e488f47a3c67/IJA-65-80-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76ac/8191188/e488f47a3c67/IJA-65-80-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of adductor canal block with femoral nerve block for post-operative pain relief after bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A non-randomised controlled trial.内收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞用于双侧全膝关节置换术后疼痛缓解的比较:一项非随机对照试验。
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 May;65(Suppl 2):S80-S85. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1317_20. Epub 2021 May 10.
2
Effects of multi-site infiltration analgesia on pain management and early rehabilitation compared with femoral nerve or adductor canal block for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.全膝关节置换术患者多部位浸润镇痛与股神经或收肌管阻滞相比对疼痛管理和早期康复的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Int Orthop. 2017 Jan;41(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3278-0. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
3
Does Patient Perception Differ Following Adductor Canal Block and Femoral Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Simultaneous Bilateral Randomized Study.全膝关节置换术中内收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞术后患者感知是否存在差异?一项双侧同步随机研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1856-1861. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.025. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
4
A randomised controlled trial comparing adductor canal block and femoral nerve block for knee arthroplasty.一项比较收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞用于膝关节置换术的随机对照试验。
Singapore Med J. 2019 Mar;60(3):145-149. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2018082. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
5
Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study.收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛的随机、双盲研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):526-32. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000015.
6
[Comparison of the effects of sciatic nerve block combined with continuted femoral nerve block or continuted adductor canal block on pain and motor function after total knee arthroplasty].[坐骨神经阻滞联合持续股神经阻滞或持续收肌管阻滞对全膝关节置换术后疼痛及运动功能影响的比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May 15;38(5):556-561. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202402048.
7
Adductor canal block provides better performance after total knee arthroplasty compared with femoral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与股神经阻滞相比,收肌管阻滞在全膝关节置换术后效果更佳:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2016 May;40(5):925-33. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2998-x. Epub 2015 Oct 10.
8
Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, blinded study.股神经阻滞与收肌管阻滞对全膝关节置换术后股四头肌肌力、活动度和疼痛的影响:一项随机、盲法研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000169.
9
Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block combined with sciatic nerve block as an anesthetic technique for hindfoot and ankle surgery: A prospective, randomized noninferiority trial.内收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞联合坐骨神经阻滞作为后足和踝关节手术的麻醉技术:一项前瞻性、随机非劣效性试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(52):e5758. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005758.
10
Comparison of Analgesic Effects of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block, Femoral Triangle Block, and Adductor Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.全膝关节置换术后连续股神经阻滞、股三角阻滞和收肌管阻滞的镇痛效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
Clin J Pain. 2024 Jun 1;40(6):373-382. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001211.

引用本文的文献

1
[Comparison of the effects of sciatic nerve block combined with continuted femoral nerve block or continuted adductor canal block on pain and motor function after total knee arthroplasty].[坐骨神经阻滞联合持续股神经阻滞或持续收肌管阻滞对全膝关节置换术后疼痛及运动功能影响的比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May 15;38(5):556-561. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202402048.
2
Triple injection peri-sartorius (TIPS) block for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: Randomised controlled study.全膝关节置换术后用于术后镇痛的缝匠肌周围三联注射(TIPS)阻滞:随机对照研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Mar;68(3):287-292. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_936_23. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring cocktails, remixes and innovations in regional nerve blocks: The clinical research journey continues.探索区域神经阻滞的联合应用、改良方法及创新:临床研究之旅仍在继续。
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Dec;64(12):1003-1006. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1517_20. Epub 2020 Dec 12.
2
An Exact Localization of Adductor Canal and Its Clinical Significance: A Cadaveric Study.内收肌管的精确定位及其临床意义:一项尸体研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;13(2):284-286. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_35_19.
3
The Effect of Prehabilitation on Postoperative Outcome in Patients Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Comparison of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block and knee periarticular infiltration for postoperative pain and functional outcomes in knee arthroplasty - A randomised trial.
超声引导下膝神经阻滞与膝关节周围浸润用于膝关节置换术后疼痛及功能结局的比较——一项随机试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Oct;67(10):885-892. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_449_23. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
4
Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (R-PACK); a new technique for relief of chronic posterior knee pain.超声引导下腘动脉与膝关节囊之间的脉冲射频治疗(R-PACK):一种缓解膝关节后部慢性疼痛的新技术。
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;66(6):474-475. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_47_22. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
5
Comparison of sensory posterior articular nerves of the knee (SPANK) block versus infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK) block when added to adductor canal block for pain control and knee rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty---A prospective randomised trial.全膝关节置换术后,在股收肌管阻滞基础上加用膝关节感觉后关节神经(SPANK)阻滞与腘动脉和膝关节囊之间浸润(IPACK)阻滞对疼痛控制和膝关节康复效果的比较——一项前瞻性随机试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Nov;65(11):792-797. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_682_21. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
6
Advancing, strengthening and reshaping obstetric critical care with Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS).利用床旁超声(POCUS)推进、加强和重塑产科重症监护。
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Oct;65(10):711-715. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_924_21. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
7
Neural blocks at the helm of a paradigm shift in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).神经阻滞引领术后加速康复(ERAS)的范式转变。
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Sep;65(Suppl 3):S99-S103. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_807_21. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
术前康复对初次全膝关节置换术后患者手术结果的影响。
Med Arch. 2018 Dec;72(6):439-443. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.439-443.
4
Advances in regional anaesthesia: A review of current practice, newer techniques and outcomes.区域麻醉的进展:当前实践、新技术及结果综述
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;62(2):94-102. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_433_17.
5
Adductor canal block for post-operative analgesia after simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement: A randomised controlled trial to study the effect of addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine.双侧全膝关节置换术后内收肌管阻滞用于术后镇痛:一项研究在罗哌卡因中添加右美托咪定效果的随机对照试验。
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Nov;61(11):903-909. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_277_17.
6
Managing acute post-operative pain: Advances, challenges and constraints.急性术后疼痛管理:进展、挑战与限制
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Mar;61(3):189-191. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_110_17.
7
Does Patient Perception Differ Following Adductor Canal Block and Femoral Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Simultaneous Bilateral Randomized Study.全膝关节置换术中内收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞术后患者感知是否存在差异?一项双侧同步随机研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1856-1861. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.025. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
8
Defining the Location of the Adductor Canal Using Ultrasound.超声定位收肌管。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):241-245. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000539.
9
The Risk of Falls After Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Use of a Femoral Nerve Block Versus an Adductor Canal Block: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.全膝关节置换术后使用股神经阻滞与内收肌管阻滞的跌倒风险:一项双盲随机对照研究。
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1696-703. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001237.
10
Continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty for mobilisation capability and pain treatment: a randomised and blinded clinical trial.全膝关节置换术后连续收肌管阻滞与连续股神经阻滞对活动能力及疼痛治疗的效果:一项随机双盲临床试验
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Mar;136(3):397-406. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2403-7. Epub 2016 Jan 11.