Cortes Javier, Hudgens Stacie, Twelves Chris, Perez Edith A, Awada Ahmad, Yelle Louise, McCutcheon Susan, Kaufman Peter A, Forsythe Anna, Velikova Galina
Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Dec;154(3):509-20. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3633-7. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
The clinical benefit of eribulin versus capecitabine was evaluated using health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from a phase 3 randomized trial in patients with pretreated advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00337103). The study population has been described previously (Kaufman et al. in J Clin Oncol 33:594-601, 2015). Eligible patients received eribulin (1.4 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8) or capecitabine (1.25 g/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1-14) per 21-day cycles. HRQoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-life Questionnaire-Core 30 questions (QLQ-C30) and breast module-23 questions (QLQ-BR23), administered at baseline through 24 months, until disease progression or other antitumor treatment initiation. Minimally important difference (MID) and time to symptom worsening (TSW) were investigated. 1062 (96.4 %) Patients completed the EORTC questionnaire at baseline; overall, compliance was ≥80 %. Patients receiving capecitabine versus eribulin had significantly worse symptoms (higher scores) for nausea/vomiting (MID 8; P < 0.05) and diarrhea (MID 7; P < 0.05). Treatment with eribulin versus capecitabine, led to worse systemic therapy side-effects (dry mouth, different tastes, irritated eyes, feeling ill, hot flushes, headaches, and hair loss; MID 10; P < 0.01). Clinically meaningful worsening was observed for future perspective (MID 10; P < 0.05) with capecitabine and for systemic therapy side-effects scale (MID 10; P < 0.01) with eribulin. Patients receiving capecitabine experienced more-rapid deterioration in body image (by 2.9 months) and future perspective (by 1.4 months; P < 0.05) compared with those on eribulin; the opposite was observed for systemic side-effects where patients receiving eribulin experienced more-rapid deterioration than those receiving capecitabine (by 2 months; P < 0.05). Eribulin and capecitabine were found to have similar impact on patient functioning with no overall difference in HRQoL. Patients receiving eribulin reported worse systemic side-effects of chemotherapy but reduced gastrointestinal toxicity compared with capecitabine.
使用一项针对既往接受过治疗的晚期/转移性乳腺癌患者的3期随机试验中的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)数据,评估了艾瑞布林与卡培他滨的临床获益(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00337103)。该研究人群此前已有描述(考夫曼等人,《临床肿瘤学杂志》33:594 - 601, 2015)。符合条件的患者每21天为一个周期接受艾瑞布林(第1天和第8天静脉注射1.4 mg/m²)或卡培他滨(第1 - 14天口服1.25 g/m²,每日两次)治疗。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷核心30题(QLQ - C30)和乳腺模块23题(QLQ - BR23)评估HRQoL,从基线至24个月进行评估,直至疾病进展或开始其他抗肿瘤治疗。研究了最小重要差异(MID)和症状恶化时间(TSW)。1062例(96.4%)患者在基线时完成了EORTC问卷;总体而言,依从性≥80%。接受卡培他滨与艾瑞布林治疗的患者在恶心/呕吐(MID 8;P < 0.05)和腹泻(MID 7;P < 0.05)方面症状明显更严重(得分更高)。与卡培他滨相比,艾瑞布林治疗导致更严重的全身治疗副作用(口干、味觉异常、眼睛不适、感觉不适、潮热、头痛和脱发;MID 10;P < 0.01)。卡培他滨在未来展望方面(MID 10;P < 0.05)以及艾瑞布林在全身治疗副作用量表方面(MID 10;P < 0.01)观察到具有临床意义的恶化。与接受艾瑞布林治疗的患者相比,接受卡培他滨治疗的患者身体形象恶化更快(快2.9个月),未来展望恶化更快(快1.4个月;P < 0.05);在全身副作用方面则相反,接受艾瑞布林治疗的患者比接受卡培他滨治疗的患者恶化更快(快2个月;P < 0.05)。发现艾瑞布林和卡培他滨对患者功能的影响相似,HRQoL无总体差异。与卡培他滨相比,接受艾瑞布林治疗的患者报告化疗的全身副作用更严重,但胃肠道毒性降低。