Synchronisation in Neural Systems Laboratory, Department of Neuroinformatics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Computational Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Neurophysiology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 AJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Neurosci. 2021 Aug 11;41(32):6864-6877. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2256-20.2021. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
Neural activity at the large-scale population level has been suggested to be consistent with a sequence of brief, quasistable spatial patterns. These "microstates" and their temporal dynamics have been linked to myriad cognitive functions and brain diseases. Most of this research has been performed using EEG, leaving many questions, such as the existence, dynamics, and behavioral relevance of microstates at the level of local field potentials (LFPs), unaddressed. Here, we adapted the standard EEG microstate analysis to triple-area LFP recordings from 192 electrodes in rats to investigate the mesoscopic dynamics of neural microstates within and across brain regions during novelty exploration. We performed simultaneous recordings from the prefrontal cortex, striatum, and ventral tegmental area in male rats during awake behavior (object novelty and exploration). We found that the LFP data can be accounted for by multiple, recurring microstates that were stable for ∼60-100 ms. The simultaneous microstate activity across brain regions revealed rhythmic patterns of coactivations, which we interpret as a novel indicator of inter-regional, mesoscale synchronization. Furthermore, these rhythmic coactivation patterns across microstates were modulated by behavioral states such as movement and exploration of a novel object. These results support the existence of a functional mesoscopic organization across multiple brain areas and present a possible link of the origin of macroscopic EEG microstates to zero-lag neuronal synchronization within and between brain areas, which is of particular interest to the human research community. The coordination of neural activity across the entire brain has remained elusive. Here we combine large-scale neural recordings at fine spatial resolution with the analysis of microstates (i.e., short-lived, recurring spatial patterns of neural activity). We demonstrate that the local activity in different brain areas can be accounted for by only a few microstates per region. These microstates exhibited temporal dynamics that were correlated across regions in rhythmic patterns. We demonstrate that these microstates are linked to behavior and exhibit different properties in the frequency domain during different behavioral states. In summary, LFP microstates provide an insightful approach to studying both mesoscopic and large-scale brain activation within and across regions.
神经活动在大群体水平上被认为与一系列短暂的、准稳定的空间模式一致。这些“微状态”及其时间动态与无数认知功能和脑部疾病有关。这项研究大多是使用脑电图(EEG)进行的,留下了许多问题,例如局部场电位(LFPs)水平的微状态的存在、动态和行为相关性都没有得到解决。在这里,我们采用标准的 EEG 微状态分析方法,对大鼠 192 个电极的三区 LFPs 记录进行了改编,以研究在新颖性探索过程中,大脑区域内和大脑区域之间的神经微状态的中观动态。我们在雄性大鼠清醒行为(物体新颖性和探索)期间,同时从前额叶皮层、纹状体和腹侧被盖区进行记录。我们发现,LFP 数据可以用多个、反复出现的微状态来解释,这些微状态的稳定性约为 60-100ms。大脑区域之间的同时微状态活动揭示了共同激活的节律模式,我们将其解释为区域间中观同步的一种新指标。此外,这些微状态之间的节律性共同激活模式被行为状态(如移动和探索新物体)所调节。这些结果支持了多个大脑区域之间存在功能中观组织的存在,并提出了宏观 EEG 微状态起源与大脑区域内和大脑区域之间零延迟神经元同步之间的可能联系,这对人类研究社区尤其感兴趣。整个大脑的神经活动协调一直难以捉摸。在这里,我们将精细空间分辨率的大规模神经记录与微状态(即短暂、反复出现的神经活动空间模式)分析相结合。我们证明,不同大脑区域的局部活动可以用每个区域的少数微状态来解释。这些微状态表现出跨区域的时间动态,以节律模式相关。我们证明这些微状态与行为有关,并在不同行为状态下表现出不同的频率域特性。总之,LFP 微状态为研究区域内和区域间的中观和大规模大脑激活提供了一种有见地的方法。