Zicaro Juan Pablo, Garcia-Mansilla Ignacio, Zuain Andres, Yacuzzi Carlos, Costa-Paz Matias
Knee Division, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 1181, Argentina.
World J Orthop. 2021 Jun 18;12(6):423-432. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i6.423.
Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are frequent, and there is still considerable controversy surrounding their diagnosis, natural history and treatment.
To examine patient-reported outcomes, physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of partial ACL tears treated with an intraarticular injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) compared to a control group.
From January 2015 to November 2017, consecutive patients from a single institution with partial ACL tears treated nonoperatively were prospectively evaluated. Partial tears were defined as a positive Lachman test with a clear end-point, a negative pivot-shift and less than 3 mm of side-to-side difference using the KT1000 arthrometer. Patients in group 1 were treated with one intraarticular injection of PRP and specific physical therapy protocol. Control group consisted of patients treated only with physical therapy. Prospective analyzed data included physical examination, Tegner activity level and Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Baseline MRI findings and at 6 mo follow-up were reviewed. Failure was defined as those patients with clinical instability at follow-up that required a subsequent ACL reconstruction.
A total of 40 patients where included, 21 treated with PRP injection with a mean follow-up of 25 mo [standard deviation (SD): 3.6] and 19 in the control group with a mean follow-up of 25 mo (SD: 5.68). Overall failure rate was 32.0% ( = 13). No significant differences were observed between groups regarding subjective outcomes, return to sport and failure rate. MRI findings revealed an improvement in the ACL signal in half of the patients of both groups. However, we did not find a significant relationship between MRI findings and clinical outcomes.
Overall, 95.0% of patients returned to sports at a mean follow-up of 25 mo. Mean time to return to sports was 4 mo. Out of these patients, almost 30.0% in each group had a new episode of instability and required surgery at a median time of 5 mo in group 1 and 8 mo in group 2. The addition of PRP alone was not sufficient to enhance any of the outcome measures evaluated, including MRI images, clinical evaluation and failure rate.
前交叉韧带(ACL)部分撕裂很常见,围绕其诊断、自然病程和治疗仍存在相当大的争议。
与对照组相比,研究关节内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗ACL部分撕裂患者的患者报告结局、体格检查和磁共振成像(MRI)结果。
2015年1月至2017年11月,对来自单一机构的非手术治疗的ACL部分撕裂连续患者进行前瞻性评估。部分撕裂定义为Lachman试验阳性且有明确终点、轴移试验阴性且使用KT1000关节测角仪测量的两侧差异小于3mm。第1组患者接受一次关节内PRP注射及特定的物理治疗方案。对照组仅接受物理治疗。前瞻性分析的数据包括体格检查、Tegner活动水平以及Lysholm和国际膝关节文献委员会评分。回顾基线MRI结果及6个月随访时的结果。失败定义为随访时临床不稳定且需要后续ACL重建的患者。
共纳入40例患者,21例接受PRP注射治疗,平均随访25个月[标准差(SD):3.6],19例在对照组,平均随访25个月(SD:5.68)。总体失败率为32.0%(n = 13)。两组在主观结局、恢复运动情况和失败率方面未观察到显著差异。MRI结果显示两组各有一半患者的ACL信号有所改善。然而,我们未发现MRI结果与临床结局之间存在显著关联。
总体而言,95.0%的患者在平均25个月的随访时恢复运动。恢复运动的平均时间为4个月。在这些患者中,每组近30.0%的患者出现新的不稳定发作,第1组中位时间为5个月,第2组为8个月时需要手术。单独添加PRP不足以改善所评估的任何结局指标,包括MRI图像、临床评估和失败率。