Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Traumaplasty. Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Hip Int. 2024 Jul;34(4):442-451. doi: 10.1177/11207000241239914. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
Anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) decreases the rate of dislocation but increases femoral-sided complications in the way of periprosthetic fractures and component loosening. A cemented prosthesis may reduce femoral-sided complications and improve the risk:benefit profile of anterior approach THA.
Data from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry were analysed for patients undergoing primary THA via the anterior or posterior approach using a cemented polished femoral stem from January 2015 to December 2021. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative percent revision (CPR) for all causes and CPR for femoral component loosening and fracture. The CPR for the primary outcome measures were compared between the anterior and posterior approach and adjusted for age, sex, ASA score, BMI and femoral head size.
The study included 60,739 THAs with cemented stems (10,742 anterior, 49,997 posterior). The rate of revision of the anterior versus the posterior approach did not significantly differ (HR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.74-1.03), = 0.100). Anterior approach THA had a significantly higher rate of revision for femoral component loosening (HR 5.06 [95% CI, 3.08-8.30], < 0.001); and a decreased rate of revision for infection (HR 0.59 [95% CI, 0.43-0.81], = 0.001) and dislocation/instability (HR 0-3 months 0.48 [95% CI, 0.27-0.83], = 0.008; HR >3 months 0.30 [95% CI, 0.15-0.61], < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of revision surgery for fracture between the 2 approaches (HR 1.01 [95% CI, 0.71-1.43]), = 0.975).
There is no significant difference in overall revision rates with cemented femoral fixation performed with an anterior or posterior approach. Cemented fixation performed with the anterior approach partly mitigates femoral complications with no difference in the revision rate for fracture but an increased rate of femoral component loosening.
前路全髋关节置换术 (THA) 降低了脱位率,但增加了股骨侧并发症,包括假体周围骨折和组件松动。使用骨水泥固定的假体可能会减少股骨侧并发症,并改善前路 THA 的风险获益比。
本研究分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,澳大利亚国家关节置换登记处中使用骨水泥抛光股骨柄行前路或后路初次 THA 的患者数据。主要结局测量指标为所有原因的累计翻修率 (CPR) 和股骨组件松动和骨折的 CPR。比较了前路和后路的主要结局测量指标,并根据年龄、性别、ASA 评分、BMI 和股骨头大小进行了调整。
研究共纳入 60739 例使用骨水泥固定的股骨柄的 THA(前路 10742 例,后路 49997 例)。前路与后路的翻修率无显著差异(HR 0.87(95%CI,0.74-1.03), = 0.100)。前路 THA 股骨组件松动的翻修率显著较高(HR 5.06(95%CI,3.08-8.30), < 0.001),感染(HR 0.59(95%CI,0.43-0.81), = 0.001)和脱位/不稳定(0-3 个月 HR 0.48(95%CI,0.27-0.83), = 0.008;>3 个月 HR 0.30(95%CI,0.15-0.61), < 0.001)的翻修率较低。两种方法的骨折翻修率无差异(HR 1.01(95%CI,0.71-1.43), = 0.975)。
使用骨水泥固定股骨时,前路或后路的总体翻修率无显著差异。前路固定可部分减轻股骨并发症,骨折翻修率无差异,但股骨组件松动率增加。