Suppr超能文献

重新审视微创子宫肌瘤切除术的差异:确定非裔美国女性和白人女性在子宫肌瘤切除手术方式上存在差异的驱动因素。

Rethinking Disparities in Minimally Invasive Myomectomy: Identifying Drivers of Disparate Surgical Approach to Myomectomy Between African American and White Women.

作者信息

Kim Jessica S, Qureshy Zoya, Lazar Ann A, Chen Lee-Lynn, Jacoby Alison, Opoku-Anane Jessica, Lager Jeannette

机构信息

Division of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences (Drs. Kim, Jacoby, Opoku-Anane, and Lager).

School of Medicine (Ms. Qureshy).

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Jan;29(1):65-71.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jun 27.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To identify drivers of disparities among patients undergoing surgical management of myomas when stratified by self-identified patient race.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective institutional review board-approved chart review of all patients who underwent a myomectomy at a large academic center. Surgical approach to myomectomy was classified as abdominal, laparoscopic, or robotic-assisted laparoscopic. Myoma burden was quantified preoperatively using uterine volume, intraoperatively by number of myomas listed on operative report, and postoperatively by myoma weight from pathology reports.

SETTING

A large tertiary care hospital containing a comprehensive myoma treatment center.

PATIENTS

A total of 265 white patients and 121 African American patients who underwent a myomectomy between January 2012 and October 2018 were included in the study population.

INTERVENTIONS

Abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted myomectomy. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted myomectomy were classified as minimally invasive myomectomy. Multivariable logistic regression models and a propensity score matching algorithm were used to match African American (AA) women and white women for myoma burden.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 386 women were included in the study. AA women (31%; n = 121) had higher myoma burden than white women by preoperative imaging (AA: 36% with 3 or more myomas; white: 19% with 3 or more myomas; p <.01) and operative report (>8 AA: 31% vs white 13%; p <.01). Despite this, AA women underwent minimally invasive myomectomy at similar rates as compared with white women when adjusted for myoma burden, body mass index, preoperative hematocrit, hypertension, and surgical indication (adjusted odds ratio 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.2 myomas; p <.01). Sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching found similar results.

CONCLUSION

In this population, AA women had a higher myoma burden than white women. When matched for myoma burden, however, there was no statistically significant difference between rates of minimally invasive myomectomy and abdominal myomectomy. This finding was consistent when controlling for myoma burden measured by preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative methods of measurement. Further studies are needed to better characterize this disparity at other hospitals and to investigate ways to increase access and equity among patients undergoing minimally invasive myomectomy.

摘要

研究目的

确定在按患者自我认定的种族分层时,接受子宫肌瘤手术治疗的患者之间差异的驱动因素。

设计

这是一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性图表审查,研究对象为在一家大型学术中心接受子宫肌瘤切除术的所有患者。子宫肌瘤切除术的手术方式分为开腹、腹腔镜或机器人辅助腹腔镜手术。术前使用子宫体积量化肌瘤负担,术中通过手术报告中列出的肌瘤数量量化,术后通过病理报告中的肌瘤重量量化。

地点

一家设有综合子宫肌瘤治疗中心的大型三级护理医院。

患者

2012年1月至2018年10月期间接受子宫肌瘤切除术的265名白人患者和121名非裔美国患者被纳入研究人群。

干预措施

开腹、腹腔镜和机器人辅助子宫肌瘤切除术。腹腔镜和机器人辅助子宫肌瘤切除术被归类为微创子宫肌瘤切除术。使用多变量逻辑回归模型和倾向评分匹配算法,使非裔美国(AA)女性和白人女性在肌瘤负担方面相匹配。

测量指标及主要结果

共有386名女性纳入研究。通过术前影像学检查(AA:36%有3个或更多肌瘤;白人:19%有3个或更多肌瘤;p<.01)和手术报告(AA>8个:31%,白人:13%;p<.01),AA女性(31%;n = 121)的肌瘤负担高于白人女性。尽管如此,在根据肌瘤负担、体重指数、术前血细胞比容、高血压和手术指征进行调整后,AA女性接受微创子宫肌瘤切除术的比例与白人女性相似(调整后的优势比为1.3;95%置信区间,0.8 - 2.2个肌瘤;p<.01)。使用倾向评分匹配的敏感性分析得出了类似结果。

结论

在该人群中,AA女性的肌瘤负担高于白人女性。然而,在肌瘤负担相匹配的情况下,微创子宫肌瘤切除术和开腹子宫肌瘤切除术的比例在统计学上没有显著差异。当通过术前、术中或术后测量方法控制肌瘤负担时,这一发现是一致的。需要进一步研究以更好地描述其他医院的这种差异,并研究增加接受微创子宫肌瘤切除术患者的可及性和公平性的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验