• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国获取堕胎服务的障碍以及在家中使用米非司酮和米索前列醇的观点。

Barriers to accessing abortion services and perspectives on using mifepristone and misoprostol at home in Great Britain.

作者信息

Aiken Abigail R A, Guthrie Katherine A, Schellekens Marlies, Trussell James, Gomperts Rebecca

机构信息

LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA; Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.

Women on Web, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Contraception. 2018 Feb;97(2):177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.003
PMID:28941978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5801070/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine reasons for seeking abortion services outside the formal healthcare system in Great Britain, where abortion is legally available.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a mixed-methods study among women resident in England, Scotland, and Wales who requested at-home medication abortion through online telemedicine initiative Women on Web (WoW) between November 22, 2016, and March 22, 2017. We examined the demographics and circumstances of all women requesting early medication abortion and conducted a content analysis of a sample of their anonymized emails to the service to explore their reasons for seeking help.

RESULTS

Over a 4-month period, 519 women contacted WoW seeking medication abortion. These women were diverse with respect to age, parity, and circumstance. One hundred eighty women reported 209 reasons for seeking abortion outside the formal healthcare setting. Among all reasons, 49% were access barriers, including long waiting times, distance to clinic, work or childcare commitments, lack of eligibility for free NHS services, and prior negative experiences of abortion care; 30% were privacy concerns, including lack of confidentiality of services, perceived or experienced stigma, and preferring the privacy and comfort of using pills at home; and 18% were controlling circumstances, including partner violence and partner/family control.

CONCLUSION

Despite the presence of abortion services in Great Britain, a diverse group of women still experiences logistical and personal barriers to accessing care through the formal healthcare system, or prefer the privacy of conducting their abortions in their own homes. Health services commissioning bodies could address existing barriers if supported by policy frameworks.

IMPLICATIONS

The presence of multiple barriers to accessing abortion care in Great Britain highlights the need for future guidelines to recommend a more woman-centered approach to service provision. Reducing the number of clinic visits and designing services to meet the needs of those living in controlling circumstances are particularly important goals.

摘要

目的

在英国(堕胎在该国合法),研究在正规医疗系统之外寻求堕胎服务的原因。

研究设计

我们对居住在英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士的女性进行了一项混合方法研究,这些女性在2016年11月22日至2017年3月22日期间通过在线远程医疗项目“网络上的女性”(WoW)申请在家进行药物流产。我们研究了所有申请早期药物流产女性的人口统计学特征和情况,并对她们发送给该服务机构的匿名电子邮件样本进行了内容分析,以探究她们寻求帮助的原因。

结果

在4个月的时间里,519名女性联系了WoW寻求药物流产。这些女性在年龄、生育状况和情况方面各不相同。180名女性报告了在正规医疗环境之外寻求堕胎的209个原因。在所有原因中,49%是获取障碍,包括等待时间长、距离诊所远、工作或育儿事务、不符合免费国民保健服务资格以及之前堕胎护理的负面经历;30%是隐私担忧,包括服务缺乏保密性、感知或经历的耻辱感以及更喜欢在家服用药物的隐私和舒适度;18%是控制性情况,包括伴侣暴力和伴侣/家庭控制。

结论

尽管英国有堕胎服务,但仍有不同群体的女性在通过正规医疗系统获得护理方面面临后勤和个人障碍,或者更喜欢在自己家中进行堕胎的隐私性。如果有政策框架支持,卫生服务委托机构可以解决现有障碍。

启示

英国在获取堕胎护理方面存在多种障碍,这凸显了未来指南需要推荐一种更以女性为中心的服务提供方式。减少诊所就诊次数以及设计服务以满足处于控制性情况的人群的需求是特别重要的目标。

相似文献

1
Barriers to accessing abortion services and perspectives on using mifepristone and misoprostol at home in Great Britain.英国获取堕胎服务的障碍以及在家中使用米非司酮和米索前列醇的观点。
Contraception. 2018 Feb;97(2):177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
2
Factors Associated With Use of an Online Telemedicine Service to Access Self-managed Medical Abortion in the US.与使用美国在线远程医疗服务获取自我管理药物流产相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111852. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11852.
3
Women's experiences of a telemedicine abortion service (up to 12 weeks) implemented during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: a qualitative evaluation.在冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行期间实施的(最多 12 周)远程医疗堕胎服务中妇女的体验:定性评估。
BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1752-1761. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16813. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
4
Motivations for using misoprostol for abortion outside the formal healthcare system in Colombia: a qualitative study of women seeking postabortion care in Bogotá and the Coffee Axis.哥伦比亚非正规医疗体系下使用米索前列醇进行堕胎的动机:波哥大和咖啡带寻求流产后护理的女性的定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2024 Jun 1;21(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01814-0.
5
Medical abortion with mifepristone and home administration of misoprostol up to 63 days' gestation.药物流产合并米非司酮及米索前列醇用于终止 63 日龄内妊娠。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jul;93(7):647-53. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12398. Epub 2014 May 23.
6
Home self-administration of vaginal misoprostol for medical abortion at 50-63 days compared with gestation of below 50 days.妊娠 50-63 天行门诊在家自行应用米索前列醇药物流产与妊娠<50 天行药物流产的比较。
Hum Reprod. 2010 May;25(5):1153-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq037. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
7
Implementing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in Norway 1998-2013.1998 - 2013年在挪威使用米非司酮和米索前列醇实施药物流产
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):643-651. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw270.
8
In-depth interviews with medical abortion clients: thoughts on the method and home administration of misoprostol.对药物流产客户的深入访谈:关于米索前列醇的使用方法及在家服用的看法。
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2000;55(3 Suppl):169-72.
9
Mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion: home administration of misoprostol in Guadeloupe.米非司酮 - 米索前列醇药物流产:在瓜德罗普岛在家自行服用米索前列醇。
Contraception. 1999 Sep;60(3):167-72. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00074-8.
10
Low-dose mifepristone 200 mg and vaginal misoprostol for abortion.低剂量米非司酮200毫克联合阴道用米索前列醇用于流产。
Contraception. 1999 Jan;59(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00150-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Telehealth abortion services via Women on Web in Kenya (2013-2019): a descriptive analysis of the characteristics and motivations of the care seekers.肯尼亚通过“网络上的妇女”组织提供的远程医疗堕胎服务(2013 - 2019年):对寻求护理者的特征和动机的描述性分析
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2500828. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2500828. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
2
Assessing feasibility and acceptability of increasing access to sexual and reproductive health and rights through pharmacy outlets and community health volunteers: lessons from pilot study in Kenya.评估通过药店和社区卫生志愿者增加性与生殖健康及权利可及性的可行性和可接受性:肯尼亚试点研究的经验教训
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1663. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12176-5.
3
Childcare as a social determinant of access to healthcare: a scoping review.儿童保育作为获得医疗保健的社会决定因素:一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 3;12:1443992. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1443992. eCollection 2024.
4
Themes in Abortion Forum Discussions in a Restrictive Access Context: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses.限制获取情况下堕胎论坛讨论的主题:定性与定量分析
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 9;26:e59544. doi: 10.2196/59544.
5
Patient and health professional attitudes towards the use of telemedicine for abortion care in Britain: Findings from the SACHA study.英国患者和医疗专业人员对使用远程医疗进行堕胎护理的态度:SACHA研究的结果。
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 3;10:20552076241288717. doi: 10.1177/20552076241288717. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Delays in seeking abortion and its determinants among reproductive-age women based on the Ethiopian Demographic and health survey.基于埃塞俄比亚人口与健康调查的育龄妇女寻求堕胎的延迟情况及其决定因素
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 26;10(19):e38477. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38477. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
7
The experiences and perspectives of abortion seekers who travel for care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.寻求堕胎者的经验和观点:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 11;10(10):CD015565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015565.
8
The Role of Electronic Health Tools in Unwanted Pregnancy Prevention, Abortion and Post-Abortion Follow-Up: A Systematic Review.电子健康工具在意外怀孕预防、堕胎及堕胎后随访中的作用:一项系统综述
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2023 Sep 8;28(5):487-503. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_312_20. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
9
Experiences seeking, sourcing, and using abortion pills at home in the United States through an online telemedicine service.在美国,通过在线远程医疗服务在家中获取、采购和使用堕胎药的经历。
SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100075. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
10
Reach, experience, and acceptability of an abortion self-care intervention in Bolivia: a mixed-methods evaluation.玻利维亚堕胎自我护理干预的可及性、体验和可接受性:一项混合方法评估。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2139888. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2139888.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of very early medical termination of pregnancy: a cohort study.极早期药物终止妊娠的疗效和安全性:一项队列研究。
BJOG. 2017 Dec;124(13):1993-1999. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14904. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
2
Self reported outcomes and adverse events after medical abortion through online telemedicine: population based study in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.通过在线远程医疗进行药物流产后的自我报告结局及不良事件:爱尔兰共和国和北爱尔兰的基于人群的研究
BMJ. 2017 May 16;357:j2011. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2011.
3
Self-management of first trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study of women's experiences.《早孕人工流产后自我管理:对女性体验的定性研究》
BJOG. 2017 Dec;124(13):2001-2008. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14690. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
4
Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States.堕胎护理的障碍及其对前往接受服务的患者的影响:来自两个州的定性研究结果
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Jun;49(2):95-102. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12024. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
5
Brief background to Irish abortion law.爱尔兰堕胎法简介。
BJOG. 2017 Jul;124(8):1216. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14486. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
6
"If I ever did have a daughter, I wouldn't raise her in New Brunswick:" exploring women's experiences obtaining abortion care before and after policy reform.“如果我真有个女儿,我不会在新不伦瑞克抚养她:”探索政策改革前后女性获得堕胎护理的经历。
Contraception. 2017 May;95(5):477-484. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
7
Reform UK abortion law, say health organisations.健康组织称,应改革英国堕胎法。
BMJ. 2016 Dec 28;355:i6841. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6841.
8
Abortion law reform in Victoria: lessons for the UK.维多利亚州的堕胎法改革:给英国的教训。
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2017 Jan;43(1):25. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101676.
9
Reforming abortion services in the UK: less hypocrisy, more acknowledgment of complexity.英国堕胎服务改革:减少伪善,更多地承认复杂性。
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2017 Jan;43(1):3-4. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101696.
10
Abortion Stigma Among Low-Income Women Obtaining Abortions in Western Pennsylvania: A Qualitative Assessment.宾夕法尼亚州西部低收入堕胎女性中的堕胎污名化:一项定性评估
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Mar;49(1):29-36. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12014. Epub 2016 Dec 16.