• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科领域的歧视:一项国际欧洲评估(DISDAIN)。

Discrimination in the surgical discipline: an international European evaluation (DISDAIN).

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Leeds, UK.

UVCM (Visceral Medicine and Surgery), Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab050.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrab050
PMID:34189560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8242223/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Negative workplace experiences (NWPEs), such as gender discrimination, bullying, sexual harassment and ethnic discrimination, are concerns in today's surgical society. These negative experiences potentially impair surgeons' performance and might impact patient care or outcomes negatively. This study aimed to assess the experience of NWPEs across the European surgical workforce.

METHODS

A prospective online 34-point questionnaire was designed using a combination of Likert scale, multiple-choice and short-answer questions. Invitations were distributed through surgical associations via email/social media between 1 September and 15 November 2019. Data were analysed using non-parametric methods.

RESULTS

Some 840 complete responses were included in the analysis. The distribution across genders and stage of surgical training was even. Of the respondents, 20 per cent (168 respondents) considered quitting their job, 4.5 per cent (38) took time off and 0.5% (4) left surgery due to NWPEs; 12.9 per cent of females and 4.4 per cent of males experienced some form of physical harassment. Females and those in training were significantly more likely to experience or witness gender discrimination and sexual harassment. Just over half of the respondents (448) did not report negative experiences, with most of these (375 respondents) being unaware of whom to report to. Nearly a fifth of respondents felt that NWPEs influenced patient care or outcomes negatively.

CONCLUSION

NWPEs were frequent, especially among females and those in training. While a substantial proportion of respondents experienced physical harassment, many individuals were unaware of how to raise concerns. Adverse effects on patient outcomes, surgical training and workforce retention indicate a need for urgent action.

摘要

背景

负面工作经历(NWPEs),如性别歧视、欺凌、性骚扰和种族歧视,是当今外科领域关注的问题。这些负面经历可能会影响外科医生的表现,并可能对患者的护理或结果产生负面影响。本研究旨在评估欧洲外科劳动力中 NWPEs 的经历。

方法

使用 Likert 量表、多项选择和简答题的组合,设计了一份前瞻性在线 34 点问卷。邀请通过电子邮件/社交媒体在 2019 年 9 月 1 日至 11 月 15 日期间通过外科协会分发。使用非参数方法分析数据。

结果

共纳入 840 份完整回复进行分析。性别和外科培训阶段的分布均匀。在受访者中,20%(168 人)考虑辞职,4.5%(38 人)休假,0.5%(4 人)因 NWPEs 离开外科;12.9%的女性和 4.4%的男性经历过某种形式的身体骚扰。女性和受训者更有可能经历或目睹性别歧视和性骚扰。超过一半的受访者(448 人)没有报告负面经历,其中大多数(375 人)不知道向谁报告。近五分之一的受访者认为 NWPEs 对患者护理或结果产生负面影响。

结论

NWPEs 很常见,尤其是在女性和受训者中。虽然相当一部分受访者经历了身体骚扰,但许多人不知道如何提出担忧。对患者结果、外科培训和劳动力保留的不利影响表明需要采取紧急行动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/8242223/0753229ead10/zrab050f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/8242223/4ee02249e2cb/zrab050f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/8242223/db9096d60ba3/zrab050f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/8242223/f9374349c281/zrab050f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/8242223/0753229ead10/zrab050f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/8242223/4ee02249e2cb/zrab050f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/8242223/db9096d60ba3/zrab050f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/8242223/f9374349c281/zrab050f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/8242223/0753229ead10/zrab050f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Discrimination in the surgical discipline: an international European evaluation (DISDAIN).外科领域的歧视:一项国际欧洲评估(DISDAIN)。
BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab050.
2
Bullying, discrimination, and sexual harassment among intensive care unit nurses in Australia and New Zealand: An online survey.澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护室护士中的欺凌、歧视和性骚扰:一项在线调查。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Jan;36(1):10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
3
The development of anti-bullying, discrimination and harassment guidance: a survey among the Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT) council members.反欺凌、歧视和骚扰指导意见的制定:对受训外科医师协会理事会成员的调查。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Apr;106(4):364-368. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0071. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
4
Prevalence of bullying, discrimination and sexual harassment in surgery in Australasia.澳大利亚和新西兰外科领域中的欺凌、歧视及性骚扰现象的发生率
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Dec;85(12):905-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.13363. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
5
Do Surgeons React?: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgeons' Response to Harassment of a Colleague During Simulated Operating Theatre Scenarios.外科医生会有反应吗?——模拟手术室场景中外科医生对同事骚扰的反应回顾性分析。
Ann Surg. 2018 Aug;268(2):277-281. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002434.
6
Workplace Harassment and Discrimination in Gynecology: Results of the AAGL Member Survey.妇科领域的工作场所骚扰和歧视:AAGL 会员调查结果。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):838-846. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
7
Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, Sexual Harassment, and the Fear of Retaliation During Surgical Residency Training: A Systematic Review.外科住院医师培训期间的欺凌、歧视、骚扰、性骚扰和报复恐惧:系统评价。
World J Surg. 2022 Jul;46(7):1587-1599. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06432-6. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
8
Gender disparity and sexual harassment in vascular surgery practices.血管外科学实践中的性别差异和性骚扰。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;72(2):692-699. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.071. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
9
Workplace mistreatment and mental health in female surgeons in Pakistan.巴基斯坦女外科医生的工作场所虐待与心理健康。
BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab041.
10
Workplace bullying and sexual harassment among general surgery residents in Colombia.哥伦比亚普通外科住院医师中的工作场所欺凌和性骚扰。
Biomedica. 2023 Jun 30;43(2):252-260. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.6915.

引用本文的文献

1
Woman or surgeon - Not both: Perceptions of support, enablers and barriers in general surgery.女性还是外科医生——不能兼顾:普通外科中对支持、促进因素和障碍的认知
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Oct 11;22:3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.10.002. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Exploring gender disparity in medicine: perceptions of female physicians in Lebanon.探讨医学领域的性别差距:黎巴嫩女医生的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1192. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06131-5.
3
A gender-based review of workplace violence amongst the global health workforce-A scoping review of the literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Bullying and undermining behaviours in surgery: A qualitative study of surgical trainee experiences in the United Kingdom (UK) & Republic of Ireland (ROI).手术中的欺凌和破坏行为:英国和爱尔兰共和国外科受训者经历的定性研究
Int J Surg. 2020 Dec;84:219-225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.031. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
2
Prevalence, Types, and Sources of Bullying Reported by US General Surgery Residents in 2019.2019 年美国普通外科住院医师报告的欺凌现象的流行率、类型和来源。
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2093-2095. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2901.
3
Gender disparity and sexual harassment in vascular surgery practices.
基于性别的全球卫生人力职场暴力综述——文献的范围综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jul 2;4(7):e0003336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003336. eCollection 2024.
4
Specialties preference by gender among medical students at Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, South Africa.南非塞法科马卡托健康科学大学医学生的性别专业偏好。
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2024 Apr 23;66(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/safp.v66i1.5858.
5
Path to success: female leaders in German neurosurgery.成功之路:德国神经外科学领域的女性领导者。
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Oct 14;46(1):269. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02163-5.
6
Workplace bullying and sexual harassment among general surgery residents in Colombia.哥伦比亚普通外科住院医师中的工作场所欺凌和性骚扰。
Biomedica. 2023 Jun 30;43(2):252-260. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.6915.
7
Bridging that gap: a qualitative study of perceptions of equality, diversity and inclusivity in colorectal surgery in the UK and Ireland.弥合差距:英国和爱尔兰对结直肠外科手术中平等、多样性和包容性看法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 10;13(7):e069297. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069297.
8
Religious Identity Discrimination in the Physician Workforce: Insights from Two National Studies of Muslim Clinicians in the US.宗教身份在医师队伍中的歧视:来自美国两名穆斯林临床医生的全国性研究的见解。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Apr;38(5):1167-1174. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07923-5. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
9
Prevalence and health correlates of workplace violence and discrimination against hospital employees - a cross-sectional study in German-speaking Switzerland.瑞士德语区医院员工遭受工作场所暴力和歧视的现况及其与健康的相关性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07602-5.
血管外科学实践中的性别差异和性骚扰。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;72(2):692-699. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.071. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
4
Intimidation and Sexual Harassment during Plastic Surgery Training in the United States.美国整形外科学培训期间的恐吓与性骚扰
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Dec 30;7(12):e2493. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002493. eCollection 2019 Dec.
5
Discrimination, Abuse, Harassment, and Burnout in Surgical Residency Training.外科住院医师培训中的歧视、虐待、骚扰和倦怠。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 31;381(18):1741-1752. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1903759. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
6
Us, Too. Sexual Harassment Within Academic Medicine in the United States.《美国学术界的性骚扰:我们也是受害者》
Am J Med. 2020 Feb;133(2):245-248. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.06.031. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
Association of Coworker Reports About Unprofessional Behavior by Surgeons With Surgical Complications in Their Patients.同事报告外科医生不专业行为与患者手术并发症的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):828-834. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1738.
8
Prevalence of Sexual Harassment in Academic Medicine.学术医学中的性骚扰普遍性。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;179(1):108-111. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4859.
9
Systematic review of the prevalence, impact and mitigating strategies for bullying, undermining behaviour and harassment in the surgical workplace.系统回顾手术工作场所中欺凌、破坏行为和骚扰的流行率、影响和缓解策略。
Br J Surg. 2018 Oct;105(11):1390-1397. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10926. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
10
Discrimination, Bullying and Harassment in Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.外科手术中的歧视、欺凌与骚扰:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2018 Dec;42(12):3867-3873. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4716-5.