Centre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Psychol Med. 2023 Feb;53(3):1038-1048. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721002476. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
Poor sleep is a modifiable risk factor for multiple disorders. Frontline treatments (e.g. cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia) have limitations, prompting a search for alternative approaches. Here, we compare manualized Mindfulness-Based Therapy for Insomnia (MBTI) with a Sleep Hygiene, Education, and Exercise Program (SHEEP) in improving subjective and objective sleep outcomes in older adults.
We conducted a single-site, parallel-arm trial, with blinded assessments collected at baseline, post-intervention and 6-months follow-up. We randomized 127 participants aged 50-80, with a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score ⩾5, to either MBTI ( = 65) or SHEEP ( = 62), both 2 hr weekly group sessions lasting 8 weeks. Primary outcomes included PSQI and Insomnia Severity Index, and actigraphy- and polysomnography-measured sleep onset latency (SOL) and wake after sleep onset (WASO).
Intention-to-treat analysis showed reductions in insomnia severity in both groups [MBTI: Cohen's effect size = -1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.61 to -0.89; SHEEP: = -0.69, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.43], with significantly greater improvement in MBTI. Sleep quality improved equivalently in both groups (MBTI: = -1.19; SHEEP: = -1.02). No significant interaction effects were observed in objective sleep measures. However, only MBTI had reduced WASO (MBTI: = -0.30; SHEEP: = 0.02), SOL (MBTI: = -0.25; SHEEP: = -0.09), and WASO (MBTI: = -0.26; SHEEP ( = -0.18). There was no change in SOL. No participants withdrew because of adverse effects.
MBTI is effective at improving subjective and objective sleep quality in older adults, and could be a valid alternative for persons who have failed or do not have access to standard frontline therapies.
睡眠质量差是多种疾病的可改变风险因素。一线治疗方法(如失眠认知行为疗法)存在局限性,促使人们寻求替代方法。在这里,我们比较了失眠的正念疗法(MBTI)与睡眠卫生、教育和锻炼计划(SHEEP)在改善老年人主观和客观睡眠结果方面的效果。
我们进行了一项单站点、平行臂试验,在基线、干预后和 6 个月随访时进行盲法评估。我们将 127 名年龄在 50-80 岁之间、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分 ⩾5 的参与者随机分为 MBTI(n=65)或 SHEEP(n=62)组,两组均接受每周 2 小时、持续 8 周的团体治疗。主要结局指标包括 PSQI 和失眠严重程度指数,以及活动记录仪和多导睡眠图测量的入睡潜伏期(SOL)和睡眠后觉醒时间(WASO)。
意向治疗分析显示,两组的失眠严重程度均有所减轻[MBTI:Cohen 效应大小 = -1.27,95%置信区间(CI)-1.61 至-0.89;SHEEP: = -0.69,95%CI-0.96 至-0.43],MBTI 组的改善更为显著。两组的睡眠质量均有同等改善(MBTI: = -1.19;SHEEP: = -1.02)。在客观睡眠测量指标中未观察到显著的交互作用效应。然而,只有 MBTI 降低了 WASO(MBTI: = -0.30;SHEEP: = 0.02)、SOL(MBTI: = -0.25;SHEEP: = -0.09)和 WASO(MBTI: = -0.26;SHEEP: = -0.18)。SOL 没有变化。没有参与者因不良反应而退出。
MBTI 可有效改善老年人的主观和客观睡眠质量,对于那些已经失败或无法获得标准一线治疗的人来说,可能是一种有效的替代方法。