• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于检测重症患者不良事件的《重症监护病房触发工具》日文版的开发。

Development of the Japanese version of the Intensive Care Unit Trigger Tool to detect adverse events in critically ill patients.

作者信息

Aikawa Gen, Sakuramoto Hideaki, Ouchi Akira, Ono Chiemi, Hoshino Tetsuya, Kido Takahiro, Inoue Yoshiaki, Asano Yoshihiro, Hidaka Kikue

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Faculty of Medicine University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Japan.

Intensive Care Unit University of Tsukuba Hospital Tsukuba Japan.

出版信息

Acute Med Surg. 2021 Jun 22;8(1):e672. doi: 10.1002/ams2.672. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1002/ams2.672
PMID:34188941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8218996/
Abstract

AIM

The Intensive Care Unit Trigger Tool (ICUTT) was developed to detect adverse events (AEs) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the ICUTT (ICUTT-J).

METHODS

The translation of ICUTT was carried out based on the guideline for translation of instruments. Subsequently, two review teams independently reviewed 50 patients' medical records using the ICUTT-J, and agreement regarding the presence and number of AEs was evaluated to ensure reliability.

RESULTS

The ICUTT-J was submitted to the authors of the original ICUTT, who confirmed it as being equivalent to the original version. The item-content validity index and scale-content validity index were 1.00 and 1.00, respectively. Interrater reliability showed moderate agreement of κ = 0.52 in terms of the presence of AEs and linear weighting of κ = 0.49 (95% confidence interval, 0.28, 0.71) in terms of the number of AEs.

CONCLUSION

This study's findings suggest that the ICUTT-J is valid and moderately reliable for use in ICUs.

摘要

目的

开发重症监护病房触发工具(ICUTT)以检测重症监护病房(ICU)患者的不良事件(AE)。本研究的目的是确定日语版ICUTT(ICUTT-J)的有效性和可靠性。

方法

根据工具翻译指南对ICUTT进行翻译。随后,两个审查小组使用ICUTT-J独立审查了50份患者病历,并评估了关于AE存在情况和数量的一致性,以确保可靠性。

结果

ICUTT-J提交给了原始ICUTT的作者,他们确认其与原始版本等效。条目内容效度指数和量表内容效度指数分别为1.00和1.00。评分者间信度显示,在AE存在情况方面,κ = 0.52,具有中度一致性;在AE数量方面,κ = 0.49(95%置信区间,0.28,0.71),具有线性加权的中度一致性。

结论

本研究结果表明,ICUTT-J在ICU中使用是有效且具有中度可靠性的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f0/8218996/07deb15bedaa/AMS2-8-e672-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f0/8218996/683918f57af7/AMS2-8-e672-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f0/8218996/07deb15bedaa/AMS2-8-e672-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f0/8218996/683918f57af7/AMS2-8-e672-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f0/8218996/07deb15bedaa/AMS2-8-e672-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the Japanese version of the Intensive Care Unit Trigger Tool to detect adverse events in critically ill patients.用于检测重症患者不良事件的《重症监护病房触发工具》日文版的开发。
Acute Med Surg. 2021 Jun 22;8(1):e672. doi: 10.1002/ams2.672. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
Translation and Adaptation of the Japanese Version of the Revised Parental Stressor Scale: Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.《修订版父母压力量表:儿科重症监护病房》日文版的翻译与改编
Cureus. 2024 Jul 12;16(7):e64389. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64389. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU): translation, retranslation and validation into Swedish intensive care settings.重症监护病房意识模糊评估方法(CAM-ICU):翻译成瑞典语、再翻译及在瑞典重症监护环境中的验证
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Aug;51(7):888-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01340.x.
4
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the behavioral pain scale in intubated and non-intubated critically ill patients: Two cross-sectional studies.行为疼痛量表中文版在插管和非插管重症患者中的信效度:两项横断面研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Sep;61:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 May 27.
5
Adverse Events Detection Through Global Trigger Tool Methodology: Results From a 5-Year Study in an Italian Hospital and Opportunities to Improve Interrater Reliability.通过全球触发工具方法学检测不良事件:意大利一家医院 5 年研究的结果及提高评价者间可靠性的机会。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Sep 1;17(6):451-457. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000381.
6
Impact of adverse events on patient outcomes in a Japanese intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study.不良事件对日本重症监护病房患者结局的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
Nurs Open. 2021 Nov;8(6):3271-3280. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1040. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
7
Richards-Campbell sleep questionnaire: psychometric properties of Chinese critically ill patients.里查兹-坎贝尔睡眠问卷:中国危重症患者的心理测量特性。
Nurs Crit Care. 2019 Nov;24(6):362-368. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12357. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
8
The German version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for critically ill adults : A prospective validation study.用于危重症成人的重症监护疼痛观察工具德文版:一项前瞻性验证研究。
Anaesthesist. 2019 Dec;68(12):836-842. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-00694-5. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
9
Arabic intensive care delirium screening checklist's validity and reliability: A multicenter study.阿拉伯语重症监护谵妄筛查检查表的有效性和可靠性:一项多中心研究。
J Crit Care. 2019 Dec;54:170-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
10
Development of the Japanese version of the State Behavioral Scale for critically ill children.危重症儿童状态行为量表日文版的编制
Acute Med Surg. 2018 Dec 21;6(2):101-108. doi: 10.1002/ams2.379. eCollection 2019 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Trigger Tool-Based Automated Adverse Event Detection in Electronic Health Records: Systematic Review.电子健康记录中基于触发工具的自动不良事件检测:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 30;20(5):e198. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9901.
2
Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and harm in Emergency Medical Services.开发一种触发工具以识别紧急医疗服务中的不良事件和伤害。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Jun;34(6):391-397. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205746. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
3
Outcome of adverse events and medical errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
重症监护病房不良事件和医疗差错的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Med Qual. 2015 Jan-Feb;30(1):23-30. doi: 10.1177/1062860613514770. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
4
Assessment of adverse events in medical care: lack of consistency between experienced teams using the global trigger tool.医疗保健中不良事件的评估:使用全球触发工具的经验丰富团队之间缺乏一致性。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Apr;21(4):307-14. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000279. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
5
'Global trigger tool' shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured.“全球触发工具”显示,医院中的不良事件可能比之前测量的高出十倍。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):581-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0190.
6
Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool.加拿大儿科触发工具的开发和验证描述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 May;20(5):416-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.041152. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
7
Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care.医疗导致的患者伤害发生率的时间趋势。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 25;363(22):2124-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1004404.
8
Measuring hospital adverse events: assessing inter-rater reliability and trigger performance of the Global Trigger Tool.测量医院不良事件:评估全球触发工具的评价者间可靠性和触发性能。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Aug;22(4):266-74. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq026. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
9
Detection of adverse events in surgical patients using the Trigger Tool approach.使用触发工具方法检测外科手术患者的不良事件。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Aug;17(4):253-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025080.
10
Impact of adverse events on outcomes in intensive care unit patients.不良事件对重症监护病房患者预后的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):2041-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817b879c.