Suppr超能文献

英国获取堕胎服务的障碍以及在家中使用米非司酮和米索前列醇的观点。

Barriers to accessing abortion services and perspectives on using mifepristone and misoprostol at home in Great Britain.

作者信息

Aiken Abigail R A, Guthrie Katherine A, Schellekens Marlies, Trussell James, Gomperts Rebecca

机构信息

LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA; Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.

Women on Web, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Contraception. 2018 Feb;97(2):177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine reasons for seeking abortion services outside the formal healthcare system in Great Britain, where abortion is legally available.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a mixed-methods study among women resident in England, Scotland, and Wales who requested at-home medication abortion through online telemedicine initiative Women on Web (WoW) between November 22, 2016, and March 22, 2017. We examined the demographics and circumstances of all women requesting early medication abortion and conducted a content analysis of a sample of their anonymized emails to the service to explore their reasons for seeking help.

RESULTS

Over a 4-month period, 519 women contacted WoW seeking medication abortion. These women were diverse with respect to age, parity, and circumstance. One hundred eighty women reported 209 reasons for seeking abortion outside the formal healthcare setting. Among all reasons, 49% were access barriers, including long waiting times, distance to clinic, work or childcare commitments, lack of eligibility for free NHS services, and prior negative experiences of abortion care; 30% were privacy concerns, including lack of confidentiality of services, perceived or experienced stigma, and preferring the privacy and comfort of using pills at home; and 18% were controlling circumstances, including partner violence and partner/family control.

CONCLUSION

Despite the presence of abortion services in Great Britain, a diverse group of women still experiences logistical and personal barriers to accessing care through the formal healthcare system, or prefer the privacy of conducting their abortions in their own homes. Health services commissioning bodies could address existing barriers if supported by policy frameworks.

IMPLICATIONS

The presence of multiple barriers to accessing abortion care in Great Britain highlights the need for future guidelines to recommend a more woman-centered approach to service provision. Reducing the number of clinic visits and designing services to meet the needs of those living in controlling circumstances are particularly important goals.

摘要

目的

在英国(堕胎在该国合法),研究在正规医疗系统之外寻求堕胎服务的原因。

研究设计

我们对居住在英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士的女性进行了一项混合方法研究,这些女性在2016年11月22日至2017年3月22日期间通过在线远程医疗项目“网络上的女性”(WoW)申请在家进行药物流产。我们研究了所有申请早期药物流产女性的人口统计学特征和情况,并对她们发送给该服务机构的匿名电子邮件样本进行了内容分析,以探究她们寻求帮助的原因。

结果

在4个月的时间里,519名女性联系了WoW寻求药物流产。这些女性在年龄、生育状况和情况方面各不相同。180名女性报告了在正规医疗环境之外寻求堕胎的209个原因。在所有原因中,49%是获取障碍,包括等待时间长、距离诊所远、工作或育儿事务、不符合免费国民保健服务资格以及之前堕胎护理的负面经历;30%是隐私担忧,包括服务缺乏保密性、感知或经历的耻辱感以及更喜欢在家服用药物的隐私和舒适度;18%是控制性情况,包括伴侣暴力和伴侣/家庭控制。

结论

尽管英国有堕胎服务,但仍有不同群体的女性在通过正规医疗系统获得护理方面面临后勤和个人障碍,或者更喜欢在自己家中进行堕胎的隐私性。如果有政策框架支持,卫生服务委托机构可以解决现有障碍。

启示

英国在获取堕胎护理方面存在多种障碍,这凸显了未来指南需要推荐一种更以女性为中心的服务提供方式。减少诊所就诊次数以及设计服务以满足处于控制性情况的人群的需求是特别重要的目标。

相似文献

1
Barriers to accessing abortion services and perspectives on using mifepristone and misoprostol at home in Great Britain.
Contraception. 2018 Feb;97(2):177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
2
Factors Associated With Use of an Online Telemedicine Service to Access Self-managed Medical Abortion in the US.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111852. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11852.
5
Medical abortion with mifepristone and home administration of misoprostol up to 63 days' gestation.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jul;93(7):647-53. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12398. Epub 2014 May 23.
7
Implementing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in Norway 1998-2013.
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):643-651. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw270.
9
Mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion: home administration of misoprostol in Guadeloupe.
Contraception. 1999 Sep;60(3):167-72. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00074-8.
10
Low-dose mifepristone 200 mg and vaginal misoprostol for abortion.
Contraception. 1999 Jan;59(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00150-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Telehealth abortion services via Women on Web in Kenya (2013-2019): a descriptive analysis of the characteristics and motivations of the care seekers.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2500828. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2500828. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
3
Childcare as a social determinant of access to healthcare: a scoping review.
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 3;12:1443992. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1443992. eCollection 2024.
5
Patient and health professional attitudes towards the use of telemedicine for abortion care in Britain: Findings from the SACHA study.
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 3;10:20552076241288717. doi: 10.1177/20552076241288717. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Delays in seeking abortion and its determinants among reproductive-age women based on the Ethiopian Demographic and health survey.
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 26;10(19):e38477. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38477. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
7
The experiences and perspectives of abortion seekers who travel for care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 11;10(10):CD015565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015565.
8
The Role of Electronic Health Tools in Unwanted Pregnancy Prevention, Abortion and Post-Abortion Follow-Up: A Systematic Review.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2023 Sep 8;28(5):487-503. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_312_20. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
9
Experiences seeking, sourcing, and using abortion pills at home in the United States through an online telemedicine service.
SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100075. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
10
Reach, experience, and acceptability of an abortion self-care intervention in Bolivia: a mixed-methods evaluation.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2139888. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2139888.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of very early medical termination of pregnancy: a cohort study.
BJOG. 2017 Dec;124(13):1993-1999. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14904. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
3
Self-management of first trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study of women's experiences.
BJOG. 2017 Dec;124(13):2001-2008. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14690. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
4
Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Jun;49(2):95-102. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12024. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
5
Brief background to Irish abortion law.
BJOG. 2017 Jul;124(8):1216. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14486. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
7
Reform UK abortion law, say health organisations.
BMJ. 2016 Dec 28;355:i6841. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6841.
8
Abortion law reform in Victoria: lessons for the UK.
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2017 Jan;43(1):25. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101676.
9
Reforming abortion services in the UK: less hypocrisy, more acknowledgment of complexity.
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2017 Jan;43(1):3-4. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101696.
10
Abortion Stigma Among Low-Income Women Obtaining Abortions in Western Pennsylvania: A Qualitative Assessment.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Mar;49(1):29-36. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12014. Epub 2016 Dec 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验