Bioengineering & Chronobiology Laboratories; Atlantic Research Center for Information and Communication Technologies (Atlantic), Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, -USA.
Chronobiol Int. 2023 Jan;40(1):63-82. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2021.1939367. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
Several prospective studies consistently report elevated asleep blood pressure (BP) and blunted sleep-time relative systolic BP (SBP) decline (non-dipping) are jointly the most significant prognostic markers of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, including heart failure (HF); therefore, they, rather than office BP measurements (OBPM) and ambulatory awake and 24 h BP means, seemingly are the most worthy therapeutic targets for prevention. Published studies of the 24 h BP pattern in HF are sparse in number and of limited sample size. They report high prevalence of the abnormal non-dipper/riser 24 h SBP patterning. Despite the established clinical relevance of the asleep BP, past as do present hypertension guidelines recommend the diagnosis of hypertension rely on OBPM and, when around-the-clock ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) is conducted to confirm the elevated OBPM, either on the derived 24 h or "daytime" BP means. Additionally, hypertension guidelines do not advise the time-of-day when BP-lowering medications should be ingested, in spite of known ingestion-time differences in their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Between 1976 and 2020, 155 unique trials of ingestion-time differences in the effects of 37 different single and 14 dual-combination hypertension medications, collectively involving 23,972 patients, were published. The vast majority (83.9%) of them found the at-bedtime/evening in comparison to upon-waking/morning treatment schedule resulted in more greatly enhanced: (i) reduction of asleep BP mean without induced sleep-time hypotension; (ii) reduction of the prevalence of the higher CVD risk non-dipper/riser 24 h BP phenotypes; (iii) improvement of kidney function, reduction of cardiac pathology, and with lower incidence of adverse effects. Most notably, no single published randomized trial found significantly better BP-lowering, particularly during sleep, or medical benefits of the most popular upon-waking/morning hypertension treatment-time scheme. Additionally, prospective outcome trials have substantiated that the bedtime relative to the upon-waking, ingestion of BP-lowering medications not only significantly reduces risk of HF but also improves overall CVD event-free survival time.
几项前瞻性研究一致报告,睡眠中的血压升高(BP)和睡眠时间相对收缩压(SBP)下降(非杓型)是心血管疾病(CVD)风险的最重要预后标志物,包括心力衰竭(HF);因此,它们而不是诊室血压测量(OBPM)和动态清醒和 24 小时 BP 平均值,似乎是预防的最有价值的治疗目标。HF 中 24 小时 BP 模式的已发表研究数量较少,样本量有限。它们报告了异常非杓型/升高型 24 小时 SBP 模式的高患病率。尽管已经确定了睡眠中的 BP 的临床相关性,但过去和现在的高血压指南都建议将高血压的诊断依赖于 OBPM,并且当进行 24 小时动态血压监测(ABPM)以确认升高的 OBPM 时,无论是在衍生的 24 小时还是“白天”BP 平均值上。此外,尽管已知其药代动力学和药效动力学存在摄入时间差异,但高血压指南并未建议何时服用降压药物,尽管已知其药代动力学和药效动力学存在摄入时间差异。1976 年至 2020 年,共发表了 155 项关于 37 种单药和 14 种联合降压药物作用的摄入时间差异的独特试验,共涉及 23972 名患者。其中绝大多数(83.9%)发现与起床/早晨治疗方案相比,睡前/傍晚治疗方案导致更显著地增加:(i)降低平均睡眠中的 BP,而不会引起睡眠时间低血压;(ii)降低更高 CVD 风险非杓型/升高型 24 小时 BP 表型的患病率;(iii)改善肾功能,降低心脏病理,降低不良反应发生率。最值得注意的是,没有一项已发表的随机试验发现更好的降压效果,尤其是在睡眠期间,或最受欢迎的起床/早晨高血压治疗时间方案的医学益处。此外,前瞻性结局试验证实,与起床相比,在睡前服用降压药物不仅显著降低 HF 的风险,而且还改善整体 CVD 无事件生存时间。