Texas Center for Joint Replacement, Plano, Texas, USA.
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jul;103-B(7 Supple B):33-37. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-2230.R1.
To achieve the functional benefits of the direct anterior (DA) approach and the fixation benefits of cemented replacement, this study combined the two techniques posing the following questions: does the limited access of the DA approach adversely affect the cement technique?; and does such a cementing technique reduce the incidence of cementless complications?
A consecutive series of 341 patients (360 hips) receiving the DA approach between 2016 and 2018 were reviewed. There were 203 cementless stems and 157 cemented stems. Mean age was 75 years (70 to 86) in the cementless group and 76 years (52 to 94) in the cemented group, with 239 (70%) females in the whole series. Femoral complications were compared between the two groups. Mean follow-up was 1.5 years (0.1 to 4.4) for patients in the cementless group and 1.3 years (0.0 to 3.9) for patients in the cemented group.
The cementless group had a higher rate of femoral complications (8 vs 0; p = 0.011). There were two loose stems and six fractures, all requiring revision. Fractures occurred a mean 14.5 days (2 to 31) postoperatively and loosening at 189 days and 422 days postoperatively. Femoral cementing can be done using the DA approach safely and reduces the number of complications compared with a contemporary cementless series.
A higher rate of early fractures and loosening occurred with cementless stems. This was not observed in our cemented stem cohort and cementing was safely accomplished through the DA approach. The modern femoral cementing process with the DA approach does not add to surgical complexity or time, has fewer early complications, and is a safer option for older patients compared to cementless femoral arthroplasties. Cite this article: 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):33-37.
为了实现直接前入路(DA)的功能优势和骨水泥固定假体的优势,本研究结合了这两种技术,并提出了以下问题:DA 入路的有限通道是否会对骨水泥技术产生不利影响?这种骨水泥技术是否会降低非骨水泥并发症的发生率?
回顾性分析了 2016 年至 2018 年间接受 DA 入路的 341 例患者(360 髋)的连续病例。其中有 203 例非骨水泥假体和 157 例骨水泥假体。非骨水泥组的平均年龄为 75 岁(70 岁至 86 岁),骨水泥组的平均年龄为 76 岁(52 岁至 94 岁),全组有 239 例(70%)女性。比较两组患者的股骨并发症。非骨水泥组患者的平均随访时间为 1.5 年(0.1 年至 4.4 年),骨水泥组患者的平均随访时间为 1.3 年(0.0 年至 3.9 年)。
非骨水泥组股骨并发症发生率较高(8 例 vs 0 例;p = 0.011)。有 2 例假体松动和 6 例骨折,均需要翻修。骨折发生于术后 14.5 天(2 天至 31 天),假体松动发生于术后 189 天和 422 天。通过 DA 入路可以安全地进行股骨骨水泥固定,与同期非骨水泥系列相比,可减少并发症的发生。
非骨水泥假体组出现了较高比例的早期骨折和松动。在我们的骨水泥假体队列中没有观察到这种情况,并且通过 DA 入路安全地完成了骨水泥固定。与非骨水泥股骨假体相比,现代股骨骨水泥技术通过 DA 入路不会增加手术的复杂性和时间,早期并发症更少,是老年患者更安全的选择。