Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Brazil.
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;282:114145. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114145. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
Although Value-Based Health Care (VBHC) is widely debated and cited, there are few empirical studies focused on how its concepts are understood and applied in real-world contexts. This comparative case study of two prominent adopters in Brazil and Sweden, situated at either end of the spectrum in terms of contextual prerequisites, provides insights into the complex interactions involved in the adoption of value-based strategies. We found that the adoption of VBHC emphasized either health outcomes or costs - not both as suggested by the value equation. This may be linked to broader health system and societal contexts. Implementation can generate tensions with traditional business models, suggesting that providers should first analyze how these strategies align with their internal context. Adoption by a single provider organization is challenging, if not impossible. An effective VBHC transformation seems to require a systematic and systemic approach where all stakeholders need to clearly define the purpose and the scope of the transformation, and together steer their actions and decisions accordingly.
尽管基于价值的医疗保健(VBHC)被广泛讨论和引用,但很少有实证研究关注其概念在实际环境中的理解和应用。本研究对巴西和瑞典这两个在语境先决条件方面处于两极的突出采用者进行了比较案例研究,深入了解了采用基于价值的策略所涉及的复杂相互作用。我们发现,VBHC 的采用要么强调健康结果,要么强调成本 - 而不是价值等式所建议的两者兼顾。这可能与更广泛的卫生系统和社会背景有关。实施可能会与传统商业模式产生紧张关系,这表明提供者首先应该分析这些策略如何与其内部环境保持一致。如果不是不可能,单个提供者组织的采用是具有挑战性的。有效的 VBHC 转型似乎需要系统和全面的方法,所有利益相关者都需要明确界定转型的目的和范围,并共同指导他们的行动和决策。