相似文献
1
Safe Abortion in Women's Hands: Autonomy and a Human Rights Approach to COVID-19 and Beyond.
Health Hum Rights. 2021 Jun;23(1):191-197.
2
Reproductive Autonomy Is Nonnegotiable, Even in the Time of COVID-19.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Jul;52(2):81-85. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12152. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
3
COVID-19 Abortion Bans and Their Implications for Public Health.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Jul;52(2):65-68. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12139. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
4
Putting abortion pills into women's hands: realizing the full potential of medical abortion.
Contraception. 2018 Feb;97(2):86-89. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
5
Reducing reproductive rights:spousal consent for abortion and sterilisation.
Indian J Med Ethics. 2007 Jul-Sep;4(3):102-3. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2007.041.
6
Update on Reproductive Rights and Women's Mental Health.
Med Clin North Am. 2019 Jul;103(4):751-766. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.02.006.
7
Who safeguards pregnant women's autonomy during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020 Dec;26:100556. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100556. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
8
Women's Reproductive Health and Rights Through the Lens of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2021 May;21(2):e166-e171. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2021.21.02.003. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
9
Abortion and international law: the status and possible extension of women's right to privacy.
J Fam Law. 1981;20(2):241-61.
10
Exploring the ethics of induced abortion.
Indian J Med Ethics. 2005 Jan-Mar;2(1):18-21. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2005.009.
引用本文的文献
1
Abortion in Countries with Restrictive Abortion Laws-Possible Directions and Solutions from the Perspective of Poland.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 20;9(11):1594. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111594.
本文引用的文献
1
2017-19 governmental decisions to allow home use of misoprostol for early medical abortion in the UK.
Health Policy. 2020 Jul;124(7):679-683. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.04.014. Epub 2020 May 23.
2
Telemedicine for Family Planning: A Scoping Review.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020 Jun;47(2):287-316. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
3
Reproductive health under COVID-19 - challenges of responding in a global crisis.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1-3. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1773163.
4
Inequity in Crisis Standards of Care.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 23;383(4):e16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2011359. Epub 2020 May 13.
5
"It gives you autonomy over your own choices": A qualitative study of Canadian abortion patients' experiences with mifepristone and misoprostol.
Contraception. 2020 Jul;102(1):61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
6
'I didn't feel judged': exploring women's access to telemedicine abortion in rural Australia.
J Prim Health Care. 2020 Mar;12(1):49-56. doi: 10.1071/HC19050.
7
Eliminating stigma and discrimination in sexual and reproductive health care: a public health imperative.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 Dec;27(3):1-5. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2019.1697103.
8
Barriers to accessing abortion services and perspectives on using mifepristone and misoprostol at home in Great Britain.
Contraception. 2018 Feb;97(2):177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
9
Self reported outcomes and adverse events after medical abortion through online telemedicine: population based study in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.
BMJ. 2017 May 16;357:j2011. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2011.
10
Self-management of first trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study of women's experiences.
BJOG. 2017 Dec;124(13):2001-2008. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14690. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
Zotero 插件